Forest floor bryophytes of Pseudotsuga menziesii-Tsuga heterophylla stands in Oregon: Influences of substrate and overstory

Bryologist

Volumn 101, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 116-130

  Rambo, Thomas R ^a   Muir, Patricia S ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABIES; BRYOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTES; CONIFEROPHYTA; MARCHANTIOPHYTA; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII; PTERIDOPHYTA; TSUGA; TSUGA HETEROPHYLLA;

EID: 0031977738     PISSN: 00072745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3244083     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. ANDERSON, L. E., H. A. CRUM & W. R. BUCK. 1990. List of the mosses of North America north of Mexico. THE BRYOLOGIST 93: 448-499.
2. ANDERSSON, L. I. & H. HYTTEBORN. 1991. Bryophytes and decaying wood - a comparison between managed and natural forest. Holarctic Ecology 14: 121-130.
3. BEATTY, S. W. & E. L. STONE. 1986. The variety of soil microsites created by treefalls. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 16: 539-548.
4. BINGHAM, B. B. & J. O. SAWYER, JR. 1991. Distinctive features and definitions of young, mature, and old-growth Douglas-fir/hardwood forests. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-285.
5. BUFFO, J., L. J. FRITSCHEN & J. L. MURPHY. 1972. Direct solar radiation on various slopes from 0 to 60 degrees north latitude. USDA Forest Service Research Paper PNW-RP-142.
6. CANHAM, C. D., J. S. DENSLOW, W. J. PLATT, J. R. RUNKLE, T. A. SPIES & P. S. WHITE. 1990. Light regimes beneath closed canopies and tree-fall gaps in temperate and tropical forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20: 620-631.
7. CRUM, H. A. 1972. The geographic origins of the mosses of North America's eastern deciduous forest. Journal of Hattori Botanical Laboratory 35: 269-298.
8. DEQ (DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY). 1995. Oregon Air Quality Annual Data Summary. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Division, Portland.
9. EDWARDS, M. E. 1986. Disturbance histories of four Snowdonian woodlands and their relation to Atlantic bryophyte distributions. Biological Conservation 37: 301-320.
10. ESSEEN, P.-A., B. EHNSTRÖM, L. ERICSON & K. SJÖBERG. 1992. Boreal forests - the focal habitats of Fennoscandia, pp. 252-325. In L. Hansson (ed.), Ecological Principles of Nature Conservation. Elsevier Science Publishers, NY.
11. FEMAT (FOREST ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT TEAM). 1993. Forest ecosystem management: an ecological, economic, and social assessment. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
12. FRANKLIN, J. F. & C. T. DYRNESS. 1973. Natural vegetation of Oregon and Washington. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-8.
13. _ & T. A. SPIES. 1991. Composition, function, and structure of old-growth Douglas-fir forests. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-285.
14. _, K. CROMACK, JR., W. DENISON, A. MCKEE, C. MASER, J. SEDELL, F. SWANSON & G. JUDAY. 1981. Ecological characteristics of old-growth Douglas-fir forests. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-118.
15. FURNESS, S. B. & J. P. GRIME. 1982. Growth rate and temperature responses in bryophytes. Journal of Ecology 70: 513-523.
16. GEIGER, R. 1965. The Climate Near the Ground. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
17. GUSTAFSSON, L. & T. HALLINGBÄCK. 1988. Bryophyte flora and vegetation of managed and virgin coniferous forests in South-West Sweden. Biological Conservation 44: 283-300.
18. HALLINGBÄCK, T. 1992. The effect of air pollution on mosses in southern Sweden. Biological Conservation 59: 163-170.
19. HANSEN, A. J., T. A. SPIES, E J. SWANSON & J. L. OHMANN. 1991. Conserving biodiversity in managed forests: lessons from natural forests. BioScience 41: 382-392.
20. HITCHCOCK, C. L. & A. CRONQUIST. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press, Seattle.
21. HUTCHINSON, G. E. 1965. The Ecological Theater and the Evolutionary Play. Yale University Press, New Haven.
22. JONSSON, B. G. & P.-A. ESSEEN. 1990. Treefall disturbance maintains high bryophyte diversity in a boreal spruce forest. Journal of Ecology 78: 924-936.
23. KHANNA, K. R. 1964. Differential evolutionary activity in bryophytes. Evolution 18: 652-670.
24. KRUSKAL, J. B. 1964. Non-metric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika 29: 115-129.
25. LEE, T. D. & G. H. LA ROI. 1979. Gradient analysis of bryophytes in Jasper National Park, Alberta. Canadian Journal of Botany 57: 914-925.
26. LESICA, P., B. MCCUNE & W. S. HONG. 1991. Differences in lichen and bryophyte communities between old-growth and managed second-growth forests in the Swan Valley, Montana. Canadian Journal of Botany 69: 1745-1755.
27. MCCOMB, W. C., T. A. SPIES & W. H. EMMINGHAM. 1993. Douglas-fir forests: managing for timber and mature-forest habitat. Journal of Forestry 91: 31-42.
28. MCCUNE, B. & J. A. ANTOS. 1981. Correlations between forest layers in the Swan Valley, Montana. Ecology 62: 1196-1204.
29. _ & P. LESICA. 1992. The trade-off between species capture and quantitative accuracy in ecological inventory of lichens and bryophytes in forests in Montana. THE BRYOLOGIST 95: 296-304.
30. _ & M. J. MEFFORD. 1995. PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data. Version 2.0. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR.
31. MIELKE, P. W, JR. 1984. Meteorlogical applications of permutation techniques based on distance functions, pp. 813-830. In P. R. Krishnaiah & P. K. Sen (eds.), Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 4. Elsevier Science Publishers, NY.
32. MUELLER-DOMBOIS, D. & H. ELLENBERG. 1974. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, NY.
33. NEITLICH, P. N. & B. MCCUNE. 1997. Hotspots of epiphytic lichen diversity in two young managed forests. Conservation Biology 11: 172-182.
34. PARKER, G. G. 1983. Throughfall and stemflow in the forest nutrient cycle. Advances in Ecological Research 13: 57-134.
35. PECK, J. E., S. A. ACKER & W. A. MCKEE. 1995. Autecology of mosses in coniferous forests in the central western Cascades of Oregon. Northwest Science 69: 184-190.
36. RAO, D. N. 1982. Responses of bryophytes to air pollution, pp. 445-471. In A. J. E. Smith (ed.). Bryophyte Ecology. Chapman and Hall, London.
37. RIELEY, J. O., P. W. RICHARDS & D. L. BEBBINGTON. 1979. The ecological role of bryophytes in a North Wales woodland. Journal of Ecology 67: 497-527.
38. RINCÓN, E. 1993. Growth responses of six bryophyte species to different light intensities. Canadian Journal of Botany 71: 661-665.
39. ROBINSON, B., M. C. FELLER & K. KLINKA. 1982. Four common mosses as indicators of forest floor acidity in the Coastal Western Hemlock Zone of southwestern British Columbia. Syesis 15: 17-23.
40. SHANNON, C. E. & W. WEAVER. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. The University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
41. SHARP, A. J. 1939. Taxonomic and ecological studies of eastern Tennessee bryophytes. American Midland Naturalist 21: 267-354.
42. SLACK, N. G. 1977. Species diversity and community structure in bryophytes: New York State studies. New York State Museum Bulletin 428.
43. _. 1984. A new look at bryophyte community analysis: field and statistical methods. Journal of Hattori Botanical Laboratory 55: 113-132.
44. SÖDERSTRÖM, L. 1987. Dispersal as a limiting factor for distribution among epixylic bryophytes. Symposia Bíología Hungaríca 35: 475-483.
45. _. 1988. The occurrence of epixylic bryophytes and lichen species in an old natural and a managed forest stand in northeast Sweden. Biological Conservation 45: 169-178.
46. _. 1993. Substrate preference in some forest bryophytes: a quantitative study. Lindbergia 18: 98-103.
47. SØRENSEN, T. 1948. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content. Biologiske Skrifter 5: 1-35.
48. SPIES, T. A. & J. F. FRANKLIN. 1989. Gap characteristics and vegetation response in coniferous forests of the Pacific Northwest. Ecology 70: 543-545.
49. _ & _. 1991. The structure of natural young, mature, and old-growth Douglas-fir forests in Oregon and Washington. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-285.
50. _, _ & M. KLOPSCH. 1990. Canopy gaps in Douglas-fir forests of the Cascade Mountains. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20: 649-658.
51. SPSS INC. 1990. SPSS/PC+ V4.0 SPSS Inc., Chicago.
52. STOTLER, R. & B. CRANDALL-STOTLER. 1977. A checklist of the liverworts and hornworts of North America. THE BRYOLOGIST 80: 405-428.
53. TALLENT-HALSELL, N. G. 1994. Forest health monitoring 1994 field methods guide. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
54. TAMM, C. O. 1950. Growth and plant nutrient concentration in Hylocomium proliferum (L.) Lindb. in relation to tree canopy. Oikos 2: 60-64.
55. _. 1951. Removal of plant nutrients from tree crowns by rain. Physiologia Plantarum 4: 184-188.
56. _. 1953. Growth, yield and nutrition in carpets of a forest moss (Hylocomium splendens). Meddelanden från Statens Skogsforskningsinstitut 43.
57. TARKHOVA, T. N. & V. S. IPATOV. 1975. Influence of illumination and litter-drop on the development of certain species of mosses. Ekologiya 1: 58-65.
58. TARRANT, R. F., K. C. LU, W. B. BOLLEN & C. S. CHEN. 1968. Nutrient cycling by throughfall and stemflow precipitation in three coastal Oregon forest types. USDA Forest Service Research Paper PNW-RP-54.
59. TAYLOR, G. H. 1993. Normal annual precipitation: State of Oregon, 1960-1990. Oregon Climate Service, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
60. TUHKANEN, S. 1980. Climatic parameters and indices in plant geography. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 67.
61. USDA & USDI. 1994. Record of decision for amendments to Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management planning documents within the range of the Northern Spotted Owl. 1994-589-111/00001. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
62. WALTER, H. 1985. Vegetation of the Earth and Ecological Systems of the Geobiosphere. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
63. WINNER, W. E. 1988. Responses of bryophytes to air pollution, pp. 141-173. In T. H. Nash & V. Wirth (eds.), Lichens, Bryophytes and Air Quality. J. Cramer, Berlin.
64. WYATT, R. 1992. Conservation of rare and endangered bryophytes: input from population genetics. Biological Conservation 59: 99-107.