Why Are Occupational Therapists Not Doing More Replication Research?

American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 234-235

  Ross, Lisa M ^a   Hall, Beth A ^a   Heater, Stephen L ^a  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF OHIO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RESEARCH;

HUMANS; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH;

EID: 0032012660     PISSN: 02729490     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5014/ajot.52.3.234     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Blomquist, K. B. (1986). Replication of research. Research in Nursing and Health, 9, 193-194.
2. Connelly, C. E. (1986). Replication research in nursing. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 23(1), 71-77.
3. Feldman, H. R. (1994). Developing nursing science: A case for replication. Journal of Professional Nursing, 10(2), 70.
4. Haller, K. B., & Reynolds, M. A. (1986). Using research in practice: A case for replication in nursing - part one. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 8(1), 113-116.
5. Mann, W. C. (1987). The Foundation - Replication. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 41, 127-129.
6. Nelson, D. L. (1997). Why the profession of occupational therapy will flourish in the 21st century, 1996 Eleanor Clarke Slagle lecture. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 11-24.
7. Ottenbacher, K. J. (1995). Why rehabilitation research does not work (as well as we think it should). Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 76, 123-129.
8. Ryland, R. K. (1989). A plea for replication studies. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 14, 699.