Visual and nonvisual variables implicated in monovision wear

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 119-125

  Toit, Rènée Du ^b   Ferreira, Jannie T ^a   Nel, Zak J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG   (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Monovision; Personality factors; Presbyopia; Stereopsis; Visual requirements

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; LIGHT REFRACTION; VISION;

MONOVISION WEAR;

CONTACT LENSES;

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MONOCULAR VISION; PERSONALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; SUPEREGO; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; CONTACT LENSES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PRESBYOPIA; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFRACTION, OCULAR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISION, MONOCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 0032005376     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199802000-00015     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Papas EB. The presbyope and the contact lens: a fatal attraction. J Br Contact Lens Assoc 1991;14:51-4.
2. Harris MG, Classe JG. Clinicolegal considerations of monovision. J Am Optom Assoc 1988;59:491-5.
3. Woods RL. The aging eye and contact lenses - a review of ocular characteristics. J Br Contact Lens Assoc 1991;14:115-27.
4. Back AP, Woods R, Holden BA. The comparative visual performance of monovision and various concentric bifocals. Trans Br Contact Lens Assoc Conf 1987;4:46-7.
5. Schor C, Carson M, Peterson G, Suzuki J, Erickson P. Effects of interocular blur suppression ability on monovision task performance. J Am Optom Assoc 1989;60:188-92.
6. Erickson P, Schor C. Visual function with presbyopic contact lens correction. Optom Vis Sci 1990;67:22-8.
7. MacAlister GO,Woods CA. Monovision versus RGP translating bifocals. J Br Contact Lens Assoc 1991;14:173-8
8. Papas EB, Young G, Hearn K. Monovision versus diffractive bifocals. Trans Br Contact Lens Assoc Conf 1989;6:75-6.
9. Josephson JE. The monovision controversy. Trans Br Contact Lens Assoc Conf 1989;6:60-5.
10. Simpson TL, Richter DB, Fonn D. A clinical test of the interocular suppression of uniocular blur: test repeatability. Ophthal Physiol Opt, in press, 1997.
11. Morrison R. Simultaneous imagery in soft contact lenses. Trans Br Contact Lens Assoc Conf 1986;3:76-80.
12. Snyder C. Monovision: a clinical view. Spectrum 1989;4:30-6.