Effects of Task Goal on Movement Kinematics and Line Bisection Performance in Adults Without Disabilities

American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 179-187

  Lin, Keh Chung ^a   Wu, Ching Yi ^b   Trombly, Catherine A ^c  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (Taiwan)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Motivation; Motor control

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; GOALS; HUMANS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 0032013038     PISSN: 02729490     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5014/ajot.52.3.179     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Allport, A. (1987). Selection for action: Some behavioural and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 395-419). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Allport, A. (1989). Visual attention. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 631-682). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Black, S. E., Martin, B., & Szalai, J. P. (1990). Evaluation of a bedside battery for hemispatial neglect in acute stroke. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 12, 109.
4. Burton, A. W., & Davis, W. E. (1992). Optimizing the involvement and performance of children with physical impairments in movement activities. Pediatric Exercise Science, 4, 236-248.
5. Charlton, J. L. (1992). Motor control considerations for assessment and rehabilitation of movement disorders. In J. J. Summers (Ed.), Approaches to the study of motor control and learning (pp. 441-467). New York: Elsevier.
6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Fisk, J. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1989). The effects of instructions to subjects on the programming of visually directed reaching movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 21, 5-19.
8. Georgopoulos, A. P. (1986). On reaching. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 9, 147-170.
9. Halligan, P. W., Donegan, C. A., & Marshall, J. C. (1992). When is a cue not a cue? On the intractability of visuospatial neglect. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 2, 283-293.
10. Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1989a). Perceptual cueing and perceptuo-motor compatibility in visuo-spatial neglect: A single case study. Neuropsychologia, 27, 1301-1307.
11. Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1989b). Two techniques for the assessment of line bisection in visuo-spatial neglect: A single case study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 52, 1300-1302.
12. Heilman, K. M., Bowers, D., & Watson, R. T. (1984). Pseudoneglect in a patient with partial callosal disconnection. Brain, 107, 519-532.
13. Heilman, K. M., & Valenstein, E. (1979). Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Annals of Neurology, 5, 166-170.
14. Heilman, K. M., Watson, R., & Valenstein, E. (1993). Neglect and related disorders. In K. M. Heilman & E. Valenstein (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology (3rd ed., pp. 279-336). New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Huss, A. J. (1981). From kinesiology to adaptation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 35, 574-580.
16. Jäncke, L. (1993). A differential effect of concurrent verbal activity on right arm movements rightwards and leftwards. Cortex, 29, 161-166.
17. Jeannerod, M. (1988). The neural and behavioral organization of goal-directed movements. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. King, L. J. (1978). Toward a science of adaptive responses, 1978 Eleanor Clarke Slagle lecture. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 32, 429-437.
19. Kinsbourne, M. (1970). A model for the mechanism of unilateral neglect in space. Transactions of the American Neurological Association, 95, 143-146.
20. Lin, K.-C. (1992). Visual and visuomotor cueing in normal adults and post-stroke patients with unilateral neglect. Unpublished manuscript, Boston University.
21. Lin, K.-C. (1993, June). Effects of cueing on unilateral neglect: Three single-subject studies. Research poster presented at the American Occupational Therapy Association Annual Conference, Seattle, WA.
22. Lin, K.-C., Cermak, S. A., Kinsbourne, M., & Trombly, C. A. (1996). Effects of left-sided movements on line bisection in unilateral neglect. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2, 404-411.
23. Lin, K.-C., Wu, C.-Y., & Trombly, C. A. (1994, April). Effects of occupational form on occupational performance: A meta-analysis. Scientific poster presented at the 11th International Congress of the World Federation of Occupational Therapists, London.
24. Lough, S., Wing, A. M., Fraser, C., & Jenner, J. R. (1984). Measurement of recovery of function in the hemiparetic upper limb following stroke: A preliminary report. Human Movement Science, 3, 247-256.
25. Marteniuk, R. G., MacKenzie, C. L., Jeannerod, M., Athenes, S., & Dugas, C. (1987). Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 365-378.
26. Mattingley, J. B., Pierson, J. M., Bradshaw, J. L., Phillips, J. G., & Bradshaw, J. A. (1993). To see or not to see: The effects of visible and invisible cues on line bisection judgements in unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia, 31, 1201-1215.
27. Milner, A. D., Brechmann, M., & Pagliarini, L. (1992). To half and to half not: An analysis of line bisection judgements in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 30, 515-526.
28. Nagasaki, H. (1989). Asymmetric velocity and acceleration profiles of human arm movements. Experimental Brain Research, 74, 319-326.
29. Neumann, O. (1990). Visual attention and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action (pp. 227-267). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
30. Newell, K. M. (1986). Constraints on the development of coordination. In M. G. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control (pp. 341-360). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
31. Nichelli, P., Rinaldi, M., & Cubelli, R. (1989). Selective spatial attention and length representation in normal subjects and in patients with unilateral spatial neglect. Brain and Cognition, 9(1), 57-70.
32. Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (1993). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.
33. Requin, J. (1985). Looking forward to moving soon: Ante factum selective processes in motor control. In M. Posner & O. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., & Posner, M. A. (1990). Components of neglect from right-hemisphere damage: An analysis of line bisection. Neuropsychologia, 28, 327-333.
35. Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1983). The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia, 21, 589-599.
36. Rizzolatti, G., & Gallese, V. (1988). Mechanisms and theories of spatial neglect. In F. Boiler & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 1, pp. 223-246). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
37. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
39. Samuelsson, H. (1990). Unilateral spatial neglect after right-brain damage expressed in a line-bisecting task. Goteborg Psychological Reports, 20(3), 31-38.
40. Scholz, J. P. (1989). Reliability and validity of the WATS-MART three-dimensional optoelectric motion analysis system. Physical Therapy, 69, 679-789.
41. Shepherd, R. B. (1995). Physiotherapy in paediatrics (3rd ed., pp. 49-50). Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
42. Stelmach, G., & Hughes, B. (1983). Does motor skill automation require a theory of attention? In R. Magill (Ed.), Memory and the control of action (pp. 67-92). Amsterdam: North Holland.
43. Thelen, E., & Fisher, D. M. (1983). The organization of spontaneous leg movements in newborn infants. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 353-377.
44. Thelen, E., Skala, K. D., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1987). The dynamic nature of early coordination: Evidence from bilateral leg movements in young infants. Developmental Psychology, 3, 179-186.
45. Trombly, C. A., Wu, C.-Y., & Cope, S. (1994). [Reliability of the OPTOTRAK three-dimensional motion analysis system.] Unpublished raw data.
46. van Vliet, P., Kerwin, D. G., Sheridan, M. R., & Fentem, P. (1995). The influence of functional goals on the kinematics of reaching following stroke. Neurology Report, 19(1), 11-16.
47. von Hofsten, C. (1979). Development of visually directed reaching: The approach phase. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 5(4), 160-178.
48. Weir, P. L. (1994). Object property and task effects on prehension. In K. M. B. Bennett & U. Castiello (Eds.), Insights into the reach to grasp movement (pp. 129-150). Amsterdam: North Holland.
49. Williams, L., & Sullivan, J. (1986). Allocation of attention in movement. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 12(2), 71-88.
50. Wing, A. M., & Miller, E. (1984). Research note: Peak velocity timing invariance. Psychological Research, 46(1-2), 121-127.
51. Wu, C.-Y. (1995). Kinematic study of context effects on reaching movements in normal adults. Unpublished manuscript, Boston University.
52. Wu, C.-Y., Trombly, C. A., & Lin, K.-C. (1994). The relationship between occupational form and occupational performance: A kinematic perspective. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 679-687.