A promising approach to two-person software review in educational environment

Journal of Systems and Software

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 115-123

  Kusumoto, Shinji ^a   Chimura, Atsushi ^b   Kikuno, Tohru ^b   Matsumoto, Ken Ichi ^b   Mohri, Yukio ^b  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; EDUCATION; ERROR CORRECTION; PROGRAM DEBUGGING;

TECHNICAL REVIEW;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0031997289     PISSN: 01641212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0164-1212(97)00004-6     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bisant, D. B. and Lyle, J. R., A two-person inspection method to improve programming productivity. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, 15, 1294-1304 (1989).
2. Collofello, J. S. and Woodfield, S. N., Evaluating the effectiveness of reliability-assurance techniques. Journal of Systems & Software, 9, 191-195 (1989).
3. Fagan, M. E., Design and code inspections to reduce errors in program development. IBM Syst. J., 15, 182-211 (1976).
4. Frakes, W. B., Fox, C. J. and Nejmeh, B. A., Software Engineering in the UNIX/C Environment, Prentice-Hall, 1991.
5. Freedman, D. P. and Weinberg, G. M., Handbook of Walkthroughs, Inspections and Technical Reviews, Little Brown and Company, 1982.
6. IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology, IEEE, ANSI/IEEE Std 729-1983 (1983).
7. IEEE Standard for Software Reviews and Audits, IEEE, ANSI/IEEE Std 1028-1988 (1988).
8. Knight, J. C. and Myers, E. A., An improved inspection technique. Communication of the ACM, 36, 11, 51-61 (1993).
9. Kusumoto, S., Matsumoto, K., Kikuno, T. and Torii, K., On a measurement environment for controlling software development activities. Trans. on IEICE, E74, No. 5, 1051-1054 (1991).
10. Kusumoto, S., Matsumoto, K., Kikuno, T. and Torii, K., A new metric for cost effectiveness of software reviews. Trans. on IEICE, E75-D, 5, 674-680 (1992).
11. Kusumoto, S., Matsumoto, K., Kikuno, T. and Tanaka, K., Improvement of software development process by using fault tolerant techniques. Journal of Computer Systems Science & Engineering, 9, 83-88 (1994).
12. Kusumoto, S., Matsumoto, K., Kikuno, T. and Torii, K., Experimental evaluation of time allocation procedure for technical reviews. Journal of Systems & Software (1996) (in press).
13. Martin, J. and McClure, C., Action Diagrams, Prentice-Hall, 1985.
14. Mohri, Y., Kikuno, T. and Torii, K., Evaluation of making check list used in technical review. Proc. of the 11th Software Reliability Symposium, pp. 7-11 (1990) (in Japanese).
15. Mohri, Y. and Kikuno, T., Fault analysis based on fault reporting in JSP software development. Proc. of COMPSAC91, 591-596 (1991).
16. Myers, G. J., A controlled experiment in program testing and code walkthroughs/inspections. Communications of the ACM, 21, 9, 760-768 (1978).
17. Porter, A. A., Votta, L. G. and Basili, V. R., Comparing detection methods for software requirements inspections: A replicated experiment. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, 21, 563-575 (1995).
18. Shiba, Y., Watanabe, H. and Ishizuka, T., Statistical dictionary, Shinyousha, 1984 (in Japanese).