Location of Incisive Canal in Relation to Central Incisor Implants

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 221-225

  Kraut, Richard A ^a   Boyden, Derek K ^a  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Axial CT images; Computerized tomograms; Incisive foramen canal; Maxillary central incisors

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INCISOR; MALE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ADULT; AGED; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCISOR; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MALE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0031986841     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008505-199807030-00010     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Lekholm U, Herrmann I, Fomer T, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous jaws: A prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9:627-635.
2. Higginbottom FL, Wilson TG Jr. Three-dimensional templates for placement of root-form dental implants: A technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:787-793.
3. Haas R, Mensdorff-Pouilly N, Mailath G, et al. Survival of 1920 IMZ implants followed for up to 100 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:581-588.
4. Iordanishvili AK. Age-related characteristics and sex differences in the anatomical structure of the incisive canal. Stomatologiia. 1991;4:25-27.
5. Scher ELC. Use of the incisive canal as a recipient site for root-form implants: Preliminary clinical reports. Implant Dent. 1994;3:38-41.
6. McGivney GP, Haughton V, Strandt JA, et al. A comparison of computer-assisted tomography and data-gathering modalities in prosthodontics. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986;1:55-68.
7. Schwartz MS, Rothman SLG, Rhodes ML, et al. Computed tomography: Part II. Preoperative assessment of the maxilla for endosseous implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1987;2:143-148.
8. Rothman SLG, Chafetz N, Rhodes ML, et al. CT in the preoperative assessment of the mandible and maxilla for endosseous implant surgery: Work in progress, Head Neck Radiol. 1988;168: 171-175.
9. Lima Verde MAR, Morgano SM. A dual-purpose stent for the implantsupported prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:276-280.
10. Weinberg LA. CT scan as a radiologic data base for optimum implant orientation. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69:381-385.
11. Sethi A. Precise site location for implants using CT scans: A technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:433-438.
12. Kraut RA. Interactive radiologic diagnosis and case planning for implants (interview). Dent Implantol Update. 1994;5:49-55.
13. Lam EWN, Ruprecht A, Yang J. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;74:42-46.
14. Verstreken K, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Marchai G, et al. Computer-assisted planning of oral implant surgery: A threedimensional approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:806-810.