Impending recovery of Kirtland's warbler: Case study in the effectiveness of the endangered species act

Environmental Management

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 9-17

  Solomon, Barry D ^a  

^a MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Brown headed cowbird; Endangered species; Endangered Species Act; Jack pine; Kirtland's warbler

Indexed keywords

HABITAT MANAGEMENT; NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT; PROPERTY RIGHTS;

ECOLOGY; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; PEST CONTROL;

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT; ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION; HABITAT MANAGEMENT; KIRLAND'S WARBLER; KIRTLAND'S WARBLER; LEGISLATION; LEGISLATIVE IMPACT; NATIONAL STRATEGY; NATURE CONSERVATION; POPULATION INCREASE; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

BIRD; LAW; MANAGEMENT; PARASITE; POLITICS; REVIEW; SOCIOECONOMICS;

AVES; DENDROICA; DENDROICA KIRTLANDII; MOLOTHRUS ATER; PARAGNETINA; PINACEAE; PINUS BANKSIANA;

EID: 0031973445     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002679900080     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Babbitt, B. 1994. The Mio model. Defenders 69(3):8, 36-37.
2. Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter of Communities for a Great Oregon et al. 1995. Supreme Court of the United States. 385 U.S. 116, 875 Ct 339 [Ed 2d 235 (1995)].
3. Byelich, J., M. E. DeCapita, G. W. Irvine, N. I. Johnson, W. R. Jones, W. J. Mahalak, H. Mayfield, and R. E. Radtke. 1985. Kirtland's warbler recovery plan. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Kirtland's Warbler Recovery Team, Washington, DC, 78 pp.
4. Clark, T. W. 1992. Practicing natural resource management with a policy orientation. Environmental Management 16:423-433.
5. Clark, T. W., and R. Westrum. 1987. Paradigms and ferrets. Social Studies of Science 17:3-33.
6. Clark, T. W., R. Crete, and J. Cada. 1989. Designing and managing successful endangered species recovery programs. Environmental Management 13:159-170.
7. Clark, T. W., R. P. Reading, and A. L. Clarke (eds.). 1994. Endangered species recovery: Finding the lessons, improving the process. Island Press, Washington, DC, 450 pp.
8. Dwyer, L. E., and D. D. Murphy. 1995. Fulfilling the promise: Reconsidering and reforming the California Endangered Species Act. Natural Resources Journal 35:735-770.
9. Ernst, J. P. 1991. Federalism and the act. Pages 98-113 in K. A. Kohm (ed.), Balancing on the brink of extinction: The Endangered Species Act and lessons for the future. Island Press, Washington, DC.
10. Gordon, R. E. 1994. Help landowners save endangered species. Insight 30 May.
11. Houck, O. A. 1993. The Endangered Species Act and its implementation by the US Departments of Interior and Commerce. University of Colorado Law Review 64:296-307.
12. Kellert, S. R. 1985. Socioeconomic factors in endangered species management. Journal of Wildlife Management 49:528-536.
13. Kellert, S. R. 1986. Social and perceptual factors in the preservation of species. In B. G. Norton (ed.), The preservation of species. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
14. Keystone Center. 1995. The Keystone dialogue on incentives for private landowners to protect endangered species. Washington, DC, 47pp.
15. Lande, R. 1995. Mutation and conservation. Conservation Biology 9(4):782-791.
16. Lange, J. 1993. The logic of competing information campaigns: Conflict over old growth and the spotted owl. Communication Monographs 60:239-257.
17. Loomis, J. B., and D. S. White. 1996. Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: Summary and meta-analysis. Ecological Economics 18:197-206.
18. Lynch, M. 1996. A quantitative-genetic perspective on conservation issues. Pages 471-501 in J. C. Avise and J. L. Hamrick (eds.), Conservation genetics: Case histories from nature. Chapman & Hall, New York.
19. Mann, C. C., and M. L. Plummer. 1995. Noah's choice: The future of endangered species. Alfred A. Knopf, New, York, 302 pp.
20. Mayfield, H. F. 1953. A census of the Kirtland's warbler. Auk 70:17-20.
21. Mayfield, H. F. 1960. The Kirtland's warbler. Cranbrook Institute of Science, Bulletin 40, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, 242 pp.
22. Mayfield, H. F. 1993. Kirtland's warblers benefit from large forest tracts. Wilson Bulletin 105:351-353.
23. MDNR (Michigan Department of Natural Resources). 1992. Kirtland's warbler: Michigan's bird of the jack pine. Wildlife Division Report, Lansing, 12 pp.
24. Miller, L. 1995. Have binoculars, will travel: In pursuit of rarities, bird-watchers boost tourism. The Wall Street Journal, 15 December, pp. B1, B4.
25. NRC (National Research Council). 1995. Science and the Endangered Specks Act. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 271 pp.
26. Peterson, T. R., and C. C. Horton. 1995. Rooted in the soil: How understanding the perspectives of landowners can enhance the management of environmental disputes. The Quarterly Journal of Speech 81:139-166.
27. Probst, J. R. 1986. A review of factors limiting the Kirtland's warbler on its breeding grounds. The American Midland Naturalist 116:87-100.
28. Probst, J. R., and J. Weinrich. 1993. Relating Kirtland's warbler population to changing landscape composition and structure. Landscape Ecology 8:257-271.
29. Sellers, S. L. 1994. The grizzly state of the Endangered Species Act: An analysis of the ESA's effectiveness in conserving the Yellowstone grizzly bear population. Land and Water Law Review 29:467-503.
30. Simon, J. L., and A. Wildavsky. 1992. Species loss revisited. Society 29(6):41-46.
31. Smith, R. J. 1994. Fire, rats, and the Endangered Species Act. Regulation 16(4):14-16.
32. Stone, R. 1995. Incentives offer hope for habitat. Science 269:1212-1213.
33. Terborgh, J. W. 1989. Where have all the birds gone? Princeton University Press, Princeton, 207 pp.
34. Trauger, D. L., and C. I. Bocetti. 1993. Kirtland's warbler recovery team effectively coordinates interagency research and management. Endangered Species Technical Bulletin 18(2): 14-17.
35. US Department of the Interior. 1973. Endangered Species Act of 1973. Public Law 93-205.81. Stat. 884. 28 December. Current version at 16 U.S.C. (1531-1543).
36. US Senate. 1987. Senate Report 100-240, 100th Congress, 1st Session. The Endangered Species Act Amendments of 1987.
37. Walkinshaw, L. H. 1983. Kirtland's warbler: The natural history of an endangered species. Cranbrook Institute of Science, Bulletin 58, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, 207 pp.
38. Weinrich, J. 1996a. The Kirtland's warbler in 1995. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife Division Report No. 3243, Houghton Lake, Michigan, 13 pp.
39. Wells, D. T. 1996. Environmental policy. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 212 pp.
40. Wondolleck, J. M., S. L. Yaffee, and J. E. Crowfoot. 1994. A conflict management perspective: applying the principles of alternative dispute resolution. Pages 305-326 in T. W. Clark, R. P. Reading, and A. L. Clarke (eds.), Endangered species recovery. Island Press, Washington, DC.
41. Yaffee, S. L. 1982. Prohibitive policy: Implementing the federal Endangered Species Act. MIT Press, Cambridge.
42. Yaffee, S. L. 1991. Avoiding endangered species/development conflicts through interagency consultation. Pages 86-97 in K. A. Kohm (ed.), Balancing on the brink of extinction: The Endangered Species Act and lessons for the future. Island Press, Washington, DC.
43. Yaffee, S. L. 1994. The wisdom of the spotted owl. Island Press, Washington, DC.
44. Yaffee, S. L. 1995. Lessons about leadership from the history of the spotted owl controversy. Natural Resources Journal 35:381-412.
45. Zou, X., C. Theiss, and B. V. Barnes. 1992. Pattern of Kirtland's warbler occurrence in relation to the landscape structure of its summer habitat in northern Lower Michigan. Landscape Ecology 6:221-231.