Lymphangiography combined with biopsy and computer tomography to detect lymph node metastases in localized prostate cancer

Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 116-119

  Rorvik J ^a,c   Halvorsen, O J ^a   Albrektsen, G ^b   Haukaas, S ^b  

^a HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^c HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Cancer; Lymph node; Prostate; Staging

Indexed keywords

IODINATED POPPYSEED OIL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; CANCER STAGING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FROZEN SECTION; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE BIOPSY; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; LYMPHANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEEDLE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY;

AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; LYMPHOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0031967635     PISSN: 00365599     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/003655998750014486     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Altman DG. Diagnostic tests. In: Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chaman and Hall, 1995: 409-411.
2. Bishoff JT, Reyes A, Thompson IM, et al. Pelvic lymphadenectomy can be omitted in selected patients with carcinoma of the prostate: development of a system of patient selection. Urology 1995; 45: 270-274.
3. Danella JF, DeKernion JB, Smith RB, Steckel J. The contemporary incidence of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer: implications for laparoscopic lymph node dissection. J Urol 1993; 149: 1488-1491.
4. De Antoni Crawford ED. Prostate cancer awareness week, education, service and research in a community setting. Cancer 1995; 75: 1874-1875.
5. Flanigan RC, Mohler JL, King CT, et al. Preoperative lymph node evaluation in prostatic cancer patients who are surgical candidates: the role of lymphangiography and computerized tomography scanning with direct fine needle aspiration. J Urol 1985; 134: 84-87.
6. Gervasi LA, Mata JE, Easley JD, et al. Prognostic significance of lymph nodal metastases in prostate cancer. J Urol 1989; 142: 332-336.
7. Goethlin JH. Post-lymphangiographic percutaneous fine needle biopsy of lymph nodes guided by fluoroscopy. Radiology 1976; 120: 205-207.
8. Goethlin JH, Hoeiem L. Percutaneous fine-needle biopsy of radiographically normal lymph nodes in the staging of prostatic carcinoma. Radiology 1981; 141: 351-354.
9. Goethlin J, Fuchs W A standardized scheme for the lymphographic diagnosis of malignant, metastatic spread. 3rd International Congress Eur Ass Radiol, 1973, Madrid.
10. Hermanek P, Sobin LH TNM classification of malignant tumours, 4th ed., 2nd rev., Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1992: 141-144.
11. Kidd R, Crane RD, Dail DH. Lymphangiography and fine-needle aspiration biopsy: ineffective for staging early prostate cancer. AJR 1984; 141: 1007-1012.
12. Kleer E, Larson-Keller Zincke H, Oesterling JE. Ability of preoperative serum prostate antigen value to predict pathologic stage and DNA ploidy: influence of clinical stage and tumour grade. Urology 1993; 41: 207-216.
13. Partin A, Yoo J, Carter HB, et al. The use of prostate specific antigen, clinical stage and Gleason score to predict pathologic stage in men with prostate cancer. J Urol 1993; 150: 110-114.
14. Paulson DF. The prognostic role of lymphadenectomy in adenocarcinoma of the prostate cancer, Urol Clin North Am 1980; 7: 615-622.
15. Petros JA, Catalona WJ. Lower incidence of unsuspected lymph node metastases in 521 consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 1992; 147: 1574-1575.
16. Prout GR, Heaney JA, Griffin PP, Daly JJ, Shipley WU. Nodal involvement as prognostic indicator in patients with prostatic carcinoma. J Urol 1980; 124: 226-231.
17. Oyen RH, Van Poppel HP, Ameye FE, et al. Lymph node staging of localized prostatic carcinoma with CT and CT-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: prospective study of 285 patients. Radiology 1994; 190: 315-322.
18. Mostofi FK, Sesterhenn IA, Sobin LH. Histologic typing of prostate tumours. In: International Histological Classification of Tumours, No. 22. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1980.
19. Rogers E, Gurpinar T, Dillioglugil MW, et al. The role of digital rectal examination, biopsy Gleason sum and prostate-specific antigen in selecting patients who require pelvic lymph node dissections for prostate cancer. Br J Urol 1996; 78: 419-425.
20. Stuart Wollf Jr J, Cher M, Dall'era M, et al. The use and accuracy of cross-sectional imaging and fine needle aspiration cytology for detection of lymph node metastases before radical prostatectomy. J Urol 1995; 7: 993-999.