Sex differences in intelligence: Data from a Scottish standardisation of the WAIS-R

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 289-290

  Lynn, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031991460     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00165-7     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Ankney, C. D. (1992). Sex differences in relative brain size: the mismeasure of women, too? Intelligence,. 16, 329-336.
2. Brody, N. (1992). Intelligence. San Diego: Academic Press.
3. Crawford, J. R., Gray, C. D. & Allan, K. M. (1995). The WAIS-R (UK): basic psychometric properties in an adult UK sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 34, 237-250.
4. Halpern, D. E. (1992). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Jensen, A. R. (1994). Psychometric g related to differences in head size. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 597-606.
6. Kaufman, A. S., McLean, J. E. & Reynolds, C. R. (1988). Sex, race, region and education differences on the 11 WAIS-R subtests. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 231-248.
7. Lynn, R. (1990). The role of nutrition in secular increases of intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 273-286.
8. Lynn, R. (1994). Sex differences in brain size and intelligence: a paradox resolved. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 257-272.
9. Lynn, R. (1996). Differences between males and females in mean IQ and university examination performance in Ireland. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 649-652.
10. Lynn, R. & Dai, X.-Y (1993). Sex differences on the Chinese standardisation sample of the WAIS-R. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 154, 459-463.
11. Mackintosh, N. J. (1996). Sex differences and IQ. Journal of Biosocial Science, 28, 559-572.
12. Reynolds, C. R., Chastain, R. L., Kaufman, A. S. & McLean, J. E. (1987). Demographic characteristics and IQ among adults: analysis of the WAIS-R standardisation sample as a function of stratification variables. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 323--342.
13. Rushton, J. P. (1992). Cranial capacity related to sex, rank and race in a stratified sample of 6325 U.S. military personnel. Intelligence, 16, 401-414.