Usefulness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Dynamic Contrast Enhancement and Fat Suppression in Detecting a Pancreatic Tumor

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 107-111

  Murakami, Koji ^a   Nawano, Shigeru ^a   Moriyama, Noriyuki ^a   Onuma, Yutaka ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER CENTER HOSPITAL EAST   (Japan)

Author keywords

Adenocarcinoma; Fat suppression; Islet cell tumor; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pancreas

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ARTICLE; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PANCREAS ISLET CELL CARCINOMA; PANCREAS TUMOR; PATHOLOGY;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, ISLET CELL; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 0031992155     PISSN: 03682811     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jjco/28.2.107     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Stark DD, Moss AA, Goldberg HI, Davis PL, Federle MP. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas. Radiology 1984;150 153-62.
2. Tscholakoff D, Hricak H, Thoeni R, Winkler ML, Margulis AR. MR imaging in the diagnosis of pancreatic disease. AJR 1987;148:703-9
3. Steiner E, Stark DD, Hahn PF, Saini S, Simeon JF, Mueller PR, et al. Imaging of pancreatic neoplasms: Comparison of MR and CT. Am J Roentgen 152:487-491, 1989.
4. Unger EC, Cohen MS, Gatenby RA, Clair MR, Brown TR, Nelson SJ, et al. Single breath-holding scans of the abdomen using FISP and FLASH at 1.5T. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1988;12:575-83.
5. Semelka RC, Simm FC, Recht MP, Deimling M, Lenz G, Laub GA. MR imaging of the pancreas at high field strength: comparison of six sequences. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;15:966-71.
6. Freeny PC, Marks WM. Ryan JA, Traverso LW. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: diagnosis and staging with dynamic CT. Radiology 1988,166:125-33.
7. Chezmar JL, Nelson RC, Small WC, Bernardmo ME. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas with gadolinium-DTPA. Gastrointest Radiol 1991;16:139-42.
8. Michell DG, Vidnitski S, Saponaro S, Tasciyan T, Burk DL, Rifkin MD, Liver and pancreas: improved spin-echo T1 contrast by shorter echo time and fat suppression at 1.5 T. Radiology 1991;178:67-71.
9. Megibow AJ, Zhou XH, Rotterdam H, Francis IR, Zerhouni EA, Balfe DM, et al Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: CT versus MR imaging in the evaluation of resectability - Report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology 1995;195:327-32.
10. Semelka RC, Kroeker MA, Shoenut JP, Kroeker R, Yaffe CS, Micflikier AB. Pancreatic disease: prospective comparison of CT, ERCP and 1.5 T MR imaging with dynamic gadolinium enhancement and fat suppression. Radiology 1991;181:785-91.
11. Gabata T, Matsui O, Kadoya M, Yoshikawa J, Nhyayama S, Takashima T, et al. Small pancreatic adenocarcinoma: efficacy of MR imaging with fat suppression and gadolinium enhancement Radiology 1994;193:683-8.
12. Semelka RC, Ascher SM MR imaging of the pancreas. Radiology 1993,188.593-602.
13. Morimoto K, Shimoi M, Shirakawa T, Aoki Y, Choi S, Miyata Y, et al. Biliary obstruction: evaluation with three-dimensional MR cholangiography. Radiology 1992;183:578-80.
14. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, Clarke P, Siegenberg D, Chuttani R, et al. Pancreatic duct MR cholangiopancreatography with a three-dimensional fast spin-echo technique. Radiology 1995;196:459-64.
15. Semelka RC, Cumming MJ, Shoenut JP, Magro CM, Yaffe CS, Kroeker MA, et al Islet cell tumors: comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging with dynamic gadolinium enhancement and fat suppression. Radiology 1993;186:799-802.