Accuracy of observational kinematic assessment of upper-limb movements

Physical Therapy

Volumn 78, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 259-270

  Bernhardt, Julie ^a   Bate, Patricia J ^a   Matyas, Thomas A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Assessment; Cerebrovascular disorders; Kinematics; Observational assessment; Reliability; Upper limb; Validity

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATION; OBSERVATION; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VIDEORECORDER;

EID: 0031967799     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/78.3.259     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Patla A, Proctor J, Morson B. Observations on aspects of visual gait assessment: a questionnaire study. Physiotherapy Canada. 1987;39:311-316.
2. Malouin F. Observational gait analysis. In: Craik RL, Oatis CA, eds. Gait Analysis: Theory and Applications. St Louis. Mo: Mosby; 1995:112-124.
3. Bobath B. Adult Hemiplegia: Evaluation and Treatment. 3rd ed. London, England: William Heinemann Medical Books Ltd; 1990.
4. Carr J, Shepherd R. A Motor Relearning Programme for Stroke. London, England: William Heinemann Medical Books Ltd; 1982.
5. Moore S, Schurr K, Wales A, et al. Observation and analysis of hemiplegic gait: swing phase. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 1993; 39:271-278.
6. Moseley A, Wales A, Herbert R, et al. Observation and analysis of hemiplegic gait: stance phase. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 1993; 39:259-267.
7. Herbert R, Moore S, Moseley A, et al. Making inferences about muscle forces from clinical observations. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 1993;39:195-201.
8. Eastlack M, Arvidson J, Danoff J, McGarvey C. Interrater reliability of videotaped observational gait-analysis assessment. Phys Ther. 1991;71: 465-472.
9. Goodkin R, Diller L. Reliabilitv among physical therapists in diagnosis and treatment of gait deviations in hemiplegics. Percept Mot Skills. 1973;37:727-734.
10. Krebs DE, Edelstein JE, Fishman S. Reliability of observational kinematic gait analysis. Phys Ther. 1985;65:1027-1033.
11. Patla AE, Clouse SD. Visual assessment of human gait: reliability and validity. Rehabilitation Research. October 1988:87-96.
12. Spencer KI, Goldie PA, Matyas TA. Criterion-related validity of visual assessment of the temporal symmetry of hemiplegic gait. In: Proceedings of the Australian Physiotherapy Association National Congress, 1992, Adelaide, Australia. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Australian Physiotherapy Association; 1992:68.
13. Schiff W, Oldak R. Accuracy of judging time to arrival: effects of modality, trajectory, and gender. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990;16:303-316.
14. McLeod R, Ross H. Optic-flow and cognitive factors in time-to-collision estimates. Perception. 1981;12:417-423.
15. Rippol H, Fleurance P. What does keeping one's eye on the ball mean? Ergonomics. 1988;13:1647-1654.
16. Bootsma RJ, van Wieringen PCW. Timing an attacking forehand drive in table tennis. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990;16:21-29.
17. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics. 1973;14:201-211.
18. Runeson S, Frykholm G. Visual perception of lifted weight. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1981;7:733-740.
19. Bingham GP. Kinematic form and scaling: further investigations on the visual perception of lifted weight. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1987;13:155-177.
20. Scholz JP. Commentary on "Quantification of control: a preliminary study of effects of neurodevelopmental treatment on reaching in children with spastic cerebral palsy." Phys Ther. 1990;70:76-78.
21. Corcos DM. Strategies underlying the control of disordered movement. Phys Ther. 1991;71:25-38.
22. Jones RG, Donaldson IM, Parkin PJ. Impairment and recovers of ipsilateral sensory-motor function following unilateral cerebral infarction. Brain. 1989;112:113-132.
23. Fisk JD, Goodale MA. The effects of unilateral brain damage on visually guided reaching: hemispheric differences in the nature of the delicit. Exp Brain Res. 1988;72:425-435.
24. Broberg RA. Functional arm movement: the recovery of motor function following stroke. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Congress of the World Confederation for Physical Therapists, 1991, London, United Kingdom. London, England: The Chartered Society of Physiotherapy; 1991:1028-1030.
25. Wing AM, Lough S, Turton A, et al. Recovery of elbow function in voluntary positioning of the hand following hemiplegia due to stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990;53:126-134.
26. Trombly CA. Deficits of reaching in subjects with left hemiparesis: a pilot study. Am J Occup Ther. 1992;46:887-896.
27. Fetters L, Todd J. Quantitative assessment of infant reaching movements. Journal of Motor Behavior. 1987;19:147-166.
28. Lough S, Wing AM, Fraser C, Jenner JR. Measurement of recovery of function in the hemiplegic upper limb following stroke: a preliminary report. Human Movement Science. 1984;3:247-256.
29. Trombly CA. Observations of improvement of reaching in five subjects with left hemiparesis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993; 56:40-45.
30. Charlton JL. Motor control considerations for assessment and rehabilitation of movement disorders. In: Summers JJ, ed. Approaches to the Study of Motor Control and Learning. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers BV; 1992:441-467.
31. Kluzic J, Fetters L, Coryell J. Quantification of control: a preliminary study of effects of neurodevelopmental treatment on reaching in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 1990;70:65-76.
32. Chieffi S, Gentilucci A, Allport A, et al. Study of selective reaching and grasping in a patient with unilateral parietal lesion. Brain. 1993; 116:1119-1137.
33. Inzelberg R, Flash T, Schechtmau E, Korczyn A. Kinematic properties of upper limb trajectories in idiopathic torsion dystonia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995;58:312-319.
34. Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L, Lynne D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther. 1985;65: 175-180.
35. Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981;4:483-492.
36. Grant C. 3D Path Calculation Software. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: La Trobe University; 1992.
37. Jagacinski RJ, Reppenger DW, Moren MS, et al. Fitt's law and the microstructure of rapid discrete movements, J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1980;6:309-320.
38. Poulton EC. Bias in Quantifying Judgments. East Sussex, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd; 1989.
39. Maher C, Adams R. A psychopbysical evaluation of manual stiffness discrimination. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 1995;41:161-167.
40. Brown JF. The visual perception of velocity. In: Spigel IM, ed. Readings in the Study of Visually Perceived Movement. New York, NY: Harper & Row; 1965:64-107.
41. Spigel IM, ed. Readings in the Study of Visually Perceived Movement. New York, NY: Harper & Row; 1965.
42. Polgar S, Thomas S. Introduction to Research in the Health Sciences. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Liviugstone; 1988.
43. Altman D. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London, England: Capman and Hall; 1991.
44. Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Gordon J, et al. Movement Science: Foundations for Physical Therapy in Rehabilitation. Gaithersburg, Md: Aspen Publishers Inc; 1987.
45. Mulder T, Pauwels F, Nienhuis B. Motor recovery following stroke: towards a disability-orientated assessment of motor dysfunction. In: Harrison M, ed. Physiotherapy in Stroke Management. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone; 1995:275-282.
46. Sawner KA, La Vigne JM. Brunnström's Movement Therapy in Hemiplegia: A Neurophysiological Approach. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: JB Lippincott Co; 1992.