Maximize propylene production: New process enables olefins producers to recover more C 3= without sacrificing C 2=

Hydrocarbon Processing

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 61-66

  Cosyns, J ^a,b,c,d   Chodorge, J ^a,b,e   Commereuc, D ^a,d,f,g,h,i   Torck, B ^a,g,h,j  

^a IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES   (France)

^b IFP's Industrial Division   (France)

^c Kinetics and Catalysis Division   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

^f IFP's Kinetics and Catalys Division

^g University of Paris   (France)

^h IFP School   (France)

ⁱ IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^j Ecole des Hautes Etudes Industrielle   (France)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AROMATIC COMPOUNDS; CATALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; DEHYDROGENATION; ECONOMICS; FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING; FRACTIONATION; MANUFACTURE; MARKETING; OLEFINS; PRODUCTION;

EQUILIBRIUM CONVERSION; LIGHT OLEFIN DEMAND; METATHESIS; NAPHTHA CRACKER; REACTION REGENERATION TEMPERATURE DIFFERENTIAL;

POLYPROPYLENES;

EID: 0032022193     PISSN: 00188190     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Oil & Gas Journal, Jan. 13, 1997, pp. 31-32.
2. European Chemical News, Oct. 21-27, 1996, pp. 27-28.
3. Cosyns, J., A. Hennico, F. Montecot and Duée, Hydrocarbon Technology International, Spring 1994, pp. 70-76.
4. The IFP-CPC (Chinese Petroleum Corporation, Taiwan) Meta-4 Process. Demonstration plant operated between April 1988 and September 1990 in Kaoshiung, Taiwan.