Mental imagery yields stimulus - Response compatibility

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 98, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 67-79

  Tlauka, Michael ^a,b   McKenna, Frank P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Functional equivalence; Mental imagery; Stimulus response compatibility

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CUES; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0032016810     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0001-6918(97)00050-4     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Anzola, G.P., Bertoloni, G., Buchtel, H.A., Rizzolatti, G., 1977. Spatial compatibility and anatomical factors in simple and choice reaction time. Neuropsychologia 15, 295-302.
2. Baddeley, A.D., Hitch, G.J., 1974. Working memory. In: G.H. Bower (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation, vol. 8. Academic Press, New York, pp. 47-90.
3. Brebner, J., Shephard, M., Cairney, P., 1972. Spatial relationships and S-R compatibility. Acta Psychologica 36, 1-15.
4. Bryant, D.J., Tversky, B., Franklin, N., 1992. Internal and external spatial frameworks for representing described scenes. J. Memory and Language 31, 74-98.
5. Cohen, M.S., Kosslyn, S.M., Breiter, H.C., Digirolamo, G.J., Thompson, W.L., Anderson, A.K., Bookheimer, S.Y., Rosen, B.R., Belliveau, J.W., 1996. Changes in cortical activity during mental rotation - a mapping study using functional MRI. Brain 119, 89-100.
6. Cooper, L.A., 1995. Varieties of visual representation: How are we to analyze the concept of mental image? Neuropsychologia 33, 1575-1582.
7. Cooper, L.A., Shepard, R.N., 1973. The time required to prepare for a rotated stimulus. Memory and Cognition 1, 246-250.
8. De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., Lauber, E., 1994. Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. J. Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20, 731-750.
9. Denis, M., Cocude, M., 1989. Scanning visual images generated from verbal descriptions. European J. Cognitive Psychology 1, 293-307.
10. Denis, M., Cocude, M., 1992. Structural properties of visual images constructed from poorly or well-structured verbal descriptions. Memory and Cognition 20, 497-506.
11. Denis, M., Zimmer, H.D., 1992. Analog properties of cognitive maps constructed from verbal descriptions. Psychological Res. 54, 286-298.
12. Driskell, J.E., Copper, C., Moran, A., 1994. Does mental practice enhance performance? J. Appl. Psychology 79, 481-492.
13. Farah, M.J., 1985. Psychophysical evidence for a shared representational medium for mental images and percepts. J. Experimental Psychology: General 114, 91-103.
14. Farah, M.J., Peronnet, F., Gonon, M.A., Giard, M.H., 1988. Electrophysiological evidence for a shared representational medium for visual images and visual percepts. J. Experimental Psychology: General 117, 248-257.
15. Feltz, D.L., Landers, D.M., 1983. The effects of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: A meta-analysis. J. Sport Psychology 5, 25-57.
16. Finke, R.A., 1980. Levels of equivalence in imagery and perception. Psychological Rev. 87, 113-132.
17. Glenberg, A.M., Meyer, M., Lindem, K., 1987. Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. J. Memory and Language 26, 69-83.
18. Hasbroucq, T., Guiard, Y., Kornblum, S., 1989. The additivity of stimulus-response compatibility with the effects of sensory and motor factors in a tactile choice reaction time task. Acta Psychologica 72, 139-144.
19. Kiess, H.O., Bloomquist, D.W., 1985. Psychological research methods. A conceptual approach. Allyn & Bacon, Boston.
20. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., Osman, A., 1990. Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - a model and taxonomy. Psychological Rev. 97, 253-270.
21. Kornblum, S., Lee, J.-W., 1995. Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. J. Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21, 855-875.
22. Kosslyn, S.M., Ball, T.M., Rieser, B.J., 1978. Visual images preserve metric spatial information: evidence from studies of image scanning. J. Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 4, 47-60.
23. Logie, R.H., Baddeley, A.D., 1990. Imagery and working memory. In: Hampson, P.J., Marks, D.F., Richardson, J.T.E. (Eds.), Imagery: Current developments. Routledge, London, pp. 103-128.
24. Lu, C.-H., Proctor, R.W., 1995. The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Rev. 2, 174-207.
25. Magliero, A., Bashore, T.R., Coles, M.G.H., Donchin, E., 1984. On the dependence of P300 latency on stimulus evaluation processes. Psychophysiology 21, 171-186.
26. Marks, D.F., 1990. On the relationship between imagery, body, and mind. In: Hampson, P.J., Marks, D.F., Richardson, J.T.E. (Eds.), Imagery: Current developments, Routledge, London, pp. 1-38.
27. Marschark, M., Cornoldi, C., 1991. Imagery and verbal memory. In: Cornoldi, C., McDaniel, M.A. (Eds.), Imagery and cognition. Springer, New York, pp. 133-182.
28. McCarthy, G., Donchin, E., 1981. A metric for thought: A comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. Science 211, 77-80.
29. Nicoletti, R., Anzola, G.P., Luppino, G., Rizzolatti, G., Umiltà, C., 1982. Spatial compatibility effects on the same side of the body midline. J. Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 8, 664-673.
30. Nicoletti, R., Umiltà, C., Ládavas, E., 1984. Compatibility due to the coding of the relative position of the effectors. Acta Psychologica 57, 133-143.
31. Proctor, R.W., Dutta, A., 1993. Do the same stimulus-response relations influence choice reactions initially and after practice . J. Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition 19, 922-930.
32. Proctor, R.W., van Zandt, T., Lu, C.-H., Weeks, D.J., 1993. Stimulus-response compatibility for moving stimuli: Perception of affordances or directional coding? J. Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19, 81-91.
33. Richardson, J.T.E., 1995. The efficacy of imagery mnemonics in memory remediation. Neuropsychologia 33, 1345-1357.
34. Riddoch, M.J., 1990. Loss of visual imagery: A generation deficit. Cognitive Neuropsychology 7, 249-273.
35. Shepard, R.N., Cooper, L.A., 1982. Mental images and their transformations. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
36. Simon, J.R., 1990. The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In: Proctor, R.W., Reeve, T.G. (Eds.), Stimulus-Response Compatibility, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 31-86.
37. Teichner, W.H., Krebs, M.J., 1974. Laws of visual choice reaction time. Psychological Rev. 81, 75-98.
38. Theios, J., 1975. The components of response latency in simple human information processing tasks. In: Rabbitt, P.M.A., Dornic, S. (Eds.), Attention and Performance V Academic Press, London, pp. 418-440.
39. Tversky, B., Franklin, N., Taylor, H.A., Bryant, D.J., 1994. Spatial mental models from descriptions . J. American Society for Information Science 45, 656-668.
40. Umiltà, C., Nicoletti, R., 1990. Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In: Proctor, R.W., Reeve, T.G. (Eds.), Stimulus-Response Compatibility, Amsterdam, North-Holland, pp. 89-116.
41. Wallace, R.J., 1971. S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. J. Experimental Psychology 88, 354-360.
42. Wallace, R.J., 1972. Spatial S-R compatibility effects involving kinesthetic cues. J. Experimental Psychology 93, 163-168.
43. Weeks, D.J., Proctor, R.W., 1990. Salient-features coding in the translation between orthogonal stimulus and response dimensions. J. Experimental Psychology: General 119, 355-366.