Ecosystems and the law: Toward an integrated approach

Ecological Applications

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 332-341

  Keiter, Robert B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Biodiversity conservation; Ecosystem management and law; Ecosystem management policy; Ecosystems and private property; Endangered Species Act of 1973; Environmental law; National Environmental Policy Act of 1969; National Forest Management Act of 1976; Natural resources law; Private property rights; Property rights, legal theory of; Public lands

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL LAW;

USA;

EID: 0031971323     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0332:EATLTA]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Review

References (97)

1. Agins v. City of Tiburon. 1980. United States [Supreme Court] Reports 447:255-263.
2. Albrecht, V. 1994. Ecosystem management and the private landowner. Pages 107-111 in U.S. Senate, Committee on Environment and Public Works. Ecosystem management: status and potential. Senate Print 103-98. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., USA.
3. Anderson, T., and D. Leal. 1991. Free market versus political environmentalism. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 15:297-310,
4. Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter of Communities. 1995. United States [Supreme Court] Reports 515:687-736.
5. Bada, C. 1995. Federal agency management plans are "on-going" actions under Endangered Species Act's section 7: Pacific Rivers Council v. Thomas and Northwest Forest Resources Council (Casenote). Natural Resources Journal 35: 981-996.
6. Blumm, M. 1994. Public choice theory and the public lands: why "multiple use" failed. Harvard Environmental Law Review 18:405-432.
7. _. 1995. The end of environmental law? Libertarian property, natural law, and the just compensation clause in the Federal Circuit. Environmental Law 25:171-198.
8. Bosselman, F. and D. Tarlock. 1994. Symposium on ecology and the law. Chicago-Kent Law Review 69:843-985.
9. Botkin, D. B. 1990. Discordant harmonies: a new ecology for the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
10. Breckenridge, L. 1995. Reweaving the landscape: the institutional challenges of ecosystem management for lands in private ownership. Vermont Law Review 19:363-422.
11. Cheever, F. 1991. An introduction to the prohibition against takings in section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973: learning to live with a powerful species preservation law. University of Colorado Law Review 62:109-199.
12. Chrislensen, N., A. Bartuska, J. Brown, S. Carpenter, C. D'Antonio, R. Francis, J. Franklin, J. MacMahon, R. Noss, D. Parsons, C. Peterson, M. Turner, and R. Woodmansee. 1996. The report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management. Ecological Applications 6:665-691.
13. Congressional Research Service. 1994. Ecosystem management: Federal agency activities. 94-339 ENR. U.S. Library of Congress, Washington, D.C., USA.
14. Conner v. Burford [United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit]. 1988. Federal Reporter, second series 848:1441-1464.
15. Conner, H. J. 1994. Intergovernmental coordination in ecosystem management. Pages 229-242 in U.S. Senate, Committee on Environment and Public Works. Ecosystem management: status and potential. Senate Print 103-98. Congressional Research Service. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 331 pp.
16. Conner, H. J., M. A. Shannon, M. G. Wallace, S. Burke, and M. Moote. 1994. Institutional barriers and incentives for ecosystem management: a problem analysis. Water Resources Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
17. Dolan v. City of Tigard. 1994. United States [Supreme Court] Reports 512:374-414.
18. Doremus, H. 1991. Patching the ark: improving legal protection of biological diversity. Ecology Law Quarterly 18:265-333.
19. Farrier, D. 1995. Conserving biodiversity on private lands: incentives for management or compensation for lost expectations? Harvard Environmental Law Review 19:303-408.
20. Fink, R. J. 1994. The National Wildlife Refuges: theory, practice, and prospect. Harvard Environmental Law Review 18: 1-135.
21. Fischer, H. 1995. Wolf wars: the remarkable inside story of the restoration of wolves to Yellow-stone. Falcon Press, Helena, Montana, USA.
22. Freyfogle, E. 1993. Ownership and ecology. Case Western Reserve Law Review 43:1269-1297.
23. GAO [United States General Accounting Office]. 1994. Ecosystem management: additional actions needed to adequately test a promising approach. GAO/RCED-94-111. U.S. General Accounting Office, Washington, D.C., USA.
24. Gates, P. 1968. History of public land law development. Arno Press, New York, New York, USA.
25. Gilbert, V. C. 1988. Cooperation in ecosystem management. Pages 180-192 in J. K. Agee and D. R. Johnson, editors. Ecosystem management for parks and wilderness. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington, USA.
26. Grumbine, R. E. 1992. Ghost bears: exploring the biodiversity crisis. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
27. _. 1994. What is ecosystem management? Conservation Biology 8:27-38.
28. Haeuber, R. 1996. Setting the environmental policy agenda: the case of ecosystem management. Natural Resources Journal 36:1-28.
29. Haynes, R. W., R. T. Russell, and T. M. Quigley, technical editors. 1996. A framework for ecosystem management in the interior Columbia Basin including portions of the Klamath and Great Basins. PNW-GTR-374. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon, USA.
30. Houck, O. 1993. The Endangered Species Act and its implementation by the U.S. Departments of Interior and Commerce. University of Colorado Law Review 64:277-359.
31. Huffman, J. 1994. The inevitability of private rights in publiclands. University of Colorado Law Review 65:241-278.
32. Humbach, J. 1989. Law and a new land ethic. Minnesota Law Review 74:339-370.
33. Interagency Ecosystem Management Task Force. 1995a. The ecosystem approach: healthy ecosystems and sustainable economies. Volume I. Overview. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia, USA.
34. _. 1995b. The ecosystem approach: healthy ecosystems and sustainable economies. Volume II. Implementation issues. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia, USA.
35. Karp, J. 1993. A private property duty of stewardship: changing our land ethic. Environmental Law 23:735-762.
36. Keiter, R. B. 1989. Taking account of the ecosystem on the public domain: law and ecology in the Greater Yellowstone Region. University of Colorado Law Review 60:924-1007.
37. _. 1990. NEPA and the emerging concept of ecosystem management on the public lands. Land and Water Law Review 25:43-60.
38. _. 1994a. Beyond the boundary line: constructing a law of ecosystem management. University of Colorado Law Review 65:293-333.
39. _. 1994b. Conservation biology and the law: assessing the challenges ahead. Chicago-Kent Law Review 69:911-934.
40. Kemmis, D. 1990. Community and the politics of place. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
41. Keystone Center. 1996. Keystone national policy dialogue on ecosystem management: implementing community-based approaches. Keystone Center, Keystone, Colorado, USA.
42. Kunich, J. 1994. The fallacy of deathbed conservation under the Endangered Species Act. Environmental Law 24:501-580.
43. Lackey, R. In press. Seven pillars of ecosystem management. Landscape and Urban Planning.
44. Lee, K. N. 1993. Compass and gyroscope: integrating science and politics for the environment. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
45. Lockhart, W. J. 1988. External park threats and interior's limits: the need for an independent park service. Pages 3-74 in D. Simon, editor. Our common lands: defending the National Parks. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
46. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council. 1992. United States [Supreme Court] Reports 505:1003-1078.
47. Lynch, S. 1996. The Federal Advisory Committee Act: an obstacle to ecosystem management by Federal agencies. Washington Law Review 71:431-459.
48. Manson, C. 1994. Natural communities conservation planning: California's new ecosystem approach to biodiversity. Environmental Law 24:603-616.
49. Marble Mountain Audubon Society v. Rice [United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit]. 1990. Federal Reporter, second series 914:179-183.
50. Martinez, J. 1994. Statutes enacting takings law: flying in the face of uncertainty. Urban Lawyer 26:327-345.
51. McElfish, J. 1994. Property rights, property roots: rediscovering the basis for legal protection of the environment. Environmental Law Reporter: News and Analysis. 24:10231-10249.
52. McHarg, H. 1995. The Federal Advisory Committee Act: keeping interjurisdictional ecosystem management groups open and legal. Journal of Energy, Natural Resources, and vironmental Law 15:437-472.
53. Moote, M. A., S. Burke, H. J. Conner, and M. G. Wallace. 1994. Principles of ecosystem management. Water Resources Research Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
54. Nash, R. 1982. Wilderness and the American mind. Third edition. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
55. _. 1989. The rights of nature: a history of environmental ethics. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
56. National Park Service. 1994. Restructuring plan for the National Park Service. National Park Service, Washington, D.C., USA.
57. National Wildlife Federation v. National Park Service [District Court, Wyoming]. 1987. Federal Supplement 669:384-392.
58. Nollan v. California Coastal Commission. 1987. United States [Supreme Court] Reports 483:825-867.
59. Noss, R. F., and A. Y. Cooperrider. 1994. Saving nature's legacy: protecting and restoring biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
60. O'Toole, R. 1988. Reforming the Forest Service. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
61. Pacific Rivers Council v. Thomas [United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit]. 1994. Federal Reporter, third series 30:1050-1057.
62. Reed, S. W. 1993-1994. The county supremacy movement: mendacious myth marketing. Idaho Law Review 30:525-553.
63. Resources Ltd. v. Robertson [United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit]. 1993. Federal Reporter, third series 8:1394-1403: withdrawn and republished at Federal Reporter, third series 35:1300-1308.
64. Resources Ltd. v. Robertson [United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit]. 1993. Federal Reporter, third series 8:1394- 1403: withdrawn and republished at Federal Reporter, third series 35:1300-1308.
65. Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council. 1989. United States [Supreme Court] Reports 490:332-359.
66. Rohlf, D., and D. L. Honnold. 1988. Managing the balance of nature: the leaal framework of wilderness management. Ecology Law Quarterly 15:249-279.
67. Romm, J. 1994. Jurisdictional relations in ecosystem management: some observations from California. Pages 97-106 in U.S. Senate, Committee on Environment and Public Works. Ecosystem management: status and potential. Senate Print 103-98. Congressional Research Service. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 331 pp.
68. Rose, C. 1991. Rethinking environmental controls: management strategies for common resources. Duke Law Journal 1991:1-38.
69. Ruhl, J. B. 1995. Biodiversity conservation and the ever-expanding web of Federal laws regulating nonfederal lands: Time for something completely different? University of Colorado Law Review 66:555-673.
70. Runte, A. 1987. National Parks: the American experience. Second edition. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.
71. Sax, J. 1993. Property rights and the economy of nature: understanding Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council. Stanford Law Review 45:1412-1455.
72. Sax, J., and R. Keiler. 1987. Glacier National Park and its neighbors: a study of Federal interagency relations. Ecology Law Quarterly 14:207-263.
73. Seattle Audubon Society v. Lyons [Western District Federal Court, Washington State]. 1994. Federal Supplement 871: 1291-1327. Affirmed under the name Seattle Audubon Society v. Moseley [United States Court of Appeals. Ninth Circuit]. 1996. Federal Reporter, third series 80:1401-1406.
74. Seattle Audubon Society v. Lyons [Western District Federal Court, Washington State]. 1994. Federal Supplement 871: 1291-1327. Affirmed under the name Seattle Audubon Society v. Moseley [United States Court of Appeals. Ninth Circuit]. 1996. Federal Reporter, third series 80:1401-1406.
75. Shannon, M. A. 1993. Community governance: an enduring institution of democracy. Pages 219-246 in U.S. Congress House of Representatives, Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs. Multiple use and sustained yield: changing philoophies for Federal land management. Print Number 11. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., USA.
76. _. 1994. Coordination among Federal agencies: cultures, budgets, and policies. Pages 209-228 in U.S. Senate, Committee on Environment and Public Works, Ecosystem management: status and potential. Senate Print 103-98. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., USA.
77. Sierra Club v. Marita [United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit]. 1995. Federal Reporter, third series 46:606-624.
78. Sierra Club v. Yeutter [United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit]. 1991. Federal Reporter, second series 926:429-440.
79. Silver v. Babbitt [District Court, Arizona]. 1995. Federal Supplement 924:976-989.
80. Slocombe, D. S. 1993. Environmental planning, ecosystem science, and ecosystem approaches for integrating environment and development. Environmental Management 17: 289-303.
81. Society of American Foresters. 1993. Task force report on sustaining long-term forest health and productivity. Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
82. Tarlock, D. 1993. Local government protection of biodiversity: what is its niche? University of Chicago Law Review 60:555-613.
83. Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill. 1978. United States [Supreme Court] Reports 437:153-213.
84. Thomas v. Peterson [United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit]. 1985. Federal Reporter, second series 753:754-765.
85. Thompson, B. 1996. Resource use and the emerging law of takings: a realistic appraisal. Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Institute 42:2-1 to 2-8. Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation, Denver, Colorado, USA.
86. Trombulak, S. 1995. Ecological health and the northern forest. Vermont Law Review 19:283-334.
87. United States Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. 1994. Ecosystem management: status and potential (Congressional Research Service workshop summary). Senate Print 103-98. United States Government Printing Office. Washington, D.C., USA.
88. United States v. Nye County, Nevada [District Court, Nevada]. 1996. Federal Supplement 920:1108-1120.
89. USDA [United States Department of Agriculture] Forest Service. 1995. National Forest System land and resource management planning; proposed rule. Federal Register 60: 18886-18932 (13 April).
90. USDA [United States Department of Agriculture] Forest Service and USDI [United States Department of the Interior] Bureau of Land Management. 1994. Record of Decision for amendments to Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management planning documents within the range of the Northern Spotted Owl. Portland, Oregon, USA.
91. USDI-BLM [United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management]. 1994. Ecosystem management in the BLM: from concept to commitment. 1994-573-183. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., USA.
92. USDI-FWS [United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service]. 1993. Grizzly Bear Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Missoula, Montana, USA.
93. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. 1926. United States [Supreme Court] Reports 272:365-397.
94. Warburg, P., and J. McElfish, Jr. 1994. Environmental Law Reporter: News and Analysis 24:10520-10535.
95. Wheeler, D. P. 1993. Foreword: a strategy for the future. Stanford Environmental Law Journal 12:ix-xv.
96. Wilkinson, C. F. 1992. Crossing the next meridian: land, water, and the future of the West. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
97. Wilkinson, C., and M. Anderson. 1985. Land and resource planning in the National Forests. Oregon Law Review 64: 1-373.