The further validation and precision of the NIAF-R

Brain Injury

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 155-164

  Semlyen, J K ^a   Barnes, M P ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEAD INJURY; HUMAN; MALE; RATING SCALE;

EID: 0031973318     PISSN: 02699052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/026990598122782     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. JOHNSTON, M. V. and HALL, K. M.: Outcomes evaluation in TBI rehabilitation. Part I: Overview and system principles. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75: SC2-SC9, 1994.
2. SEMLYEN, J. K., HURRELL, E., CARTER, S. et al.: The Newcastle Independence Assessment Form (Research): development of an alternative measure. Journal of Neurologic Rehabilitation, 10: 251-257, 1996.
3. HALL, K. M. and JOHNSTON, M. V.: Outcomes Evaluation in TBI Rehabilitation. Part II: Measurement tools for a nationwide data system. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75: SC10-SC18, 1994.
4. ROTH, E., DAVIDOFF, G., HAUGHTON, J. et al.: Functional assessment in spinal cord injury: a comparison of the Modified Barthel Index and the 'adapted' Functional Independence Measure. Clinical Rehabilitation, 4: 277-285, 1990.
5. JOHNSTON, M. V., FINDLEY, T. W., DELUCA, J. et al.: Research in physical medicine and rehabilitation. XII. Measurement tools with application to brain injury. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 70: 40-56, 1991.
6. STREINER, D. L. and NORMAN, G. R.: Health Measurement Scales. A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 1995.
7. KEITH, R. A.: Functional assessment measures in medical rehabilitation: current status. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 65, 74-78, 1984.
8. JOHNSTON, M. V., KEITH, R. A. and HINDERER, S. R.: Measurement standards for interdisciplinary medical rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73: S3-S23, 1992.
9. GUYATT, G., WALTER, S. and NORMAN, G.: Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40: 171-178, 1987.
10. BERGNER, M., BOBBITT, R. A., CARTER, W. B. et al.: The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Medical Care, 19: 787-805, 1981.
11. MACKENZIE, C. R., CHARLSON, M. E., DIGIOIA, D. et al.: Can the Sickness Impact Profile measure change: an example of scale assessment. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 39: 429-438, 1986.
12. HAMILTON, B. B., GRANGER, C. V., SHERWIN, F. S. et al.: A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. In: M. Fuhrer (editor) Rehabilitation Outcomes: Analysis and Measurement (Baltimore: Brookes), 1987, pp. 137-147.
13. KEITH, R. A., GRANGER, C. V., HAMILTON, B. B. et al.: The Functional Independence Measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation, 11: 6-18, 1987.
14. SANTA CLARA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTRE. Functional Assessment Measure. Santa Clara Valley Medical Centre, Department of Rehabilitation. 751 So. Bascom Avenue, San Jose, CA, USA.
15. HALL, K. M.: Overview of functional assessment scales in brain injury rehabilitation. Neurorehabilitation, 2: 98-113, 1992.
16. RAPPAPORT, M., HALL, K. M., HOPKINS, K. et al.: Disability Rating Scale for severe head trauma - coma to community. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 63: 18-123, 1982.
17. HALL, K. M., HAMILTON, B. B., GORDON, W. A. et al.: Characteristics and comparisons of functional assessment indices: Disability Rating Scale, Functional Independence Measure and Functional Assessment Measure. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8: 60-74, 1993.
18. NOVAK, T., BERGQUIST, T. F., BENNETT, G. et al.: Primary caregiver distress following severe head injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 6: 69-77, 1991.
19. BOWERS, D. N. and KOFROTH, L. K.: Comparisons of Disability Rating Scale and Functional Independence Measure during recovery from traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 70: A58, 1989.
20. HALL, K. M., MANN, N., HIGH, W. M. et al.: Functional measures after traumatic brain injury: ceiling effects of FIM, FIM + FAM, DRS and CIQ. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 11: 27-39, 1996.
21. MAHONEY, F. I. and BARTHEL, D. W.: Functional evaluation: Barthel index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14: 61-65, 1965.
22. GRANGER, C. V., DEWIS, L. S., PETEBS, N. C. et al.: Stroke rehabilitation: analysis of repeated Barthel index measures. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 60: 14-17, 1979.
23. ROY, C. W., TOGNIERI, J., HAY, E. et al.: An inter-rater reliability study of the Barthel index. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 11: 67-70, 1988.
24. COLLIN, C., DAVIS, S., HORNE, V. et al.: Reliability of the Barthel index. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 10: 356-357, 1987.
25. WADE, D. T. and COLLIN, C.: The Barthel ADL index: a standard measure of physical disability? International Disability Studies, 10: 64-67, 1988.
26. KIDD, D., STEWART, G., BALDRY, J. et al.: The Functional Independence Measure: a comparative validity and reliability study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 17: 10-14, 1995.
27. OLVER, J. H.: Brain injury: the need to assess outcome. Current Opinion in Neurology, 8: 443-446, 1995.
28. BROOKS, N.: Closed Head Injury: Psychological, Social and Family Consequences (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 1984.
29. KNEIPP, S.: Family and community re-entry. In: J. M. Williams and T. Kay (editors) Head Injury: a family matter (Baltimore: Brookes), 1991.
30. WILLER, B., LINN, R. and ALLEN, K.: Community integration and barriers to integration for individuals with brain injury. In: M. A. J. Finlayson and S. Garner (editors) Brain Injury Rehabilitation: clinical considerations (Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins), 1993, pp. 355-375.
31. WILLER, B., ROSENTHAL, M., KREUTZER, J. S. et al.: Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8: 75-87, 1993.
32. MASSON, F., MAURETTE, P., SALIM, L. R. et al.: Prevalence of impairments 5 years after a head injury and their relationship with disabilities and outcome. Brain Injury, 10: 487-497, 1996.
33. SBORDONE, R. J., LITER, J. C. and PETTLER-JENNINGS, P.: Recovery of function following severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective 10-year follow-up. Brain Injury, 9: 285-299, 1995.
34. RAPPAPORT, M., HERRERO-BACKE, C., RAPPAPORT, M. L. et al.: Head injury outcome up to ten years later. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 70: 885-892, 1995.
35. MORTON, M. V. and WEHMAN, P.: Psychosocial and emotional sequelae of individuals with traumatic brain injury: a literature review and recommendations. Brain Injury, 9: 81-92, 1995.
36. HARRICK, L., KREFTING, I., JOHNSTON, J. et al.: Stability of functional outcomes following transitional programme participation. Brain Injury, 8, 439-447, 1994.
37. POWELL, G. E. and WILSON, S. L.: Recovery curves for patients who have suffered very severe brain injury. Clinical Rehabilitation, 8: 54-69, 1994.
38. KOLB, B. and WISHAW, I. Q.: Fundamentals of human neuropsychology (New York: WH Freeman), 1990.
39. LEVIN, H. S., GROSSMAN, R. G., ROSE, J. E. et al.: Long term neuropsychological outcome of closed head injury. Journal of Neurosurgery, 50, 412-422, 1979.
40. JENNETT, B. and BOND, M.: Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. A practical scale. Lancet, 1: 480-484, 1975.
41. HALL, K. M., COPE, D. N. and RAPPAPORT, M.: Glasgow Outcome Scale and Disability Rating Scale: comparative usefulness in following recovery in traumatic head injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 66: 35-37, 1985.