Interrater agreement on the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS)

Assessment

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 93-100

  Kurokawa, Nancy K S ^b   Weed, Nathan C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MENTAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PEER GROUP; PERCEPTION; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SELF EVALUATION; STANDARD;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PEER GROUP; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PSYCHOMETRICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SELF ASSESSMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SOCIAL PERCEPTION; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 0032012712     PISSN: 10731911     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107319119800500111     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Auerbach, S. M. (1989). Stress management and coping research in the health care setting: An overview and methodological commentary. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 388-395.
2. Cheek, J. M. (1982). Aggregation, moderator variables, and the validity of personality tests: A peer-rating study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1254-1269.
3. Cohen, J. (1978). Partialed products are interactions: Partialed powers are curve components. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 858-866.
4. Costa, P. T., Busch, C. M., Zonderman, A. B., & McCrae, R. R. (1986). Correlations of MMPI factor scales with measures of the five factor model of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 640-650.
5. Endler, N. S., & Parker, J. D. A. (1990a). Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS): Manual. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
6. Endler, N. S., & Parker, J. D. A. (1990b). Multidimensional assessment of coping: A critical review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 844-854.
7. Endler, N. S., & Parker, J. D. A. (1990c). State and trait anxiety, depression, and coping styles. Australian Journal of Psychology, 42, 207-220.
8. Endler, N. S., & Parker, J. D. A. (1994). Assessment of multidimensional coping: Task, emotion, and avoidance strategies. Psychological Assessment, 6, 50-60.
9. Endler, N. S., Parker, J. D. A., & Butcher, J. N. (1993). A factor analytical study of coping styles and the MMPI-2 content scales. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 523-527.
10. Funder, D. C., & Dobroth, K. M. (1987). Differences between traits: Properties associated with interjudge agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 409-418.
11. Gormly, J. (1984). Correspondence between personality trait ratings and behavioral events. Journal of Personality, 52, 220-232.
12. Janzen, B. L., Kelly, I. W., & Saklofske, D. H. (1992). Bulimic symptomatology and coping in a nonclinical sample. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 395-399.
13. Kenrick, D. T., & Funder, D. C. (1988). Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 43, 23-34.
14. Kenrick, D. T., & Stringfield, D. O. (1980). Personality traits and the eye of the beholder: Crossing some traditional philosophical boundaries in the search for consistency in all of the people. Psychological Review, 87, 88-104.
15. Lubinski, D., & Humphreys, L. G. (1990). Assessing spurious "moderator effects": Illustrated substantively with the hypothesized ("synergistic") relation between spatial and mathematical ability. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 385-393.
16. McCrae, R. R. (1982). Consensual validation of personality traits: Evidence from self-reports and ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 293-303.
17. McCrae, R. R. (1994). The counterpoint of personality assessment: Self-report and observer ratings. Assessment, 1, 159-172.
18. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Different points of view: Self-reports and ratings in the assessment of personality. In J. P. Forgas & M. J. Innes (Eds.), Recent advances in social psychology: An international perspective (pp. 429-439). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
19. Miller, S. M., Brody, D. S., & Summerton, J. (1988). Styles of coping with threat: Implications for health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 142-148.
20. Newcomb, T. M. (1978). The acquaintance process: Looking mainly backwards. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1075-1083.
21. Norman, W. T., & Goldberg, L. R. (1966). Raters, ratees, and randomness in personality structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 681-691.
22. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
23. Parker, J. D. A., & Endler, N. S. (1992). Coping with coping assessment: A critical review. European Journal of Personality, 6, 321-344.
24. Paulhus, D. L., & Bruce, M. N. (1992). The effect of acquaintanceship on the validity of personality impressions: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 816-824.
25. Watson, D. (1989). Strangers' ratings of the five robust personality factors: Evidence of a surprising convergence with self-report. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 120-128.
26. Wiggins, J. S. (1973). Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
27. Wright, P. H. (1985). The Acquaintance Description Form. In S. Duck & D. Perlman (Eds.), Understanding personal relationships: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 39-62). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
28. Wright, P. H. (1991). The acquaintance description form: What it is and how to use it. Unpublished manuscript, University of North Dakota at Grand Forks.
29. Zuckerman, M., Bernieri, F., Koestner, R., & Rosenthal, R. (1989). To predict some of the people some of the time: In search of moderators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 279-293.