Methodological caveats for monitoring binocular eye position with Nonius stimuli

Vision Research

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 591-600

  Shimono, Koichi ^a   Ono, Hiroshi ^b,d   Saida, Shinya ^c   Mapp, Alistair P ^d  

^a Industry Canada   (Canada)

^b ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL   (Japan)

^c NATL INST BIOSCI HUM TECHNOL   (Japan)

^d YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Binocular vision; Eye position monitor; Nonius method; Visual direction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; EYE POSITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; CONVERGENCE, OCULAR; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; METHODS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 0032008279     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00168-5     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bradshaw, M. F. & Rogers, B. J. (1994). Is cyclovergence state affected by the inclination of stereoscopic surfaces? Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 35 (ARVO Abstract), 1316.
2. Charnwood, J. R. B. (1951). Essay on binocular vision. Halton: London.
3. Erkelens, C. J. & Collewijn, H. (1985). Motion perception during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms. Vision Research, 25, 583-588.
4. Erkelens, C. J. & van Ee, R. (1997a). Capture of visual direction: an unexpected phenomenon in binocular vision. Vision Research, 37, 1193-1196.
5. Erkelens, C. J. & van Ee, R. (1997b). Capture of the visual direction of monocular objects by adjacent binocular objects. Vision Research, 37, 1735-1745.
6. Grind van de, W. A., Erkelens, C. J. & Laan, A. C. (1995). Binocular correspondence and visual direction. Perception, 24, 215-235.
7. Howard, I. P. & Ohmi, M. (1992). A new interpretation of the role of dichoptic occlusion in stereopsis. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 33ARVO Abstract, 1370.
8. Howard, I. P. & Rogers, B. J. (1995). Binocular vision and stereopsis. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Kaufman, L. (1976). On stereopsis with double images. Psychologia, 19, 233-244.
10. Kertesz, A. E. & Lee, H. J. (1988). The nature of sensory compensation during fusional response. Vision Research, 28, 313-322.
11. McKee, S. P. & Levi, D. M. (1987). Dichoptic hyperacuity: the precision of nonius alignment. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 4, 1104-1108.
12. Nakayama, K. & Shimojo, S. (1990). Da Vinchi stereopsis: Depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points. Vision Research, 30, 1811-1825.
13. Ono, H. (1979). Axiomatic summary and deductions from Hering's principles of visual direction. Perception and Psychophysics, 25, 473-477.
14. Ono, H. (1983). The combination of version and vergence. In Schor, C. & Ciuffreda, K. J. (Eds), Vergence eye movements: basic and clinical aspects (pp. 373-400). Butterworth.
15. Ono, H. (1991). Binocular visual directions of an object when seen as single or double. In Regan, D. (Ed.), Vision and visual dysfunction, Vol 10S, Binocular vision (pp. 1-18). London: Macmillan.
16. Ono, H. (1993). Precision and accuracy in Perception. [Educational Computer Program Package.] Santa Barbara: Intellimation.
17. Ono, H. & Mapp, A. P. (1995). A restatement and modification of Wells-Hering's laws of visual direction. Perception, 24, 237-252.
18. Ono, H. Shimono, K. & Saida, S. (1997). Transformation of the visual-line value in binocular vision: Stimuli on corresponding points can be seen in two different visual directions. Manuscript submitted for publication.
19. Ono, H., Shimono, K. & Shibuta, K. (1992). Occlusion as a depth cue in the Wheatstone-Panum's limiting case. Perception and Psychophysics, 51, 3-13.
20. Remole, A., Code, S. M., Matyas, C. E., McLeod, M. A. & White, D. (1986). Objective measurement of binocular fixation misalignment. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 63, 631-638.
21. Robertson, K. & Schor, C. M. (1986). Changes in retinal correspondence induced by disparity vergence. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 27 Suppl., 79.
22. Shimono, K., Nakamizo, S. & Ida, T. (1994). Occlusion provides depth-order information but camouflage does not in the Wheatstone-Panum's limiting case. Perception, 23 Suppl., 39.
23. Sperling, G. (1970). Binocular vision: a physical and neural theory. American Journal of Psychology, 83, 461-534.
24. Werner, H. (1937). Dynamics in binocular depth perception. Psychological Monograph, 218, (whole number).
25. Woodworth, R. S. & Schlosberg, H., (1954). Experimental Psychology (revised). New York: Henry Holt and Company.