pH influence on root growth and nutrient uptake of Pinus pinaster seedlings

Chemosphere

Volumn 36, Issue 4-5, 1998, Pages 733-738

  Arduini, I ^a   Kettner, C ^b   Godbold, D L ^b   Onnis, A ^a   Stefani, A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^c SCUOLA SUPERIORE SANT ANNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM; MAGNESIUM; MANGANESE; POTASSIUM;

BIOMASS; CONFERENCE PAPER; NUTRIENT; PH; PINE; PLANT GROWTH; PLANT ROOT; THICKNESS;

PINUS PINASTER;

EID: 0032007636     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0045-6535(97)10116-3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. 1. A.K.M.S. Islam, D.G. Edwards and C.J. Asher, pH optima for crop growth. Results of a flowing solution culture experiment with six species, Plant Soil 54, 339-357 (1980).
2. 2. U. Falkengren-Grerup, M.E. Quist and G. Tyler, Relative importance of exchangeable and soil solution cation concentrations to the distribution of vascular plants, Environ. Experim. Bot. 35, 9-15 (1995).
3. 3. R. Gellini, Inquinamento ambientale e declino del bosco. La situazione in Italia e ricerche in corso. Proceedings of the international conference on Inquinamento atmosferico e declino del bosco, pp. 18-26, Tipogr. Coppini, Firenze (1991).
4. 4. B. Ulrich, Nutrient and acid base budget of central European forest ecosystems. In Effects of Acid Rain on Forest Processes (Edited by D.L. Godbold and A. Hüttermann). Pp. 1-50. Wiley, New York (1994).
5. 5. T.G. Tutin, V.H. Heywood, N.A. Burges, D.H. Valentine, S.M. Walters and D.A. Webb, Flora Europaea, vol. 1 p.33, (1964)
6. 6. A. Giacobbe, Il pino marittimo, pp. 1-199. Soc. Anonim. Ed. D. Alighieri, Città di Castello (PG) (1942).
7. 7. E. Saur, C. Lambrot, D. Loustau, N. Rotival and P. Trichet, Growth and uptake of mineral elements in response to sodium chloride of three provenances of maritime pine, J. Plant Nutr. 18, 243-256 (1995).
8. 8. N. Henig-Sever, A. Eshel and G. Ne'eman, pH and osmotic potential of pine ash as post-fire germination inhibitors, Physiol. Plant. 96, 71-76 (1996).
9. 9. E. Matzner, P.K. Khanna, K.J. Meiwes, M. Lindheim, J. Prenzel and B. Ulrich, Elementenflüsse in Waldökosystemen im Soiling - Datendocumentation, Gört. Bodenk. Ber. 71, 68-75 (1982).
10. 10. R. Vangelisti, L. Viegi and G. Cela Renzoni, Responses of Pinus pinea and P. pinaster seedling roots to substrata at different pH values, Ann. Bot. Fennici 32, 19-27 (1995).
11. 11. H.H. Krause, Nutrient form and availability in the root environment. In Mineral Nutrition of Conifer Seedlings (Edited by R. Van Den Driessche). p. 274. CRC Press, Boston (1991).
12. 12. P. Nosko and K. A. Kershaw, The influence of pH on the toxicity of a low concentration of aluminium to white spruce seedlings, Can. J. Bot. 70, 1488-1492 (1992).
13. 13. H. Marschner, Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants (2nd Edition). Acad. Press, London (1995).
14. 14. V.V. Rendig and H.M. Taylor, Principles of Soil-Plant Interrelationships. Mc Graw-Hill, Inc., USA (1989).
15. 15. H. Koyama, T. Toda, S. Yokota, Z. Dawair and T. Hara, Effects of aluminium and pH on root growth and cell viability in Arabidopsis thaliana strain Landsberg in hydroponic culture, Plant Cell Physiol. 36, 201-205 (1995).
16. 16. D.R.R. Malkanthi, M. Moritsugu and K. Yokoyama, Effects of low pH and A1 on absorption and translocation of some essential nutrients in excised barley roots, Soil. Sci. Plant Nutr, 41, 253-262 (1995).
17. 17. F.C. Thornton, M. Schaedle and J. Raynal, Effects of aluminium on red spruce seedlings in solution culture, Environ. Experim. Bot. 27, 489-498 (1987).