Open lacrimal surgery: A comparison of admission outcome and complications after planned day case or inpatient management

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 82, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 392-396

  Hanna, Ivan T ^a   Powrie, Suzanne ^a   Rose, Geoffrey E ^a  

^a MOORFIELDS EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AMBULATORY SURGERY; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CELLULITIS; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; LACRIMAL APPARATUS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NOSE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0031966408     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.82.4.392     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. The Audit Commission. A short cut to better services - day surgery in England and Wales. London: HMSO, 1990:7.
2. Dresner SC, Klussman KG, Meyer DR Linberg JV. Outpatient dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmic Surg 1991;22: 222-4.
3. Benger R. Day-surgery external dacryocystorhinostomy. Aust NZ J Ophthalmol 1992;30:243-5.
4. Williams O, ed. New angles on day surgery. Anglia and Oxford Regional Health Authority and the NHS Executive, 1995:26.