The recovery of identity and relative position from visual input: Further evidence for the independence of processing of what and where

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 303-318

  Quinlan, Philip T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0031991628     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206039     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. ANSTIS, S. M. (1974). A chart illustrating variations in acuity with retinal position. Vision Research, 14, 589-592.
2. ATKINSON, J., & BRADDICK, O. J. (1989). "Where" and "what" in visual search. Perception, 18, 181-189.
3. BUNDESEN, C. (1991). Visual selection of features and objects: Is location special? A reinterpretation of Nissen's (1985) findings. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 87-89.
4. BUNDESEN, C. (1993). The notion of elements in the visual field in a theory of visual attention: A reply to van der Velde and van der Heijden (1993). Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 350-352.
5. CAVE, K. R., & PASHLER, H. (1995). Visual selection mediated by location: Selecting successive visual objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 421-432.
6. CLARK, H. H., & CHASE, W. G. (1972). On the process of comparing sentences against pictures. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 472-517.
7. EGETH, H. E., & MORDKOFF, J. T. (1991). Redundancy gain revisited: Evidence for parallel processing of separable dimensions. In G. Lockhead & J. Pomerantz (Eds.), The perception of structure: Essays in honor of Wendell R. Garner (pp. 131-143). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8. ERIKSEN, C. W. (1988). A source of error in attempts to distinguish coactivation from separate activation in the perception of redundant targets. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 191-193.
9. ERIKSEN, C. W., GOETTL, B., ST. JAMES, J. D., & FOURNIER, L. R. (1989). Processing redundant signals: Coactivation. divided attention, or what? Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 356-370.
10. FARELL, B. (1985). "Same"-"different" judgments: A review of current controversies in perceptual comparisons. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 419-456.
11. HEATHCOTE, A., & MEWHORT, D. J. K. (1993). Representation and selection of relative position. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 488-516.
12. HINTON, G. E. (1981). A parallel computation that assigns canonical object-based frames of reference. Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2, 683-685.
13. HINTON, G. E., & PARSONS, L. M. (1988). Scene-based and viewer-centered representations for comparing shapes. Cognition, 30, 1-35.
14. HOWARD, I. P. (1986). The perception of posture, self motion and the visual vertical. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 18.1-18.62). New York: Wiley.
15. JOHNSTON, J. C., & PASHLER, H. (1990). Close binding of identity and location in visual feature perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 843-856.
16. LINDSAY, P.H., & NORMAN, D. A. (1972). Human information processing: An introduction to psychology. New York: Academic Press.
17. LOGAN, G. D. (1995). Linguistic and conceptual control of visual spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 28, 103-174.
18. LOGAN, G. D., & COMPTON, B. J. (1996). Distance and distraction effects in the apprehension of spatial relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 159-172.
19. LU, C.-H., & PROCTOR, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174-207.
20. MILLER, J. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 247-279.
21. MILLER, J. (1988). Components of the location probability effect in visual search tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 453-471.
22. MONHEIT, M. A., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1994). Spatial attention to arrays of multidimensional objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 691-708.
23. MORDKOFF, J. T., & YANTIS, S. (1991). An interactive race model of divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 520-538.
24. MORDKOFF, J. T., YANTIS, S., & EGETH, H. E. (1990). Detecting conjunctions of color and form in parallel. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 157-168.
25. NISSEN, M. J. (1985). Accessing features and objects: Is location special? In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 205-219). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. QUINLAN, P. T. (1995). Evidence for the use of scene-based frames of reference in two-dimensional shape recognition. Spatial Vision, 9, 101-125.
27. RATCLIFF, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446-461.
28. ROBERTSON, L. C. (1995). Covert orienting in scene-based reference frames: Orientation priming and visual field differences. Journal of Experimental Psyhology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 707-718.
29. SAGI, D., & JULESZ, B. (1985). "Where" and "what" in vision. Science, 228, 1217-1219.
30. SHAW, M. L., & SHAW, P. (1977). Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 201-211.
31. TREISMAN, A. (1988). Features and objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-234.
32. TREISMAN, A., & GELADE, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
33. TREISMAN, A., VIEIRA, A., & HAYES, A. (1992). Automaticity and preattentive processing. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 341-362.
34. TSAL, N., & LAVIE, Y. (1993). Location dominance in attending to color and shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 131-139.
35. ULLMAN, S. (1979). The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. VAN DER VELDE, F., & VAN DER HEIJDEN, A. H. C. (1993). An element in the visual field is just a conjunction of attributes: A critique of Bundesen (1991). Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 345-349.
37. WINER, B. J. (1962). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
38. WOLFE, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review; 1, 202-238.