Spatially localized unstable periodic orbits of a high-dimensional chaotic system

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 1998, Pages R2511-R2514

  Zoldi, Scott M ^a   Greenside, Henry S ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CALCULATIONS; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; DAMPING; ERRORS; FRACTALS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS;

NEWTON METHOD; UNSTABLE PERIODIC ORBITS;

CHAOS THEORY;

EID: 0032028875     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.57.R2511     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. R. Artuso, E. Aurell, and P. Cvitanović, Nonlinearity 3, 325 (1990).
2. K. Pawelzik and H. G. Schuster, Phys. Rev. A 43, 1808 (1991).
3. D. P. Lathrop and E. J. Kostelich, Phys. Rev. A 40, 4028 (1989);
4. R. Badii, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 1389 (1994).
5. E. Ott, C. Grebogi, and J. A. Yorke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1196 (1990);
6. K. Pyragas, Phys. Lett. A 170, 421 (1992);
7. G. Chen and X. Dong, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 3, 1363 (1993).
8. C. Grebogi, E. Ott, and J. A. Yorke, Phys. Rev. A 37, 1711 (1988).
9. E. J. Kostelich, I. Kan, C. Grebogi, E. Ott, and J. Yorke, Physica D 109, 81 (1997).
10. A. Politi and A. Torcini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3421 (1992);
11. A. PolitiA. TorciniChaos 2, 293 (1992).
12. M. C. Cross and P. C. Hohenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 851 (1993).
13. In previous work, Politi et al. 7 have studied UPOs of a one-dimensional extensively chaotic system with discrete time, consisting of up to six weakly coupled Hénon maps. In contrast, our analysis concerns a continuous-time strongly-coupled system with an emphasis on the spatial structure of the UPOs. Also, Kevrekidis and collaborators [
14. A. Bangia, SIAM J. Sci. Comp. 18, 775 (1997);
15. Jolly Physica D 44, 38 (1990)] have computed periodic orbits from partial differential equations in a low-fractal-dimension or stable regime and studied bifurcations of these solutions. Our emphasis is again different; we start in a high-fractal-dimension regime where we do not have weakly unstable solutions to apply continuation.
16. J. E. Dennis and R. Schnabel, Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Nonlinear Equations (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1983).
17. P. Manneville, in Macroscopic Modeling of Turbulent Flows, Vol. 230 of Lecture Notes in Physics, edited by O. Pironneau (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985), pp. 319–326.
18. Recently, F. Christiansen, P. Cvitanović and V. Putkaradze Nonlinearity 10, 55 (1997) also studied the KS equation to investigate how a chaotic attractor may be related to the UPOs whose closure defines that attractor. Their emphasis and results differ from ours in that these authors considered a smaller periodic domain for which the chaotic dynamics is low-dimensional (we estimate D<2.1 from their data) and for which the set of UPOs has an explicit symbolic dynamics.
19. T. S. Parker and L. O. Chua, Practical Numerical Algorithms for Chaotic Systems (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989).
20. We used the convergence criterion ‖U(T)-U0‖∞ <10-3‖U0‖∞ for the residual and ‖δX‖∞<10-3‖X0‖∞ for the correction, where the infinity norm ‖X‖∞=maxi|Xi|and where the vector U(T) is the numerical trajectory evaluated at time t=T that passes through the initial value U0 at time t=0.
21. Our inability to find approximate recurrences from numerical output U(t) suggests that some of the widely used control methods 4 will not succeed in stabilizing UPOs since they depend on knowing an approximate recurrence as input to the algorithm.
22. UPOs were considered distinct if their time-averaged pattern m(x)=〈u(t, x)〉 and variance v(x)=〈(u(t, x)-m(x))2〉 averaged over one period differed by at least 0.01 and if their periods differed by at least 0.01.
23. B. J. Gluckman, C. B. Arnold, and J. P. Gollub, Phys. Rev. E 51, 1128 (1995).