Use of software systems development methods an empirical study in Brunei Darussalam

Information and Software Technology

Volumn 39, Issue 14-15, 1998, Pages 949-963

  Rahim, Md Mahbubur ^a   Seyal, Afzaal H ^a   Rahman, Mohd Noah Abd ^a  

^a FACULTY OF ENGINEERING   (Brunei Darussalam)

Author keywords

Method; Software development; Software systems

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

SOFTWARE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT METHODS;

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0032000243     PISSN: 09505849     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0950-5849(97)00052-9     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. A. Poulymenakou, A. Holmes, A contingency framework for the investigation of IS failure, European Journal of Information Systems 5 (1996) 34-46.
2. D. Batra, G.M. Marakas, Conceptual data modelling in theory and practice, European Journal of Information Systems 4 (1995) 185-193.
3. J.A. Bubenko, Information systems methodologies - a research view, In: T.W. Ollie, H.G. Sol, A.A. Verrijn-Stuart(Eds.), Information Systems Methodologies: Improving the Practice, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1986, pp. 289-318.
4. M.C. Winter, D.H. Brown, P.B. Checkland, A role for soft systems methodology in information systems development, European Journal of Information Systems 4 (1995) 130-142.
5. J.M. Carey, R. McCleod, Use of systems development methodology and tools, Journal of Systems Management March (1988) 30-35.
6. C.J. Hardy, J.B. Thompson, H.M. Edwards, The use, limitations and customisation of structured systems development methods on the United Kingdom, Information and Software Technology 37 (9) (1995) 467-477.
7. D. Wastell, A. Sewards, An information system profile of the UK manufacturing sector, Journal of Information Technology 10 (1995) 179-189.
8. Brunei Darussalam Statistical Yearbook, Statistic Review Economy Planning Unit, Ministry of Finance, 1993.
9. Country profile, Malaysia and Brunei 1994-95, The Economist Intelligence Unit, 1995.
10. G.B. Langle, R.L. Leitheiser, J.D. Naumann, A survey of applications systems: prototyping in industry, Information and Management 7 (1984) 273-284.
11. J.M. Carey, J.D. Currey, The prototyping conundrum, Datamation June (1989) 25-33.
12. E.R. Doke, Application development productivity tools: A survey of importance and popularity, Journal of Information Systems Management Winter (1989) 37-43.
13. T. Saarinen, System development methodology and project success, Information and Management 19 (1990) 183-193.
14. B.C. Hardgrave, R.L. Wilson, An investigation of guidelines for selecting a prototyping strategy, Journal of Systems Management April (1994) 28-35.
15. M.H. Selamat, M.M. Rahim, M.N. Maizura, Perceptions of selected Malaysian information systems practitioners towards software prototyping: An exploratory study, Malaysian Journal of Computer Science 9 (2) (1996) 14-28.
16. A.M. Jenkins, Empirical investigation of systems development practices and results, Information and Management 7 (1984) 73-82.
17. T. Guimaraes, A study of application program development techniques?, Communications of the ACM 28 (1985) 494-499.
18. M. Sumner, J. Sitek, Are structured methods for systems analysis and design being used?, Journal of Systems Management June (1986) 18-27.
19. P. Palvia, J.T. Nosek, A field examination of system life cycle techniques and methodologies?, Information and Management 25 (1993) 73-84.
20. Price Waterhouse, Software Quality Standards: The Costs and Benefits, Price Waterhouse Management Consultants, London, 1988.
21. J. Holt, Current practice in software engineering: A survey, Computer and Control Journal August (1997) 167-172.
22. A. Rouse, D. Watson, A. Gilbert, R. Dilnutt, Systems development practices: A comparison of the experience of Australians and United States, In: Proc. of 1995 Pan Pacific Conference en Information Systems, June 29-July 2, Singapore, 1995, pp. 46-56.
23. M.H. Selamat, M.M. Rahim, A.T. Othman, Managing implementation of CASE tools, In: Proceedings of the Third Conference on IT and its Applications 94, April 2-3, Leicester, UK. 1994, pp. 47-55.
24. L. Willcocks, Evaluating information technology investments: research findings and reappraisal, Journal of Information Systems 2 (1992) 243-268.
25. W.L. Currie, Organisational structure and the use of information technology: preliminary findings of s survey in the private and public sector, International Journal of Information Management 16 (1) (1996) 51-64.
26. G. Premkumar, An empirical study of IS planning characteristics at common industries, OMEGA 20 (1992) 611-629
27. J. Child, R. Mansfield, Technology size and organisation structure, Sociology (1972) 369-393.
28. J.D. Aaron, Information systems in perspective, Computing Surveys December (1969) 213-236.
29. G.M. West, MIS in small companies, Journal of Systems Management 14 (1975) 10-13.
30. P. Ein-Dor, E. Segev, Organisation context and the success of MIS, Management Science 24 (1978) 1064-1077.
31. V. Grover, J.T.C. Teng, An examination of DBMS adoption and success in American organisations, Information and Management 23 (5) (1992) 239-248.
32. M.K. Moch, E.V. Morse, Size, centralisation and organisational adoption of innovations, American Sociological Review 42 (1977) 716-725.
33. C.F. Gibson, R.L. Nolan, Managing the four stages of EDP growth, Harvard Business Review 58 (1) (1974) 76-88.
34. M.C. Jones, K.P. Arnett, Current practices in management information systems, Information and Management 24 (1993) 61-69.
35. C.R. Franz, D. Robey, Organisational context, user involvement and the usefulness of information systems, Decision Science 17 (1986) 329-356.
36. J.E. Cline, M.A. Ketabchi, J. Link, P. Palvia, T.W. Olle, IRM and the systems life cycle, Database Engineering June (1986) 43-48.
37. C. Allen, T.C.D. Schewe, G. Wijk, Foot technique in the pre-call/mail survey setting, Journal of Marketing Research XVII (1980) 489-502.
38. M.A. Jackson, System Development, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, 1983.