Reliability of the Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile (KAPP) among patients with and without psychoactive substance abuse disorders

Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 10-16

  Weinryb, Robert M ^a,c   Busch, Monica ^b   Gustavsson, J Petter ^a   Saxon, Lars ^b   Skarbrandt, Eva ^b  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b St Goran Clin of Dependence Disord   (Sweden)

^c St Goran Clin of Dependence Disord ^*  (Sweden)

Author keywords

Abuse; Personality assessment; Psychodiagnostic instrument; Psychodynamic profile; Rating scale; Reliability

Indexed keywords

PSYCHOTROPIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; OUTPATIENT; PERSONALITY TEST; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; TRAINING;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 0031984656     PISSN: 00333190     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000012253     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Weinryb RM, Rössel RJ: Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile - KAPP. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1991;83(suppl 363):1-23.
2. Weinryb RM, Rössel RJ: Perfil Psicodinámica de Karolinska - KAPP. Madrid, Aran, 1993.
3. Weinryb RM, Rössel RJ: Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile. Psichiatr Psicoter Anal 1993; 12:85-114.
4. Weinryb RM, Rössel RJ: Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile - KAPP. Roskilde, IPTP's Forlag, 1994.
5. Weinryb RM, Rössel RJ, Åsberg M: The Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile. II. Interdisciplinary and cross-cultural reliability. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1991;83:73-76.
6. Siani R, Siciliani O: Valutazione della psicoterapia mediante il 'Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile (KAPP)': Outcome a 2 anni su 60 pazienti psichiatrici. Quad Ital Psichiatr 1995;14: 293-374.
7. Turrina C, Siani R, Regini C, Campana A, Bologna R, Siciliani O: Inter-observer and test-retest reliability of the Italian version of the Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile in two groups of psychiatric patients. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1996;93:282-287.
8. Charitat H: Evaluation de la personnalité. Traduction et validation du KAPP: Profil Psychodynamique de Karolinska (Doctorat d'état): Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse III, 1996.
9. Weinryb RM, Gustavsson JP, Åsberg M, Rössel RJ: Stability over time of character assessment using a psychodynamic instrument and personality inventories. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1992;86:179-184.
10. Weinryb RM, Gustavsson JP, Åsberg M, Rössel RJ: The concept of alexithymia: An empirical study using psychodynamic ratings and self reports. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1992;85:153-162.
11. Weinryb RM, Gustavsson JP, Liljeqvist L, Poppen B, Rössel RJ: A prospective study of personality as predictor of quality of life after pelvic pouch operation. Am J Surg 1997;173: 83-87.
12. Weinryb RM, Gustavsson JP, Barber JP: Personality predictors of dimensions of psychosocial adjustment after surgery. Psychosom Med, in press.
13. Weinryb RM, Rössel RJ, Åsberg M: The Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile. I. Validity and dimensionality. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1991;83: 64-72.
14. Weinryb RM, Gustavsson JP, Åsberg M, Rössel RJ: Relationship between components of alexithymia as measured with psychodynamic ratings and subjective lack of well-being. Psychother Psychosom 1994;61:100-108.
15. Haver B, Svanborg P, Lindberg S: Improving the usefulness of the Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile in research: Proposals from a reliability study. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1995; 92:132-137.
16. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, ed 3 - Revised. Washington, D.C., American Psychiatric Association, 1987.
17. Kernberg OF: Severe Personality Disorders. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1984.
18. Shrout PE, Fleiss FL: Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420-428.
19. Siegel S, Castellan NJ Jr: Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, ed 2. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1988.
20. Thompson C (ed): The Instruments of Psychiatric Research. Chichester, Wiley, 1989.
21. Ehlers W, Hettinger R, Paar G: Operational diagnostic approaches in the assessment of defense mechanisms. Psychother Psychosom 1995;63:124-135.
22. Lambert MJ, Hill CE: Assessing psychotherapy outcomes and processes; in Bergin AE, Garfield SL (eds): Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change. New York, Wiley, 1994, pp 72-113.