Calculation of monopolar corona at a high voltage DC transmission line with crosswinds

Journal of Electrostatics

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 61-77

  Medlin, A J ^a   Morrow, R ^b   Fletcher, C A J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

Charge advection; Charge diffusion; Crosswind; Monopolar corona; Multigrid; Pseudotransient; Space charge; Transmission line

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; CURRENT DENSITY; CURRENT VOLTAGE CHARACTERISTICS; ELECTRIC CORONA; ELECTRIC LINES; HVDC POWER TRANSMISSION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TRANSIENTS;

CHARGE ADVECTION; CHARGE DIFFUSION; ELECTRICAL POTENTIAL DISTRIBUTIONS; PSEUDOTRANSIENT;

ELECTRIC SPACE CHARGE;

EID: 0032027168     PISSN: 03043886     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3886(97)00164-2     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. M. Hara, N. Hayashi, K. Shiotsuki, M. Akazaki, Influence of wind and conductor potential on the distributions of electric field and ion current density at ground level in DC high voltage line to plane geometry, IEEE Trans. Power Appl. Systems PAS-101 (1982) 803-814.
2. J. Davis, J. Hoburg, HVDC transmission line computations using finite element and characteristics methods, J. Electrostat. 18 (1986) 1-22.
3. M. Sarma, W. Janischewskyj, Analysis of corona losses on DC transmission lines: I - Unipolar lines, IEEE Trans. Power Appl. Sys. PAS-88 (1969) 718-731.
4. T. Takuma, T. Kawamoto, A very stable calculation method for ion flow field of HVDC transmission lines, IEEE Trans. Pow. Del. PWRD-2 (1987) 189-198.
5. M. Khalifa, M. Abdel-Salam, M. Abou-Seada, Analysis of the effects of wind on DC transmission line corona losses, IEEE Pow. Eng. Soc. Winter Meeting, 1973, paper No. C73 163-3.
6. M. Abdel-Salam, Z. Al-Hamouz, Finite-element analysis of monopolar ionized fields including ion diffusion, J. Phys. D 26 (1993) 2202-2211.
7. M. Abdel-Salam, M. Farghally, S. Abdel-Sattar, Finite element solution of monopolar corona equation, IEEE Trans. Electrical Insulation EI-18 (1983) 110-119.
8. M. Aboelsaad, L. Shafai, M. Rashwan, Numerical assessment of unipolar corona ionised field quantities using the finite-element method, IEE Proc. 136A (1989) 79-86.
9. M. Horenstein, Computation of corona space charge, electric field, and V-I characteristic using equipotential charge shells, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. IA-20 (1984) 1607-1612.
10. K. Adamiak, Adaptive approach to finite element modelling of corona fields, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 30 (1994) 387-393.
11. H. Wintle, Unipolar wire-to-plane corona: a definitive computation, IEEE Trans. Electrical Insulation 27 (1992) 298-308.
12. I. Ciric, E. Kuffel, On the boundary conditions for unipolar DC corona field calculation, in: Proc. 4th Int. Symp. on HV Eng., vol. 1, 1983, pp. 13.07-1-13.07-4.
13. A. Medlin, C.A.J. Fletcher, R. Morrow, A pseudotransient approach to steady state solution of electric field-space charge coupled problems, J. Electrostatics 43 (1998) 39-60, this issue.
14. M. Abdel-Salam, D. Wiitanen, Calculation of corona onset voltage for duct-type precipitators, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 29 (1993) 274-280.
15. F. Peek, Dielectric Phenomena in High Voltage Engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1929.
16. J. Lowke, R. Morrow, Theory of electrical corona including the role of plasma chemistry, Pure Appl. Chem. 66 (1994) 1287-1294.
17. M. Aboelsaad, L. Shafai, M. Rashwan, Improved analytical method for computing unipolar DC corona losses, IEE Proc. 136A (1989) 33-40.
18. C. Fletcher, Computational Techniques for Fluid Dynamics, vol. I, Springer, Berlin, 1991.
19. B. Hutchinson, G. Raithby, A multigrid method based on the additive correction strategy, Num. Heat. Trans. 9 (1986) 511-537.
20. C. Fletcher, Computational Techniques for Fluid Dynamics, vol. II, Springer, Berlin, 1991.
21. S. Abdel-Sattar, H. Singer, Electrical conditions in wire-duct electrostatic precipitators, J. Electrostatics 26 (1991) 1-20.