Effects of increased geometric complexity on the comparison between computational and experimental simulations

Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 159-179

  Byrne, C E I ^a   Holdo, A E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA REDUCTION; INTAKE SYSTEMS;

INLET BOUNDARY;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; GEOMETRICAL EFFECT; MODELING ERROR; TURBULENCE;

ERRORS; FLOW MODELING; FLUID MECHANICS; TURBULENCE;

EID: 0032004116     PISSN: 01676105     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00284-5     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. J.E. Cermak, Physical modelling of the atmospheric boundary layer in long boundary-layer wind tunnels, Proc. Int. Workshop on Wind Tunnel Criteria and Techniques in Civil Engineering Applications, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 1982.
2. H. Schlichting, Boundary-Layer Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1955.
3. J. Counihan, An improved method of simulating an atmospheric boundary layer in a wind tunnel, Atmos. Envir. 7 (1973) 673-689.
4. N.M. Standen, A spire array for generating thick turbulent shear layers for natural wind simulation in wind tunnels, Technical Report LTR-LA-94, National Aeronautical Establishment, Ottawa, Canada, 1972.
5. B.E. Launder, D.B. Spalding, Lectures in Mathematical Models of Turbulence, Academic Press, New York, 1972.
6. H. Reichardt, Vollstandige Darstellung der turbulten Gesschwingigkeilsverteilung, Z.A.M.M. 31 (1957) 208-219.
7. J.O. Hinze, Turbulence, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1989.
8. J.P. Johnston, in: P. Bradshaw (Ed.), Internal Flows, Topics in Applied Physics, Vol. 12, Turbulence, Springer, Berlin, 1978, pp. 124-126