Estimating total Barthel scores from just three items: The European Stroke Database 'minimum dataset' for assessing functional status at discharge from hospital

Age and Ageing

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 115-122

  Ellul, John ^a   Watkins, Caroline ^b   Barer, David ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AINTREE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Functional assessment; Hospital discharge; Minimum dataset; Standardized measure; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DATA BASE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NOMENCLATURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; STROKE; URINE INCONTINENCE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COGNITION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DISABILITY EVALUATION; EUROPE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; PATIENT DISCHARGE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REGISTRIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 0031980553     PISSN: 00020729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/27.2.115     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Barer D, ElluI J. From meta-analysis to epi-analysis. The European Stroke Database Project. In: Fracchia GN, Haavisto KH eds. European Medicines Research. Perspectives in clinical trials. Cambridge: European Conference Publications, 1996; 157-64.
2. Feinstein AR, Josephy BR, Wells CK. Scientific and clinical problems in indexes of functional disability. Ann Internal Med 1986; 105: 413-20.
3. Barer D. Assessment in rehabilitation. Rev Clin Gerontol 1993; 3: 169-86.
4. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel ADL index. Md State Med J 1965; 14: 61-5.
5. Granger CV, Greer DS. Functional status measurement and medical rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1976; 57: 103-9.
6. Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Home V. The Barthel ADL index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Studies 1988; 10: 61-3.
7. Granger CV, Dewis LS, Peters NC, Sherwood CC, Barrett JE. Stroke rehabilitation: analysis of repeated Barthel index measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1979; 60: 14-7.
8. Wade DT, Langton Hewer R. Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50: 177-82.
9. Hanley J, McAndrew L. A survey of the younger chronic sick and disabled living in the community of Lothian Region. Int Disabil Studies 1987; 9: 74-7.
10. Gresham GE, Phillips TF, Labi MLC. ADL status in stroke: relative merits of three standard indexes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1980; 61: 355-8.
11. Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel index: a standard measure of physical disability. Int Disabil Studies 1988; 10: 64-7.
12. Royal College of Physicians of London and British Geriatrics Society Joint Working Group. Standardised Assessment Scales for Elderly People. London: Royal College of Physicians, 1992.
13. Stone SP, Ali B, Auberleek I, Thompseil A, Young A. The Barthel index in clinical practice: use on a rehabilitation ward for elderly people. J Roy Coll Phys 1994; 28: 419-23.
14. Geddes JML, Chamberlain MA. Outcome of stroke rehabilitation-observing current practice: a prerequisite for targets and standards. Clin Rehabil 1992; 6: 253-60.
15. Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation Report of First Admissions for 1990. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 71: 108-13.
16. TRUST Study Group. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of nimodipine in acute stroke. Lancet 1990; 336: 1205-9.
17. Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C et al. Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute hemispheric stroke: the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS). JAMA 1995; 274: 1017-25.
18. Wade DT, Collen FM, Robb GF, Warlow CP. Physiotherapy intervention late after stroke and mobility. Br Med J 1992; 304: 609-13.
19. Dam M, Tonin P, Casson S et al. The effects of long-term rehabilitation therapy on poststroke hemiplegic patients. Stroke 1993; 24: 1186-91.
20. Young JB, Forster A. The Bradford community stroke trial: results at six months. Br Med J 1992; 304: 1085-9.
21. Gladman JRF, Lincoln NB, Barer DH. A randomised controlled trial of domiciliary and hospital-based rehabilitation for stroke patients after discharge from hospital. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 1993; 56: 960-6.
22. Taub NA, Wolfe CD, Richardson E, Burney PG. Predicting the disability of first-time stroke sufferers at 1 year. 12-month follow-up of a population-based cohort in Southeast England. Stroke 1994; 25: 352-7.
23. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Vive-Larsen J, Stoier M, Olsen TS. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part I: outcome, The Copenhagen Stroke Study Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 399-405.
24. Chino N. Efficacy of Barthel index in evaluating activities of daily living in Japan, the US and UK. Stroke 1990; 21 (suppl. II): 64-5.
25. Walker RW, Rolfe M, French JM, Rodgers H, James OFW. Age-related mortality and disability after stroke in the Gambia. Age Ageing 1995; 24 (suppl. 1): P26.
26. Woo J, Yuen YK, Kay R, Nicholls MG. Survival, disability and residence 20 months after acute stroke in a Chinese population: implications for community care. Disabil Rehabil 1992; 14: 36-40.
27. Jitapunkul S, Kamolratanakul P, Chandraprasert S, Bunnag S. Disability among Thai elderly living in Klong Toey slum. J Med Assoc Thailand 1994; 77: 231-8.
28. Anderson CS, Linto J, Stewart-Wynne EG. A populationbased assessment of the impact and burden of caregiving for long-term stroke survivors. Stroke 1995; 26: 843-9.
29. Gompertz P, Pound P, Ebrahim S. The reliability of stroke outcome measures. Clin Rehabil 1993; 7: 290-6.
30. Korner-Bitensky N, Wood-Dauphinee S. Barthel index information elicited over the telephone. Is it reliable? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 74: 9-18.
31. Gompertz P, Pound P, Ebrahim S. A postal version of the Barthel index. Clin Rehabil 1994; 8: 233-9.
32. Wade DT. Measurement in Neurological Rehabilitation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
33. Nouri FM, Lincoln NB. An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 1987; 1: 301-5.
34. McPherson K, Sloan RL, Hunter J, Dowell CM. Validation studies of the OPCS scale - more useful than the Barthel index? Clin Rehabil 1993; 7: 105-12.
35. Wellwood I, Dennis MS, Warlow CP. A comparison of the Barthel index and the OPCS disability instrument used to measure outcome after acute stroke. Age Ageing 1995; 24: 54-7.
36. Barer DH, Murphy JJ. Scaling the Barthel: a 10-point hierarchical version of the activities of daily living index for use with stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 1993; 7: 271-7.
37. Laake K, Laake P, Ranhoff AH, Sveen U, Wyller TB, BautzHolter E. The Barthel ADL index: factor structure depends upon the category of patient. Age Ageing 1995; 24: 393-7.
38. Benbow S, Sangster G, Barer D. Incontinence after stroke [letter]. Lancet 1991; 338: 1602-3.
39. Barer D, Murphy J, Morrant J, Donald I. Acute hospital care for the elderly: is there a valid performance indicator? Health Trends 1990; 22: 3-8.