Comparison of the new matrix system with traditional fixed prosthodontic impression procedures

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 79, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 200-207

  Livaditis, Gus J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND DENTAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; ETHER DERIVATIVE; RUBBER;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; GINGIVA; GINGIVA BLEEDING; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LAVAGE; PHYSIOLOGY; VISCOSITY;

DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; DENTURE, PARTIAL, TEMPORARY; ETHERS; GINGIVA; GINGIVAL HEMORRHAGE; HEMOSTATIC TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; IRRIGATION; MATRIX BANDS; RUBBER; TOOTH PREPARATION, PROSTHODONTIC; VISCOSITY;

EID: 0031990430     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70216-1     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Dubin C. Copper band and tray technique for anterior jacket and crown impressions. J Can Dent Assoc 37 (1971) 387
2. Goldfogel M.H., Bomberg T.J., and Bomberg S.E. Tube impressions: an alternative technique for taking difficult crown and bridge impressions with minimal gingival trauma. Quintessence Int 20 (1989) 555-560
3. LaForgia A. Cordless tissue retraction for impressions for fixed prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 17 (1967) 379-386
4. Dimashkieh M.R., and Morgano S.M. A procedure for making fixed prosthodontic impressions with the use of preformed crown shells. J Prosthet Dent 73 (1995) 95-96
5. Cannistraci A.J. A new approach to impression taking for crown and bridge. Dent Clin North Am 9 2 (1965) 33-42
6. LaForgia A. Multiple abutment impressions using vacuum adapted temporary splints. J Prosthet Dent 23 (1970) 44-50
7. Lococo M.P. The hydrodynamic impression technique. J Can Dent Assoc 52 (1986) 1001-1003
8. Livaditis G.J. The matrix impression system for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent (1997) [in press]
9. Livaditis G.J. Crown foundations using a custom matrix, composite resin and reverse carving. J Prosthet Dent 77 (1997) 540-545
10. Eames W.B., Sieweke J.C., Wallace S.W., and Rogers L.B. Elastomeric impression materials: effect of bulk on accuracy. J Prosthet Dent 41 (1979) 304
11. Christensen G.J. Now is the time to change to custom impression trays. J Am Dent Assoc 125 (1994) 619-620
12. Kao E.C. Chairside custom tray impression tray. J Clin Orthod 23 (1989) 434-435
13. Bomberg T.J., Hatch R.A., and Hoffman Jr. W. Impression material thickness in stock and custom trays. J Prosthet Dent 54 (1985) 170-172
14. Marshak B.L., Cardash H.S., and Ben-Ur Z. Incidence of impression material found in the gingival sulcus after impression procedures for fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 57 (1987) 306-308