Mom, dad, clone: Implications for reproductive privacy

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 176-186

  Andrews, Lori B ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANIMAL; BEHAVIOR; BEHAVIOR GENETICS; CHILD; CLONING; FEMALE; GENETIC PRIVACY; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEREDITY; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; LEGAL APPROACH; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; MEDICAL ETHICS; PRIVACY; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; UNITED STATES;

GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; LEGAL APPROACH;

ADULT; ANIMALS; CHILD; CLONING, ORGANISM; ETHICS, MEDICAL; FEMALE; GENETIC DETERMINISM; GENETIC PRIVACY; GENETICS, BEHAVIORAL; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; MALE; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); PRIVACY; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032015159     PISSN: 09631801     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0963180198702117     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Specter M, Kolata G. A new creation: the path to cloning - a special report. New York Times 1997; Mar 3:A1.
2. In 1993, embryologists at George Washington University split human embryos, making twins and triplets. See Sawyer K. Researchers clone human embryo cells; work is small step in aiding infertile. Washington Post 1993;Oct 25:A4. These embryos were not implanted into a woman for gestation. This procedure is distinguishable from cloning by nuclear transfer.
3. Begley S. Little lamb, who made thee? Newsweek 1997;Mar 10:53-7. See also Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhir J, Kind AJ, Campbell KHS. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 1997;385:810-3.
4. Begley S. Little lamb, who made thee? Newsweek 1997;Mar 10:53-7. See also Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhir J, Kind AJ, Campbell KHS. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 1997;385:810-3.
5. Transcript of Clinton remarks on cloning. U.S. Newswire 1997;Mar 4.
6. E.g., Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 379 (1965); Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438 (1972).
7. Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833, 112 S.Ct. 2791 (1992).
8. Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833, 112 S.Ct. 2791, 2810 (1992).
9. Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438 (1972).
10. Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438, 453 (1972).
11. Lifchez v. Hartigan, 735 F.Supp. 1361 (N.D. Ill.), aff'd without opinion, sub nom.; Scholberg v. Lifchez, 914 F.2d 260 (7th Cir. 1990), cert, denied, 111 S.Ct. 787 (1991).
12. See note 10, Lifchez v. Hartigan 1991.
13. See note 10, Lifchez v. Hartigan 1991:1377 (citations omitted). The court also held that the statute was impermissibly vague because of its failure to define "experiment" or "therapeutic" (at 1376).
14. See Wray H, Sheler JL, Watson T. The world after cloning. U.S. News & World Report 1997;Mar 10:59.
15. Katz J. Experimentation with Human Beings 977 (1972).
16. Gaylin W. We have the awful knowledge to make exact copies of human beings. New York Times 1997;Mar 5:48.