The deadly dull issue of university “administration”? Good governance, managerialism and organising academic work

Higher Education Policy

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 59-79

  Dearlove, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032020276     PISSN: 09528733     EISSN: 17403863     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0952-8733(97)00033-0     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Ashby, E. (1963). Decision-Making in the Academic World. Sociological Review Monograph No. 7, 5-13.
2. AUT (1990). The Internal Government of Universities. London: AUT.
3. AUT (1995). Ethics in Education. Evidence to the Nolan Committee from the Association of University Teachers. London: AUT.
4. AUT (1995). Higher Education: Preparing for the 21st Century. London: AUT.
5. Bagehot, W. (1867). The English Constitution, edited and with an introduction by R. H. S. Crossman. London: Fontana.
6. Baldridge, J. V. 1971. Academic Governance. Berkeley: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
7. Bargh, C., Scott, P. and Smith, D. (1995). Changing Patterns of Governance in Higher Education. University of Leeds: Centre for Policy Studies in Education.
8. Becher, T. and Kogan, M, (1992). Process and Structure in Higher Education. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.
9. Becker, H. S. (1970). The nature of profession. In H. S. Becker (Ed.), Sociological Work. Chicago: Aldine.
10. Benveniste, G. (1987). Professionalizing the Organisation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Berdahl, R. (1990). Academic freedom, autonomy and accountability in British universities. Studies in Higher Education, 15. 169-180.
12. Bcrgquist, W. H. (1992). The Four Cultures of the Academy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Birnbaum, R. (1988). How Colleges Work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Blau, P. (1973). The Organisation of Academic Work. London: Wiley.
15. Bledstein, B. J. (1976). The Culture of Professionalism. New York: Norton Books.
16. Cadbury Committee (1992). Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, under the Chairmanship of Adrian Cadbury. London: The Committee.
17. Carr-Saundent, A. M. and Wilson, P. A. (1933). The Professions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Carswell, J. (1985). Government and the Universities in Britain. London: Cambridge University Press.
19. Chaston, I. (1994). Strategies of management in the new UK universities. Higher Education Review, 26, 65-75.
20. Clark, B. R. (1983). The Higher Education System. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21. Clark, B. R. (1987). The Academic Profession. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22. Clark, B. R. (1995). Leadership and innovation in universities: from theory to practice. Tertiary Education and Management, 1, 7-11.
23. Cleveland, H. (1960). The Dean's dilemma: leadership of equals. Public Administration Review, 20. 22-27.
24. CoCoUCaB (1994). Advice on University Governance. London: CoCoUCaB.
25. Cohen, M. D. and March, J. G. (1974). Leadership and Ambiguity: The American College President. New York: McGraw-Hill.
26. Cooper, B., and Muth, R. (1993). Internal and external barriers to change in departments of educational administration. In T. A. Mulkeen et at. (Eds.), Democratic Leadership. Norwood. NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
27. Council for Academic Democracy (1995). Academic Democracy. London: CAA.
28. Croharn Committee (1987). Review of the University Grants Committee, Report of a Committee under the Chairmanship of Lord Croharn. Cm 81. London: HMSO.
29. CUC (1995). Guide for Members of Governing Bodies of Universities and Colleges in England and Wales, M 1195. Bristol: HFCE.
30. CVCP (1995). Standards in Public Life: Local Public Spending Bodies, N/95/203. London: CVCP.
31. CVCP (1996). CVCP Welcomes Second Nolan Report, PR 432, 16 May 1996. London: CVCP.
32. Dearlove, J. (1995). Governance, Leadership and Change in Universities. Paris: UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning.
33. DES (1967). Polytechnics, especially Appendix A, Government and Academic Organisation of Polytechnics: Notes for Guidance, Administrative Memorandum No. 8 67. London: HMSO.
34. Duke, C. (1993). The Learning Unirersity. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.
35. Duncan, C. (1992). The Evolution of Public Management. London: Macmillan.
36. Elton, L. (1981). Can universities change? Studies in Higher Education. 6, 23-33.
37. Eustace, R. (1987). The English ideal of university governance: a missing rationale and some implications. Studies in Higher Education, 12. 7-22.
38. Eustace, R. (1994). University autonomy: the "80s and after ". Higher Education Quarterly, 4H. 86-117.
39. FEFC (1994). Guide for College Governors. Coventry: FEFC.
40. FLIC (1995). Conduct of the Council's Business, Circular 9504. Coventry: FEFC.
41. Fender, B. (1993). Promoting People. London: CVCP.
42. Ferns, H. S. (1982). How Much Freedom for Universities'.-' London: Institute for Economic Affairs.
43. Friedson, E. (1994). Professionalism Reborn. London: Polity. The Governance of Public Bodies: A Progress Report, 1997, Cm 3557. London: HMSO.
44. Halsey, A. H. (1979). Are the British universities capable of change? New Universities Quarterly. 33, 402-416.
45. Halsey, A. H. (1992). Decline of Donnish Dominion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
46. Halsey, A.H., and Trow, M. (1971). The British Academics. London: Faber and Faber.
47. Higher Education: Meeting the Challenge (1987). Cm 114. London: HMSO.
48. HEFCE (1995). Code of Best Practice for Members of the Higher Education Funding Council for England, M 10/95. Bristol: HEFCE.
49. HEFCE (1995a). Standards in Public Life: Higher Education institutions, Memorandum by the Higher Education Funding Council for England to the Committee on Standards in Public Life. Bristol: HEFCE.
50. Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69, 3-20.
51. Jackson, J. A. (1970). Professions and Professionalization. London: Cambridge University Press.
52. Jarratt Committee (1985). Report, Steering Committee for Efficiency Studies in Universities under the Chairmanship of Alex Jarratt. London: CVC P.
53. Johnson, T. (1972). Professions and Power. London: Macmillan.
54. Kennerly, J. A. (1992). Managing professionals and professional autonomy. Higher Education Quarterly, 46, 166-173
55. Kogan, M. (1989). Managerialism in higher education. In D. Lawdon (Ed.), The Educational Reform Act, pp. 68-81. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
56. Kogan, M. and Kogan, D. (1983). The Attack on Higher Education. London: Kogan-Page.
57. Mackie, D. (1995). Autonomy versus accountability: maintaining the delicate balance. Tertiary Education and Management, 1. 62-71.
58. Miller, H. (1991). Academics and their labour process. In C. Smith, D. Knights, and H. Wilmott (Eds.), White Collar Work, pp. 109-137. London: Macmillan.
59. Miller, H. (1995). The Management of Change in Universities. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.
60. Millett, J. (1962). The Academic Community. New York: McGraw-Hill.
61. Mills, C. W. (1959). The Sociological Imagination. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
62. Moodie, G. C. (1976). Authority, charters and the survival of academic rule. Studies in Higher Education. 1, 127-135.
63. Moodie, G. C. and Eustace, R. (1974). Power and Authority in British Universities. London: Allen and Unwin.
64. NAB (1987). Management for a Purpose, The Report of the Good Management Practice Group. London: NAB.
65. NAO (1995). Severance Payments to Senior Staff in the Publicly Funded Education Sector, HC 202, Session 1994 95. London: HMSO.
66. NATFHE (1995). Evidence to the Nolan Committee, and Opening up the Institutions. London: NATFHE.
67. NATFHE (1995). Governance, Democracy and Accountability in Higher Education. London: NATFHE.
68. Neave, G. and Van Vught, F. (1991). Prometheus Bound: The Changing Relationship Between Government and Higher Education in Western Europe. Oxford: Pergamon.
69. Nolan Committee (1995). Standards in Public Life, First Report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life under the Chairmanship of Lord Nolan, Cm 2850-1. London: HMSO.
70. Nolan Committee (1996). Local Public Spending Bodies, Second Report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life under the Chairmanship of Lord Nolan, Cm 3270-1. London: HMSO.
71. Peeke, G. (1994). Mission and Change: Institutional Mission and its Application to the Management of Further and Higher Education. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.
72. Pollitt, C. (1993). Managerialism and the Public Services, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
73. Raelin, J. A. (1986). The Clash of Cultures: Managers and Professionals. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
74. Ravetz, J. R. (1971). Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems. Oxford: Clarendon.
75. Robbins Committee (1963). Higher Education, Report of the Committee on Higher Education under the Chairmanship of Lord Robbins, Cmnd 2154. London: HMSO.
76. Robertson, D. (1994). Choosing to Change. London: HEQC.
77. Robinson, E. E. (1968). The New Polytechnics. London: Cornmarket.
78. Russell, C. (1993). Academic Freedom. London: Routledge.
79. Scott, P. (1991). Beyond the dual support system: scholarship, research and teaching in the context of academic autonomy. Studies in Higher Education, 16, 5-13.
80. Shattock, M. (1994). The UGC and the Management of the British Universities. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.
81. Sizer, J. (1987). An Analysis of Institutions' Responses to Constitutional Recommendations in the Jarratt Report. London: UGC.
82. Smyth, J. (1989). Collegiality as a counter discourse to the intrusion of corporate management into higher education. Journal of Tertiary Educational Administration, II, 143-155.
83. Smyth, J. (1995). Academic Work: The Changing Labour Process in Higher Education. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.
84. Stewart, A., and Stewart, V. (1974). The Management of Professionals. Brighton: Institute of Manpower Services.
85. Stewart, R. (1991). Managing Today and Tomorrow. London: Macmillan.
86. Tancred-Sherifif, P. (1985). Craft, hierarchy and bureaucracy: modes of control of the academic labour process. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 10, 369-390.
87. Tapper, T. and Salter, B. (1992). Oxford, Cambridge and the Changing Idea of the University: The Challenge to Donnish Domination. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.
88. Tapper, T. and Salter, B. (1995). The changing idea of university autonomy. Studies in Higher Education. 20, 59-71.
89. Trow, M. (1984). Managerialism and the Academic Profession: Quality and Control. London: Quality Support Centre.
90. UGC (1984). A Strategy for Higher Education into the 1990s. London: UGC.
91. UGC (1987). Report to the Secretary of State on Universities' Responses to the Jarratt Report. London: UGC.
92. Veblen, T. (1918). The Higher Learning. New York: Hill and Wang (1957).
93. Weil, S. (1994). Introducing Change from the Top in Universities and Colleges. London: Kogan-Page.
94. Willcocks, L., and Harrow, J. (1992). Rediscovering Public Services Management. London: McGraw- Hill.
95. Wooldridge, B. and Floyd, S. W. (1990). The strategy process: middle management involvement and organisational performance. Strategic Management Journal, If 231-241
96. Zifcak, S. (1994). New Managerialism: Administrative Reform in Whitehall and Canberra. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.