Teaching and research quality indicators and the shaping of higher education

Research in Higher Education

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 19-41

  Patrick, William J ^a   Stanley, Elizabeth C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031993596     PISSN: 03610365     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1018700327881     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Astin, A. W., and Chang, M. J. (1995). Colleges that emphasize research and teaching. Change 27 (5): 45-49.
2. Barnett, R. (1990). The Idea of Higher Education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
3. Bensman, S., Hamaker, C. A., and Wilder, S. J. (1997). The Louisiana State University Serials Redesign Project: An Exercise in Optimization. Manuscript in preparation.
4. Braxton, J. M. (ed.) (1996a). Faculty Teaching and Research: Is There a Conflict? New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 90. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Braxton, J. M. (1996b). Contrasting perspectives in the relationship between teaching and research. In J. M. Braxton (ed.), Faculty Teaching and Research: Is There a Conflict? New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 90, pp. 5-14. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Court, S. (1996, April). The Research Assessment Exercise: The Basis for an Unofficial Gold Standard in Higher Education? Paper presented to "The Dilemmas of Mass Higher Education" conference at Staffordshire University at Stoke-on-Trent.
7. de Groot, H., McMahon, W. W., and Volkwein, J. F. (1991). The cost structure of American research universities. Review of Economics and Statistics 73 (3): 424-431.
8. Department for Education and Employment (1997). The Size and Structure of Higher Education. Evidence to the National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education (the "Dearing Committee"), January 1997. London: Author.
9. Dill, D. D., Massey, W. F., Williams, P. R., and Cook, C. M. (1996). Accreditation and academic quality assurance: Can we get there from here? Change 28 (5): 17-24.
10. Everitt, B. S. (1993). Cluster Analysis. New York and Toronto: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
11. Feldman, K. A. (1987). Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: A review and exploration. Research in Higher Education 26 (3): 227-297.
12. Fogel, D. (1996). Uses of the NRC Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs. Presentation in panel discussion at the 36th Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
13. Gibbs, G. (1995a). The relationship between quality in research and quality in teaching. Quality in Higher Education 1 (2): 147-157.
14. Gibbs, G. (1995b). Promoting excellent teaching is harder than you'd think. Change 27 (3): 17-20.
15. Goldberger, M. L., Maher, B. A., and Flattau, P. E. (eds.) (1995). Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. Goldstein, H., and Spiegelhalter, D. J. (1996). League tables and their limitations: Statistical issues in comparisons of institutional performance. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (159 Part 3): 385-443.
17. Graham, H. D., and Diamond, N. (1997). The Rise of American Research Universities: Elites and Challengers in the Postwar Era. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
18. Higher Education Funding Council for England (1994). The Quality Assessment Method from April 1995. Circular 39/94. Bristol: Author.
19. Higher Education Funding Council for England (1995). Report on Quality Assessment 1992-95. Bristol: Author.
20. Higher Education Funding Council for England (1997). Report on Quality Assessment 1995-96. Bristol: Author.
21. Higher Education Funding Councils (1994a). 1996 Research Assessment Exercise. Circular RAE96 1/94. Bristol: Authors.
22. Higher Education Funding Councils (1994b). 1996 Research Assessment Exercise: Units of Assessment. Circular RAE96 3/94. Bristol: Authors.
23. Higher Education Funding Councils (1995). 1996 Research Assessment Exercise: Criteria for Assessment. Circular RAE96 3/95. Bristol: Authors.
24. Higher Education Funding Councils (1996). 1996 Research Assessment Exercise: The Outcome. Circular RAE96 1/96. Bristol: Authors.
25. Joint Planning Group for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (1996a). First Report. April 1996. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England.
26. Joint Planning Group for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (1996b). Final Report. September 1996. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England.
27. Jones, L. V., Lindzey, G., and Coggeshall, P. E. (1982). An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
28. Kaufman, L., and Rousseeuw, P. J. (1990). Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
29. Maher, B. A. (1996). The NRC's report on research-doctorate programs: Its uses and misuses. Change 28 (6): 54-59.
30. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science 159 (1): 56-63.
31. Midwinter, J. E. (1997). A question of quality. IEE (Institution of Electrical Engineers) Review 43 (2): 66-70.
32. National Academies Policy Advisory Group (1996). Research Capability of the University System. London: Author.
33. North Central Association (1994). Handbook of Accreditation 1994-96. Chicago: Author.
34. Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (1993). Realising Our Potential: A Strategy for Science, Engineering and Technology. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
35. Patrick, W. J., and Stanley, E. C. (1996). Assessment of research quality. Research in Higher Education 37 (1): 23-42.
36. Rogers, E., and Rogers, S. J. (1997). "High science" vs. "Just selling magazines"?: How the NRC and U.S. News graduate rankings compare. AAHE Bulletin 49 (9): 7-10.
37. Scottish Higher Education Funding Council (1996). Quality Assessment 1996-97: The SHEFC Approach. Edinburgh: Author.
38. SPSS Inc. (1994). SPSS Professional Statistics™ 6.1. Chicago: Author.
39. Taylor, J. (1995). A statistical analysis of the 1992 research assessment exercise. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 158(Part 2): 241-261.
40. Terenzini, P. T., and Pascarella, E. T. (1994). Living with myths: Undergraduate education in America. Change 26 (1): 28-32.
41. Universities Funding Council (1992). Research Assessment Exercise 1992: The Outcome. Circular letter 26/92. Bristol: Author.
42. Universities Statistical Record (1995). University Statistics 1993-1994: Volume Three: Finance. Cheltenham: Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (USR Publications).
43. Volkwein, J. F., and Carbone, D. A. (1994). The impact of departmental research and teaching climates on undergraduate growth and satisfaction. Journal of Higher Education 65 (12): 147-167.
44. Webster, D. S., and Skinner, T. (1996a). Rating Ph.D. programs: What the NRC report says . . . and doesn't say. Change 28 (3): 22-44.
45. Webster, D. S., and Skinner, T. (1996b). Webster and Skinner respond. Change 28 (6): 59.
46. Yorke, M. (1996). Shouldn't quality be enhanced, rather than assessed? Tertiary Education and Management 2(1): 86-94.