Reactions of residency directors to primary care requirements in obstetrics and gynecology training

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 91, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 145-148

  Kuffel, Mary E ^a   Stovall, Dale W ^a   Kuffel, Thomas S ^a   Zlatnik, Frank J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION PROGRAM; GYNECOLOGY; HEALTH PROGRAM; OBSTETRICS; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENCY EDUCATION;

EID: 0031983051     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00600-5     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. 1. Pearson JW. The obstetrician and gynecologist: Primary physician for women. JAMA 1975;231:815-6.
2. 2. Dunn LJ. The obstetrician-gynecologist - Generalist, specialist, sub-specialist? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:1188-90.
3. 3. Dunn LJ. Not to decide is to decide. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;168: 1053-62.
4. 4. Russell KP. Report of the Task Force on Scope and Function of the Obstetrician-Gynecologist, 1980. Washington, DC: ACOG, 1980.
5. 5. National Resident Matching Program. NRMP data: March 1996. Washington, DC: NRMP, 1996.
6. 6. Merrill JA. Needed changes in obstetric-gynecologic training. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1994;49:1-2.