Evaluation of a three-state adaptive sample size X control chart

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 733-743

  Zimmer, L S ^a   Montgomery, D C ^a   Runger, G C ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; MONITORING; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; QUALITY ASSURANCE;

CONTROL CHARTS;

PROCESS CONTROL;

EID: 0032025709     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/002075498193660     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Annadi, H. P., Keats, J. B., Runger, G. C., and Montgomery, D. C., 1995, An adaptive sample size CUSUM control chart. International Journal of Production Research, 33, 1605-1616.
2. Brook, D., and Evans, D. A., 1972, An approach to the probability distribution of CUSUM run lengths. Biometrika, 59, 539-549.
3. Costa, A. F. B., 1994, X charts with variable sample size. Journal of Quality Technology, 26, 155-163.
4. Daudin, J. J., 1992, Double sampling X charts. Journal of Quality Technology, 24, 78-87.
5. Flaig, J. J., 1991, Adaptive control charts, Statistical Process Control in Manufacturing, edited by J. B. Keats and D. C. Montgomery (New York: Marcel Dekker, ASQC Quality Press), pp. 111-122.
6. Lucas, J. M., and Crosier, R. B., 1982, Fast initial response for CUSUM quality control schemes. Technometrics, 24, 199-205.
7. Prabhu, S. S., Montgomery, D. C., and Runger, G. C., 1995, A combined adaptive sample size and sampling interval X control scheme. Journal of Quality Technology, 26, 164-176.
8. Prabhu, S. S., Montgomery, D. C., and Runger, G. C., 1995, A design tool to evaluate average time to signal properties of adaptive control X charts. Journal of Quality Technology, 27, 74-83.
9. Prabhu, S. S., Runger, G. C., and Keats, J. B., 1993, X chart with adaptive sample sizes. International Journal of Production Research, 31, 2895-2909.
10. Reynolds, M. R. Jr., Amin, R. W., Arnold, J. C., and Nachlas, J. A., 1988, Charts with variable sampling intervals. Technometrics, 30, 181-192.
11. Runger, G. C., and Montgomery, D. C., 1993, Adaptive sampling enhancements for Shewhart control charts. IIE Transactions, 25, 4151.
12. Runger, G. C., and Pignatiello, J. J., 1991, Adaptive sampling for process control. Journal of Quality Technology, 23, 135-155.