Cutting pattern of nickel-titanium files using two preparation techniques

Endodontics and Dental Traumatology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 10-15

  Elliott, L M ^a   Curtis, R V ^a   Pitt Ford, T R ^a  

^a GUY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Nickel titanium files; Root canal instrumentation; Root canal shape

Indexed keywords

NICKEL; STAINLESS STEEL; TITANIUM; TITANIUM NICKELIDE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; ENDODONTICS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; TOOTH PULP;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; MODELS, STRUCTURAL; NICKEL; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; STAINLESS STEEL; TITANIUM;

EID: 0031991385     PISSN: 01092502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1998.tb00802.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Roane JB, Sabala CL, Duncanson MG. The "balanced force" concept for instrumentation of curved canals. J Ended 1985; 11:203-11.
2. Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Efficacy of three techniques in cleaning the apical portion of curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;79:492-6.
3. Calhoun G, Montgomery S. The effects of four instrumentation techniques on root canal shape. J Endod 1988;14:273-7.
4. Sepic AO, Pantera EA, Neaverth EJ, Anderson RW. A comparison of Flex-R files and K-type files for enlargement of severely curved molar root canals. J Endod 1989; 15:240-5.
5. Leseberg DA, Montgomery S. The effects of Canal Master, Flex-R, and K-Flex instrumentation on root canal configuration. J Endod 1991;! 7:59-65.
6. Krupp JD, Brantley WA, Gcrstein H. An investigation of the torsional and bending properties of seven brands of endodontic files. J Endod 1984; 10:372-80.
7. Randall JM, Goodreau WF. Effect of NaOCl on separation resistance of 0.04 rotary NiTi files [abstract]. J Endod 1995;21:240.
8. Camps JJ, Pertot \VJ. Torsional and stiffness properties of nickel-titanium K files. Int Endod J 1995;28:239-43.
9. Serene TP, Adams JD, Saxena A. Nickel-titanium instruments: applications in endodontics. St. Louis. MO: Ishiyaku EuroAmerica; 1995.
10. Lim K.C, Webber J. The validity of simulated root canals for the investigation of the prepared root canal shape. Int Endod J 1985; 18:240-6.
11. Coleman CL, Svec TA, Riegcr MR, Wang M, Suchina JA, Glickman GN. Stainless steel vs. nickel-titanium K-files: analysis of instrumentation in curved canals [abstract], J Endod 1995;21:221.
12. Alodeh MHA, Doller R, Dummer PMH. Shaping of simulated canals in resin blocks using the step-back technique with K-files manipulated in a simple in/out filing motion. Int Endod J 1989;22:107-17.
13. Briseno BM, Sonnabend E. The influence of different root canal instruments on root canal preparation: an in dtro study. Int Endod J 1991;24:15-23.
14. Dummer PMH, Alodeh MHA, Al-Omari MAO. A method for the construction of simulated canals in clear resin blocks. Int EndodJ 1991;24:63-6.
15. Bedford-Roberts E, Curtis RV, Pitt Ford TR. Cutting pattern of Flexogate instruments in plastic blocks. Endod Dent Traumatol 1997; 13:228-33.
16. TepelJ, Schäfer E, Hoppe W. Root canal instruments for manual use: cutting efficiency and instrumentation of curved canals. Int EndodJ I995;28:68-7G.
17. Bou Dagher FE, Yared GM. Comparison of three files to prepare curved root canals. J Endod 1995; 13:264-5.
18. Esposito PT, Cunningham CJ. A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments. J Endod 1995;21:173-6.
19. Royal JR, DonnellyJC. A comparison of maintenance of canal curvature using balanced-force instrumentation \vith three different file types. J Endod 1995;21:300-4.
20. Stone R, Zuolo M, Walton R. Apical transportation: steel vs NiTi hand vs NiTi rotary [abstract]. J Endod 1995;21:216.
21. Sabala CL, Roane JB, Southard LZ. Instrumentation of curved canals using a modified tipped instrument: a comparison study. J Endod 1988; 14:59-64.
22. Powell SE, Wong PD, Simon JHS. A comparison of the effect of modified and nonmodified instrument tips on apical canal configuration. Part II. J Endod 1988;14:224-8.
23. Baumgartner JC, Martin H, Sabala CL, Strittmatter FJ, \Vildey WL, Quigley NC. Histomorphometric comparison of canals prepared by four techniques. J Endod 1992; 18:530-4.
24. Diandreth M, Ellis RA, Fagundes D. The effectiveness of hand and rotary files to maintain canal curvature: a comparison [abstract]. J Endod 1995;21:236.
25. Alimad M, Pitt Ford TR. Comparison of two ultrasonic units in shaping simulated curved canals. J Endod 1989; 15:457-62.
26. Southard D\V, Oswald RJ, Natkin E. Instrumentation of curved molar root canals \vith the Roane technique. J Endod 1987; 13:479-89.
27. Ram Z. Effectiveness of root canal irrigation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1977;44:306-12.
28. Glossen CR, Hallcr RH, Dove SB, Del Rio CE. A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, NiTi enginedriven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments. J Endod 1995;21:146-51.
29. Eldeeb ME, BoraasJC. The effect of different files on the preparation shape of severely curved canals. Int Endod J 1985;18:l-7.
30. Cimis GM, Boyer TJ, Pelleu GB. Effect of three file types on the apical preparations of moderately curved canals. J Endod 1988;14:441-4.