Lexical accommodation in human- and machine-interpreted dialogues

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 217-246

  Fais, Laurel ^a  

^a ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; USER INTERFACES;

COMMUNICATIONAL EFFICIENCY; LEXICAL ACCOMMODATION;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 0031997379     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.1997.0165     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. BALL, J. E. & LING, D. T. (1995). Spoken language processing in the Persona Conversational Assistant. Proceedings of the ESCA Workshop on Spoken Dialogue Systems, pp. 109-112. Vigsø, Denmark.
2. BERTENSTAM, J., BESKOW, J., BLOMBERG, M., CARLSON, R., ELENIUS, K., GRANSTRÖM, B., GUSTAFSON, J., HUNNICUT, S., HÖGBERG, J., LINDELL, R., NEOVIUS, L., NORD, L., DE SERPALEITAO, A. & STRÖM, N. (1995). The Waxholm system: a progress report. Proceedings of the ESCA Workshop on Spoken Dialogue Systems, pp. 81-84. Vigsø, Denmark.
3. BOLINGER, D. (1973). That's That. The Hague: Mouton.
4. CLARK, H. H, & WILKES-GIBBS, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1-39.
5. COHEN, P. & OVIATT, S. (1993). The role of voice in human-machine communication. In D. B. ROE & J. WILPON, Eds. Human-Computer Interaction by Voice, Chap. 1. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press.
6. DANZINGER, K. (1976). Interpersonal Communication. New York: Pergamon Press.
7. DYBKJAER, L. (1995). Scenario design for spoken language dialogue systems development. Proceedings of the ESCA Workshop on Spoken Dialogue Systems, pp. 93-96. Vigsø, Denmark.
8. FAIS, L. (1994). Conversation as collaboration: some syntactic evidence. Speech Communication, 15, 231-242.
9. FAIS, L. & LOKEN-KIM, K-h. (1994). Effects of communicative mode on spontaneous English speech. Technical Report Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers.
10. FAIS, L., LOKEN-KIM, K-h. & MORIMOTO, T. (1996) Linguistic and para-linguistic differences between multimodal and telephone-only dialogues in English and Japanese. Journal of Acoustical Society of Japan (E), 17, 229-238.
11. FAIS, L., LOKEN-KIM, K-h. & PARK, Y.-D. (1995). Speakers' responses to requests for repetition in a multimedia cooperative dialogue. Proceedings of the International Conference on Cooperative Multimodal Communication, pp. 129-144. Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
12. GARROD, S. & ANDERSON, A. (1987). Saying what you mean in dialogue: a study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition, 22, 181-218.
13. GARROD, S. & DOHERTY, G. (1994). Conversation, coordination, and convention: an empirical investigation of how groups establish linguistic conventions. Cognition, 53, 181-215.
14. GILES, H., MULAC, A., BRADAC, J. J. & JOHNSON, P. (1987). Speech accommodation theory: the first decade and beyond. In M. L. MCLAUGHLIN, Ed. Communication Yearbook 10, pp. 13-48. London, UK; Sage.
15. JAFFE, J. (1964). Verbal behavior analysis in psychiatric interviews with the aid of digital computers. In D. MCK. RIOCH & E. A. WEINSTEIN, Eds. Disorders of Communication, pp. 389-399. Blatimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.
16. KIESLER, S., SPROULL, L. & WATERS, K. (1996). A prisoner's dilemma experiment on cooperation with people and human-like computers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 47-65.
17. KUHN, R. & DE MORI, R. (1990). A cache-based natural language model for speech recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligences 12, 570-583.
18. LEE, K-F. (1989). Automatic Speech Recognition: The Development of the SPHINX System. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
19. LEHMAN, J. F. & CARBONELL, J. G. (1989). Learning the user's language: A step towards automated creation of user models. In A. KOBSA & W. WAHLSTER, Eds. User Models in Dialogue Systems, pp. 163-194. Berlin: Springer.
20. LEISER, R. G. (1989). Exploiting convergence to improve natural language understanding. Interacting with Computers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 284-298.
21. LOKEN-KIM, K-h., YATO, F., KURIHARA, K., FAIS, L. & FURUKAWA, R. (1993). EMMI - ATR environment for multi-modal interactions. ATR Technical Report TR-IT-0018, ATR Interpreting Telecommunications Research Laboratories, Kyoto, Japan.
22. MELLOR, B. & O'CONNOR, C. (1995). User adaptation to voice input interfaces. Proceedings of the ESCA Workshop on Spoken Dialogue Systems, pp. 97-100. Vigsø, Denmark.
23. OVIATT, S. (1995). Predicting spoken disfluencies during human-computer interaction. Computer Speech and Langauge, 9, 19-35.
24. OVIATT, S. L. & COHEN, P. R. (1992). Spoken language in interpreted telephone dialogues. Computer Speech and Language, 6, 277-302.
25. SLATOR, B. M., ANDERSON, M. P. & CONLEY, W. (1986). Pygmalion at the interface. Communications of the ACM, 29, 499-514.
26. SPITZ, J. & the Artificial Intelligence Speech Technology Group. (1991). Collection and analysis of data from real users; implications for speech recognition/understanding systems. Proceedings of the 4th Darpa Workshop on Speech and Natural Language, pp. 164-169. Asilomar, CA, USA.
27. SUHM, B., LEVIN, L., COCCARO, N., CARBONELL, J., HORIGUCHI, K., ISOTANI, R., LAVIE, A., MAYFIELD, L., ROSÉ, C. P., VAN ESS-DYKEMA, C. & WAIBEL, A. (1994). Speech-language integration in a multi-lingual speech translation system. Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Speech and Language Processing, Seattle, WA, USA.
28. WEBBER, B. (1995). Instructing animated agents: Viewing language in behavioral terms. Proceedings of the International Conference on Cooperative Multimodal Communication, pp. 5-15. Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
29. ZOLTAN-FORD, E. (1991) How to get people to say and type what computers can understand. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 527-547.