Canonical structure of classical field theory in the polymomentum phase space

Reports on Mathematical Physics

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 49-90

  Kanatchikov, Igor V ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF FUNDAMENTAL TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (Poland)

Author keywords

Classical field theory; De Donder Weyl theory; Differential forms; Gerstenhaber algebra; Hamiltonian formalism; Multivector fields; Poincar Cartan form; Poisson bracket; Polysymplectic form; Schouten Nijenhuis bracket

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031993512     PISSN: 00344877     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0034-4877(98)80182-1     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. [1] Č. Crnković and E. Witten: Covariant description of canonical formalism in geometrical theories, in 300 Years of Gravitation, eds. S. W. Hawking and W. Israel, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1987, p. 676-684. Č. Crnković: Class. Quantum Gravity 5 (1988), 1557-1575.
2. [1] Č. Crnković and E. Witten: Covariant description of canonical formalism in geometrical theories, in 300 Years of Gravitation, eds. S. W. Hawking and W. Israel, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1987, p. 676-684. Č. Crnković: Class. Quantum Gravity 5 (1988), 1557-1575.
3. [2] R. Abraham and J. E. Marsden: Foundations of Mechanics, 2-nd ed., Benjamin and Cummings, New York 1978.
4. [3] P. Chernoff and J. Marsden: Properties of Infinite Dimensional Hamiltonian Systems, Lect. Notes Math. vol. 425, Springer, Berlin 1974.
5. [4] C. Itzykson and J.-B. Zuber: Quantum Field Theory, Mc Graw-Hill Book Co., New York 1980.
6. [5] P. J. Olver: Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations, Springer, New York 1986.
7. [6] Th. De Donder: Theorie Invariantive du Calcul des Variations, Nouv. éd., Gauthier-Villars, Paris 1935.
8. [7] H. Weyl: Ann. Math. (2) 36 (1935), 607-629.
9. [8] C. Carathéodory: Über die extremalen und geodätischen Felder in der Variationsrechnung der mehrfachen Integrale, Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 4 (1929,) 193-216.
10. [9] H. Rund: The Hamilton-Jacobi Theory in the Calculus of Variations, D. van Nostrand̀, Toronto 1966 [Revised and augmented reprint, Krieger Publ, New York 1973].
11. [10] H. Kastrup: Phys. Rep. 101 (1983), 1-167.
12. [11] E. Binz, J. Śniatycki and H. Fisher: Geometry of Classical Fields, North-Holland, Amsterdam 1989.
13. [12] M. Giaquinta and S. Hilderbrandt: Calculus of Variations, vols. 1,2, Springer, Berlin 1995/6.
14. [13] M. J. Gotay: An exterior differential systems approach to the Cartan form, in Symplectic Geometry and Mathematical Physics, eds. P. Donato, C. Duval, et al., Birkhäuser, Boston 1991, p. 160-188.
15. [14] M. J. Gotay: A multisymplectic framework for classical field theory and the calculus of variations I. Covariant Hamiltonian formalism, in Mechanics. Analysis and Geometry: 200 Years after Lagrange, ed. M. Francaviglia, North Holland, Amsterdam 1991, p. 203-235.
16. [15] M. J. Gotay: Diff. Geom. Appl. 1 (1991), 375-390.
17. [16] M. J. Gotay, J. Isenberg, J. Marsden and R. Montgomery: Momentum Maps and Classical Relativistic Fields (Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Structure of Classical Field Theories with Constraints), book in preparation, Berkeley 1992 (various versions are known since 1985 as the GIMMSY paper), to appear.
18. [17] H. Rund: A Cartan form for the field theory of Caratheodory in the calculus of variations of multiple integrals, in Differential Geometry, Calculus of Variations and Their Applications, Lect. Notes Pure and Appl. Math. vol. 100, ed. G. M. Rassias and T. M. Rassias, Marcel Dekker 1985, p. 455-469.
19. [18] J. Śniatycki: Rep. Math. Phys. 19 (1984), 407-422.
20. [19] J. Kijowski: private communication (March 1995).
21. [20] J. Kijowski and W. M. Tulczyjew: A Symplectic Framework for Field Theories, Springer, Berlin 1979.
22. [21] J. von Rieth: J. Math. Phys. 25 (1984), 1102-1115.
23. [22] D. R. Grigore: Fortschr. Phys. 41 (1993), 569-617.
24. [23] J. Kijowski and G. Rudolph: Rep. Math. Phys. 20 (1984), 385-400.
25. [24] G. Sardanashvily and O. Zakharov: Int. J. Theor. Phys. 31 (1992), 1477-1504; G. Sardanashvily: Gauge Theory in Jet Manifolds, Hadronic Press Inc., Palm Harbor 1993; G. Sardanashvily: Multimomentum Hamiltonian formalism in field theory, preprint hep-th/9403172; G. Sardanashvily: Generalized Hamiltonian Formalism for Field Theory, World Scientific, Singapore 1995.
26. [24] G. Sardanashvily and O. Zakharov: Int. J. Theor. Phys. 31 (1992), 1477-1504; G. Sardanashvily: Gauge Theory in Jet Manifolds, Hadronic Press Inc., Palm Harbor 1993; G. Sardanashvily: Multimomentum Hamiltonian formalism in field theory, preprint hep-th/9403172; G. Sardanashvily: Generalized Hamiltonian Formalism for Field Theory, World Scientific, Singapore 1995.
27. [24] G. Sardanashvily and O. Zakharov: Int. J. Theor. Phys. 31 (1992), 1477-1504; G. Sardanashvily: Gauge Theory in Jet Manifolds, Hadronic Press Inc., Palm Harbor 1993; G. Sardanashvily: Multimomentum Hamiltonian formalism in field theory, preprint hep-th/9403172; G. Sardanashvily: Generalized Hamiltonian Formalism for Field Theory, World Scientific, Singapore 1995.
28. [24] G. Sardanashvily and O. Zakharov: Int. J. Theor. Phys. 31 (1992), 1477-1504; G. Sardanashvily: Gauge Theory in Jet Manifolds, Hadronic Press Inc., Palm Harbor 1993; G. Sardanashvily: Multimomentum Hamiltonian formalism in field theory, preprint hep-th/9403172; G. Sardanashvily: Generalized Hamiltonian Formalism for Field Theory, World Scientific, Singapore 1995.
29. [25] G. Sardanashvily: Multimomentum Hamiltonian formalism in quantum field theory, preprint hep-th/9404001.
30. [26] R. H. Good: J. Math. Phys. 35 (1994), 3333-3339; ibid. 36 (1995), 707-713.
31. [26] R. H. Good: J. Math. Phys. 35 (1994), 3333-3339; ibid. 36 (1995), 707-713.
32. [27] M. Navarro: Comments on Good's proposal for new rules of quantization, preprint Imperial-TP/94-95//25, hep-th/9503068.
33. [28] H. Kastrup: Phys. Lett. 82B (1979), 237-238; H. Kastrup and M. Rinke: Phys. Lett. 105B (1981), 191-196; M. Rinke: Commun. Math. Phys. 73 (1980), 265-271.
34. [28] H. Kastrup: Phys. Lett. 82B (1979), 237-238; H. Kastrup and M. Rinke: Phys. Lett. 105B (1981), 191-196; M. Rinke: Commun. Math. Phys. 73 (1980), 265-271.
35. [28] H. Kastrup: Phys. Lett. 82B (1979), 237-238; H. Kastrup and M. Rinke: Phys. Lett. 105B (1981), 191-196; M. Rinke: Commun. Math. Phys. 73 (1980), 265-271.
36. [29] Y. Nambu: Phys. Lett. 92B (1980), 327-330.
37. [30] R. Beig: Int. J. Theor. Phys. 30 (1991), 211-224.
38. [31] I. Kanatchikov: Europhys. Lett. 12 (1990), 577-581; I. Kanatchikov: On the bivector field created by null strings and its relation to the Weyl spinor field, preprint F-52, Inst. of Physics, Estonian Acad. Sci. (Tartu, 1990), 51 pp. (in Russian): I. Kanatchikov: Towards the causal interpretation of the Weyl spinor field using null string, P. N. Lebedev Physical Institute report (Moscow, March 1991) 16 pp., unpublished.
39. [31] I. Kanatchikov: Europhys. Lett. 12 (1990), 577-581; I. Kanatchikov: On the bivector field created by null strings and its relation to the Weyl spinor field, preprint F-52, Inst. of Physics, Estonian Acad. Sci. (Tartu, 1990), 51 pp. (in Russian): I. Kanatchikov: Towards the causal interpretation of the Weyl spinor field using null string, P. N. Lebedev Physical Institute report (Moscow, March 1991) 16 pp., unpublished.
40. [31] I. Kanatchikov: Europhys. Lett. 12 (1990), 577-581; I. Kanatchikov: On the bivector field created by null strings and its relation to the Weyl spinor field, preprint F-52, Inst. of Physics, Estonian Acad. Sci. (Tartu, 1990), 51 pp. (in Russian): I. Kanatchikov: Towards the causal interpretation of the Weyl spinor field using null string, P. N. Lebedev Physical Institute report (Moscow, March 1991) 16 pp., unpublished.
41. [32] D. R. Grigore: J. Phys. A 25 (1992), 3797-3811.
42. [33] M. Ferraris and M. Francaviglia: The Lagrangian approach to conserved quantities in General Relativity, in Mechanics, Analysis and Geometry: 200 Years after Lagrange, ed. M. Francaviglia, Elsevier, Amsterdam 1991, pp.451-488; see also references cited therein.
43. [34] P. Horava: Class. Quantum Gravity 8 (1991), 2069-2084.
44. [35] G. Esposito, G. Gionti and C. Stornaiolo: Nuovo Cimenta 110B (1995), 1137-1152; gr-qc/9506008.
45. [36] L. A. Dickey, Field-theoretical (multi-time) Lagrange-Hamilton formalism and integrable equations, in Lectures on Integrable Systems, In Memory of Jean-Louis Verdier, eds. O. Babelon, P. Cartier and Y. Kosmann-Schwarzbach, World Scientific, Singapore 1994, pp. 103-162.
46. [37] M. Gotay: A multisymplectic approach to the KdV equation, in Differential Geometric Methods in Theoretical Physics, eds. K. Bleuler and M. Werner, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht 1988.
47. [38] M. Born: Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A143 (1934), 410-437.
48. [39] H. Weyl: Phys. Rev. 46 (1934), 505-508.
49. [40] P. L. García and A. Pérez-Rendón: Commun. Math. Phys. 13 (1969), 24-44; Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 43 (1971), 101-124.
50. [40] P. L. García and A. Pérez-Rendón: Commun. Math. Phys. 13 (1969), 24-44; Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 43 (1971), 101-124.
51. [41] H. Goldschmidt and S. Sternberg: Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 23, fasc. 1 (1973), 203-267; V. Guillemin and S. Sternberg: Math. Surv. 14, AMS, Providence 1977, Ch. 4 §8.
52. [41] H. Goldschmidt and S. Sternberg: Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 23, fasc. 1 (1973), 203-267; V. Guillemin and S. Sternberg: Math. Surv. 14, AMS, Providence 1977, Ch. 4 §8.
53. [42] J. Kijowski: Commun. Math. Phys. 30 (1973), 99-128; J. Kijowski: Bull. Acad. Palon. Sci., Sér sic. math., astr. phys. XXII (1974), 1219-1225; J. Kijowski and W. Szczyrba: Commun. Math. Phys. 46 (1976), 183-206.
54. [42] J. Kijowski: Commun. Math. Phys. 30 (1973), 99-128; J. Kijowski: Bull. Acad. Palon. Sci., Sér sic. math., astr. phys. XXII (1974), 1219-1225; J. Kijowski and W. Szczyrba: Commun. Math. Phys. 46 (1976), 183-206.
55. [42] J. Kijowski: Commun. Math. Phys. 30 (1973), 99-128; J. Kijowski: Bull. Acad. Palon. Sci., Sér sic. math., astr. phys. XXII (1974), 1219-1225; J. Kijowski and W. Szczyrba: Commun. Math. Phys. 46 (1976), 183-206.
56. [43] K. Gawȩdzki: Rep. Math. Phys. 3 (1972), 307-326; K. Gawȩdzki and W. Kondracki: Rep. Math. Phys. 6 (1974), 465-476.
57. [43] K. Gawȩdzki: Rep. Math. Phys. 3 (1972), 307-326; K. Gawȩdzki and W. Kondracki: Rep. Math. Phys. 6 (1974), 465-476.
58. [44] P. Dedecker: Calcul des variations, formes différentielles et champs géodésiques, in Géometrie Differentielle, Colloq. Intern, du CNRS LH, Strasbourg 1953, Publ. du CNRS, Paris 1953, p. 17-34.
59. [45] P. Dedecker: On the generalization of symplectic geometry to multiple integrals in the calculus of variations, in Differential Geometrical Methods in Mathematical Physics, eds. K. Bleuler and A. Reetz, Lect. Notes Math. vol. 570, Springer, Berlin 1977, p. 395-456 (see also his papers cited there).
60. [46] R. Hermann: Lie Algebras and Quantum Mechanics, W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York 1970.
61. [47] C. Günther: J. Diff. Geom. 25 (1987), 23-53.
62. [48] C. Günther: Polysymplectic quantum field theory, in Differential Geometric Methods in Theoretical Physics, Proc. XV Int. Conf., eds. H.D. Doebner and J. D. Hennig, World Scientific, Singapore 1987, p. 14-27.
63. [49] J. E. Carin̂ena, M. Crampin and L. A. Ibort: Diff. Geom. Appl. 1 (1991), 345-374.
64. [50] R. H. Good, Jr.: Phys. Rev. 93 (1954), 239-243.
65. [51] D. G. B. Edelen: Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 5 (1961), 95-176.
66. [52] J. E. Marsden, R. Montgomery, P.J. Morrison and W. P. Thompson: Ann. Phys. 169 (1986), 29-47.
67. [53] a) V. I. Arnold: Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, Springer, New York 1978;
68. b) G. Marino. E. J. Saletan, A. Simoni, B. Vitale: Dynamical Systems, A Differential Geometric Approach to Symmetry and Reduction, Wiley, New York 1985;
69. c) P. Libermann and Ch. Marle: Symplectic Geometry and Analytical Mechanics, Reidel. Dordrecht 1987.
70. [54] W. M. Tulczyjew: Bull. Acad. Polon. sci., Sér sci. math., astr. phys. XXII (1974), 937-942.
71. [55] J. A. Schouten: Über Differentiatkomitanten zweier kontravarianter Grossen, Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. (Amsterdam) 43 (1940), 449-452; J. A. Scheuten: On the differential operators of first order in tensor calculus, in Convegno di Geometria Differenziale 1953, Ed. Cremonese, Roma 1954, p. 1-7; A, Nijenhuis: Proc. Kon. Ned. Ak. Wet, (Amsterdam) A58 (1955) 390-403.
72. [55] J. A. Schouten: Über Differentiatkomitanten zweier kontravarianter Grossen, Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. (Amsterdam) 43 (1940), 449-452; J. A. Scheuten: On the differential operators of first order in tensor calculus, in Convegno di Geometria Differenziale 1953, Ed. Cremonese, Roma 1954, p. 1-7; A, Nijenhuis: Proc. Kon. Ned. Ak. Wet, (Amsterdam) A58 (1955) 390-403.
73. [55] J. A. Schouten: Über Differentiatkomitanten zweier kontravarianter Grossen, Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. (Amsterdam) 43 (1940), 449-452; J. A. Scheuten: On the differential operators of first order in tensor calculus, in Convegno di Geometria Differenziale 1953, Ed. Cremonese, Roma 1954, p. 1-7; A, Nijenhuis: Proc. Kon. Ned. Ak. Wet, (Amsterdam) A58 (1955) 390-403.
74. [56] P. Dolan: A generalization of the Lie derivative, in Classical General Relativity, eds. W. B. Bonnor, J. N. Islam and M. A. H. MacCallum, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1983. p. 53-62.
75. [57] M. Gerstenhaber: Ann. Math. 78 (1963), 267-288; M. Gerstenhaber and S. D. Schack: Algebraic cohomology and deformation theory, in Deformation Theory of Algebras and Structures and Applications, eds. M. Hazewinkel and M. Gerstenhaber, KJuwer, Dordrecht 1988, p. 11-264.
76. [57] M. Gerstenhaber: Ann. Math. 78 (1963), 267-288; M. Gerstenhaber and S. D. Schack: Algebraic cohomology and deformation theory, in Deformation Theory of Algebras and Structures and Applications, eds. M. Hazewinkel and M. Gerstenhaber, KJuwer, Dordrecht 1988, p. 11-264.
77. [58] J.-L. Koszul: Astérisque, hors série, 1985, 257-271.
78. [59] M. Flato, M. Gerstenhaber and A. A. Voronov: Lett. Math. Phys. 34 (1995), 77-90.
79. [60] A. Frölicher and A. Nijenhuis: Proc. Kon. Ned. Ak. Wet. (Amsterdam) A59 (1956) 338-359; P. W. Michor: Note on the Frölicher-Nijenhuis bracket, in Differential Geometry and its Applications, Proc. Conf. Brno 1986, ed. D. Krupka, J. E. Purkyne Univ., Brno 1988, p. 197.
80. [60] A. Frölicher and A. Nijenhuis: Proc. Kon. Ned. Ak. Wet. (Amsterdam) A59 (1956) 338-359; P. W. Michor: Note on the Frölicher-Nijenhuis bracket, in Differential Geometry and its Applications, Proc. Conf. Brno 1986, ed. D. Krupka, J. E. Purkyne Univ., Brno 1988, p. 197.
81. [61] F. Mimura, T. Sakurai and T. Nôno: Tensor, N.S. 51 (1992), 193-204.
82. [62] I. Kolař, P. W. Michor and J. Slovák: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer, Berlin 1993.
83. [63] A. M. Vinogradov: Unification of Schouten-Nijenhuis and Frölicher-Nijenhuis brackets, cohomology and super-differential operators, Matem. Zametki (Math. Notices) 47 (1990) 138-140; A. Cabras and A. M. Vinogradov: J. Geom. Phys. 9 (1992), 75-100.
84. [63] A. M. Vinogradov: Unification of Schouten-Nijenhuis and Frölicher-Nijenhuis brackets, cohomology and super-differential operators, Matem. Zametki (Math. Notices) 47 (1990) 138-140; A. Cabras and A. M. Vinogradov: J. Geom. Phys. 9 (1992), 75-100.
85. [64] C. Roger: Algebras de Lie graduées et quantification, in Symplectic Geometry and Mathematical Physics, eds. P. Donato, C. Duval, et al., Birkhäuser, Boston 1991, p. 374-421.
86. [65] A. Echeverría-Enríquez and M. C. Muñoz-Lecanda: Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré 56 (1992), 27-47.
87. [66] A. Echeverría-Enríquez, M. C. Muñoz-Lecanda and N. Román-Roy: Fortschr. Phys. 44 (1996), 235-280.
88. [67] M. de Léon, J. Marín-Solano and J. C. Marrero: A geometrical approach to classical field theories: a constraint algorithm for singular theories, preprint, Madrid 1994.
89. [68] D. Saunders: The Geometry of Jet Bundles, Cambridge University Press. Cambridge 1989.
90. [69] Y. Kosmann-Schwarzbach and F. Magri: Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré, Phys. Theor. 53 (1990), 35-81.
91. [70] M. V. Karasev and V. P. Maslov: Nonlinear Poisson Brackets, Geometry and Quantization, Nauka, Moscow 1991 (in Russian); English translation: AMS Providence, Rhode Island, 1993.
92. [71] P. Michor: J. Geom. Phys. 2 (1985), pp. 67-82; M. Dubois-Violette and P. Michor: A common generalization of the Frölicher-Nijenhuis bracket and the Schonten bracket for symmetric multi vector fields, preprint ESI 70 (1994), L.P.T.H.E.-Orsay 94/05, alg-geom/9401006.
93. [71] P. Michor: J. Geom. Phys. 2 (1985), pp. 67-82; M. Dubois-Violette and P. Michor: A common generalization of the Frölicher-Nijenhuis bracket and the Schonten bracket for symmetric multi vector fields, preprint ESI 70 (1994), L.P.T.H.E.-Orsay 94/05, alg-geom/9401006.
94. [72] L. A. Ibort and J. Monterde: J. Geom. Phys. 12 (1993) 29-34.
95. [73] I. V. Kanatchikov: From the Poincaré-Cartan form to the finite dimensional covariant canonical structure in field theory, preprint PITHA 94/20 (April 1994); I. V. Kanatchikov: Basic structures of the covariant canonical formalism for fields based on the De Donder-Weyl theory, preprint PITHA 94/47 (Oct. 1994), hep-th/9410238; I. V. Kanatchikov: On the finite dimensional covariant Hamiltonian formalism in field theory, invited contribution to New Frontiers in Gravitation, ed. by G. Sardanashvily, Hadronic Press, Palm Harbor 1995, unpublished due to a technical fault; (in these papers the left Leibniz rule for the Poisson bracket should be rather replaced by the right Leibniz rule; cf. Section 3.1 here)
96. [73] I. V. Kanatchikov: From the Poincaré-Cartan form to the finite dimensional covariant canonical structure in field theory, preprint PITHA 94/20 (April 1994); I. V. Kanatchikov: Basic structures of the covariant canonical formalism for fields based on the De Donder-Weyl theory, preprint PITHA 94/47 (Oct. 1994), hep-th/9410238; I. V. Kanatchikov: On the finite dimensional covariant Hamiltonian formalism in field theory, invited contribution to New Frontiers in Gravitation, ed. by G. Sardanashvily, Hadronic Press, Palm Harbor 1995, unpublished due to a technical fault; (in these papers the left Leibniz rule for the Poisson bracket should be rather replaced by the right Leibniz rule; cf. Section 3.1 here)
97. [73] I. V. Kanatchikov: From the Poincaré-Cartan form to the finite dimensional covariant canonical structure in field theory, preprint PITHA 94/20 (April 1994); I. V. Kanatchikov: Basic structures of the covariant canonical formalism for fields based on the De Donder-Weyl theory, preprint PITHA 94/47 (Oct. 1994), hep-th/9410238; I. V. Kanatchikov: On the finite dimensional covariant Hamiltonian formalism in field theory, invited contribution to New Frontiers in Gravitation, ed. by G. Sardanashvily, Hadronic Press, Palm Harbor 1995, unpublished due to a technical fault; (in these papers the left Leibniz rule for the Poisson bracket should be rather replaced by the right Leibniz rule; cf. Section 3.1 here)
98. [74] I. V. Kanatchikov: Novel algebraic structures in field theory from the polysympkctic form, in GROUP21, Physical Applications and Mathematical Aspects of Geometry, Groups, and Algebras, vol. 2, eds. H.-D. Doebner et al., World Scientific, Singapore 1997, p. 894-899; hep-th/9612225.
99. [75] I. V. Kanatchikov: Rep. Math. Phys. 40 (1997), 225.
100. [76] M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim: Quantization of Gauge Systems, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1992); E. Witten: Mod. Phys. Lett. A5 (1990), 487-494.
101. [76] M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim: Quantization of Gauge Systems, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1992); E. Witten: Mod. Phys. Lett. A5 (1990), 487-494.
102. [77] G. Barnich and M. Henneaux: Isomorphism between the Batalin-Vilkoviaky antibracket and the Poisson bracket, preprint CGPG-96/1-7, hep-th/9601124.
103. [78] B. H. Lian and G. J. Zuckerman: Commun. Math. Phys. 154 (1993), 613-646; M. Penkava and A. Schwarz: On some algebraic structures arising in string theory, in: Perspectives in Mathematical Physics, eds. R. Penner and S.-T. Yau, Internat, Press Inc., Boston 1994, p. 219-228; hep-th/9212072.
104. [78] B. H. Lian and G. J. Zuckerman: Commun. Math. Phys. 154 (1993), 613-646; M. Penkava and A. Schwarz: On some algebraic structures arising in string theory, in: Perspectives in Mathematical Physics, eds. R. Penner and S.-T. Yau, Internat, Press Inc., Boston 1994, p. 219-228; hep-th/9212072.
105. [79] G. G. Emch: Mathematical and Conceptual Foundations of 20th-century Physics, (North-Holland, Amsterdam 1984.
106. [80] I. V. Kanatchikov: On the Canonical structure of the De Donder-Weyl covariant Hamiltonian formulation of field theory I. Graded Poisson brackets and the equations of motion, Aachen preprint, PITHA 93/41 (Nov. 1993), 30pp, hep-th/9312162.