Optical simulation of quantum logic

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 1998, Pages R1477-R1480

  Cerf, N J ^a   Adami, C ^a   Kwiat, P G ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; INTERFEROMETERS; LIGHT POLARIZATION; LOGIC GATES; NONLINEAR OPTICS; OPTICAL BEAM SPLITTERS; OPTICAL DEVICES; OPTICAL KERR EFFECT; OPTICAL ROTATION; PHASE SHIFTERS; PHOTONS;

OPTICAL SIMULATION; QUANTUM ALGORITHM; QUANTUM CIRCUIT; QUANTUM COMPUTATION; QUANTUM LOGIC;

QUANTUM OPTICS;

EID: 0032026235     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.57.R1477     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. D. P. DiVincenzo, Science 270, 255 (1995).
2. A. Barenco et al, Phys. Rev. A 52, 3457 (1995).
3. D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A 51, 1015 (1995);
4. D. Deutsch, A. Barenco, and A. Ekert, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 449, 669 (1995);
5. S. Lloyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 346 (1995).
6. M. Reck, A. Zeilinger, H. J. Bernstein, and P. Bertani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 58 (1994).
7. B. Yurke, S. L. McCall, and J. R. Klauder, Phys. Rev. A 33, 4033 (1986);
8. S. Prasad, M. O. Scully, and W. Martienssen, Opt. Commun. 62, 139 (1987).
9. I. L. Chuang and Y. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. A 52, 3489 (1995);
10. I. L. ChuangY. YamamotoPhys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4281 (1996).
11. G. J. Milburn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2124 (1989).
12. V. Degiorgio, Am. J. Phys. 48, 81 (1980);
13. Am. J. Phys.A. Zeilinger, 49, 882 (1981);
14. Am. J. Phys.Z. Y. Ou and L. Mandel, 57, 66 (1989).
15. Here and below, it is understood that the path lengths are adjusted so that the difference between dynamical phases vanishes.
16. This teleportation circuit is equivalent to the one described in G. Brassard, S. L. Braunstein, and R. Cleve (unpublished).
17. C. H. Bennett et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).
18. For convenience, two realizations (B and (Formula presented)) of the Hadamard gate are used in Fig. 33, where (Formula presented) is obtained from B by interchanging the (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) output ports in Fig. 11(a).
19. A polarizing beam splitter leaves a horizontally polarized photon (in polarization state |0〉) unchanged, while vertical polarization (state |1〉) is reflected.
20. Phase shifts that occur after polarization transformations C (and which must therefore be independent of polarization) could be produced by a calibrated rotation of a thin glass plate.
21. L. Vaidman, L. Goldenberg, and S. Wiesner, Phys. Rev. A 54, R1745 (1996);
22. S. L. Braunstein, e-print quant-ph/960304;
23. R. Laflamme et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 198 (1996).