Hispanic and African American reactions to a simulated race-based affirmative action scenario

Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 3-16

  Stanush, Pamela ^b   Arthur Jr , Winfred ^c   Doverspike, Dennis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

^b HR Directories Inc   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031994938     PISSN: 07399863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/07399863980201001     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Arthur, W., Jr., Doverspike, D., & Fuentes, R. (1992). Recipients' affective responses to affirmative action interventions: A cross-cultural perspective. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 10, 229-243.
2. Austin, W., Friedman, J. S., Martz, R. A., Hooe, G. S., & Ball, K. P. (1977). Responses to favorable sex discrimination. Law and Human Behavior, 1, 283-298.
3. Chacko, T. I. (1982). Women and equal opportunity: Some unintended effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 119-123.
4. Cox, T. H., & Nkomo, S. M. (1990). Invisible men and women: A status report on race as a variable in organization behavior research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 419-431.
5. Doverspike, D., & Arthur, W., Jr. (1995). Race and sex difference in reactions to a simulated selection decision involving race-based affirmative action. Journal of Black Psychology, 21, 181-200.
6. Heilman, M. E., Kaplow, S. R., Amato, M. A., & Stathatos, P. (1993). When similarity is a liability: Effects of sex-based preferential selection on reactions to like-sex and different-sex others. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 917-927.
7. Heilman, M. E., Lucas, J. A., & Kaplow, S. R. (1990). Self-derogating consequences of sex-based preferential selection: The moderating role of initial self-confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 202-216.
8. Heilman, M. E., Simon, M. C., & Repper, D. P. (1987). Intentionally favored, unintentionally harmed? Impact of sex-based preferential selection on self-perceptions and self-evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 62-68.
9. Jencks, C. (1985). Affirmative action for Blacks. American Behavioral Scientist, 28, 731-760.
10. Kanellos, N. (1993). The Hispanic-American almanac: A reference work on Hispanics in the United States. Detroit, MI: Gale Research.
11. Kravitz, D. A. (1995). Attitudes toward affirmative action plans directed at Blacks: Effects of plan and individual differences. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 2192-2220.
12. Kravitz, D. A., & Meyer, B. (1996, April). Reactions of Hispanics to affirmative action programs directed at Hispanics. Poster paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.
13. Kravitz, D. A., & Platania, J. (1993). Attitudes and beliefs about affirmative action: Effects of target and of respondent sex and ethnicity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 928-938.
14. Kravitz, D. A., Stinson, V., & Mello, E. W. (1994, August). Public reactions to affirmative action. Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Dallas, TX.
15. Nacoste, R. (1985). Selection procedure and responses to affirmative action: The case of favorable treatment. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 225-242.
16. Nacoste, R. W. (1989). Affirmative action and self-evaluation. In F. Blanchard & F. Crosby (Eds.), Affirmative action in perspective (pp. 103-109). New York: Springer-Verlag.
17. Nacoste, R. W. (1990). Sources of stigma: Analyzing the psychology of affirmative action. Law and Policy, 12, 115-195.
18. Nacoste, R. W., & Lehman, D. (1987). Procedural stigma. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 17, 25-38.
19. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20. Sowell, T. (1976). Affirmative action reconsidered. The Public Interest, 42, 47-63.
21. Taylor-Carter, M. A., Doverspike, D., & Cook, K. (1995). Understanding resistance to sex- and race-based affirmative action: A review of research findings. Human Resource Management Review, 5, 129-157.