Automated image analysis system for detecting boundaries of live prostate cancer cells

Cytometry

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 287-294

  Simon, Inpakala ^a   Pound, Charles R ^a   Partin, Alan W ^a   Clemens, James Q ^a   Christens Barry, William A ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer; Cell; Image segmentation; Microscopy; Morphometry; Motility; Prostate

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CELL MOTILITY; CELL STRUCTURE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; MALE; NONHUMAN; PHASE CONTRAST MICROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; RAT;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CELL MOVEMENT; IMAGE CYTOMETRY; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MICROSCOPY, INTERFERENCE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RATS; TUMOR CELLS, CULTURED;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0031976698     PISSN: 01964763     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19980401)31:4<287::AID-CYTO8>3.0.CO;2-G     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Brown DC, Gatter KC: Monoclonal antibody Ki-67: Its use in histopathology. Histopathology 17:489-503, 1990.
2. Chan KL: Quantitative characterization of electron micrograph image using fractal feature. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 42:1033-1037, 1995.
3. Clements JD, Buzy JM: Automated image analysis for counting unstained cultured neurones. J Neurosci Methods 36:1-8, 1991.
4. Dejter SW Jr, Cunningham RE, Noguchi PD, Jones RV, Moul JW, McLeod DG, Lynch JH: Prognostic significance of DNA ploitty in carcinoma of prostate. Urology 33:361-366, 1989.
5. Gleason DF: Histological grading and clinical staging of prostate carcinoma. In: Urologic Pathology: The Prostate, Tannenbaum M (ed). Lea & Febinger, Philadelphia, 1977, pp. 171-197.
6. Gundlach H: Phase contrast and differential interference contrast instrumentation and applications in cell, developmental, and marine biology. Opt Eng 32:3223-3228, 1993.
7. Haralick R, Shapiro L: Image segmentation techniques. Comput Vis Graphics Image Processing 29:100-132, 1985.
8. Hoffman R, Gross L: Modulation contrast microscope. Appl Opt 14:1169-1176, 1975.
9. Lachney CL, Lonergan TA: Regulation of cell shape in Euglena gracilis. III. Involvement of stable microtubules. J Cell Sci 74:219-237, 1985.
10. Leitner F, Paillasson S, Ronot X, Demongeot J: Dynamic functional and structural analysis of living cells: New tools for vital staining of nuclear DNA and for characterization of cell motion. Acta Biotheor (Leiden) 43:299-317, 1995.
11. Lieberman SJ, Hamasaki T, Satir P: Ultrastructure and motion analysis of permeabilized paramecium capable of motility and regulation of motility. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 9:73-84, 1988.
12. Mohler JL, Partin AW, Coffey DS: Prediction of metastatic potential by a new grading system of cell motility: Validation in the Dunning R-3327 prostatic adenocarcinoma model. J Urol 138:168-170, 1987.
13. Mohler JL, Partin AW, Isaacs JT, Coffey DS: Metastatic potential prediction by a visual grading system of cell motility: Prospective validation in the Dunning R-3327 prostatic adenocarcinoma model. Cancer Res 48:4312-4317, 1988.
14. Mohler JL, Partin AW, Isaacs WB, Coffey DS: Time lapse videomicroscopic identification of Dunning R-3327 adenocarcinoma and normal rat prostate cells. J Urol 137:544-547, 1987.
15. NIH Image Manual for public domain NIH Image program, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; available at http:// rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image.
16. American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts and Figures-1997. American Cancer Society Inc., Atlanta, 1997; p. 25.
17. Partin AW, Isaacs JT, Trieger B, Coffey DS: Early cell motility associated with an increase in metastatic ability in rat prostatic cancer cells transfected with the v-IIarvcy-ras oncogene. Cancer Res 48:6050-6053, 1988.
18. Partin AW, Mohler JL, Coffey DS: Cell motility as an index of metastatic ability in prostate cancers: Results with an animal model and with human cancer cells. In: Therapy for Genitourinary Cancer, Lepor H, Lawson RK (ed.s). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Hingham, MA, 1992, pp. 121-130.
19. Partin AW, Schoeniger JS, Mohler JL, Coffey DS: Fourier analysis of cell motility: Correlation of motility with metastatic potential. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:1254-1258, 1989.
20. Partin AW: A quantitative analysis of tumor cell motility: Prostate cancer. Dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, 1988.
21. Poon SSS, Ward RK, Palcic B: Automated image detection and segmentation in blood smears. Cytometry 13:766-774, 1992.
22. Russ JC: The Image Processing Handbook, Ed. 2. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1995, pp 165, 173-175, 347-349, 469-474.
23. Sahoo PK, Saltani AK, Wong AKC, Chen YC: A survey of thresholding techniques. Comput Vis Graphics Image Processing 41:233-260, 1988.
24. Soll D; The use of computers in understanding how animal cells move. Int Rev Cytol 163:43-104, 1995.
25. Thomas DJ, Robinson M, King P, Hasan T, Charlton R, Martin J, Carr TW, Neal DE: p53 expression and clinical outcome in prostate cancer. Br J Urol 72:778-781, 1993.
26. Veselý P, Lüers H, Riehle M, Bereiter-Hahn J: Subtraction scanning acoustic microscopy reveals motility domains in cells in vitro. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 29:231-240, 1994.
27. Wu K, Gauthier D, Levine MD: Live cell image segmentation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 42:1-12, 1995.
28. Xu-van Opstal WY, Ranger C, Lejeune O, Forgez F, Boudin H, Bisconte JC, Rostene W: Automated image analyzing system for the quantitative study of living cells in culture. Microsc Res Tech 28:449-447, 1994.