Evaluation of peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: Comparison with single photon absorptiometry of the forearm and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine or femur

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 71, Issue APR., 1998, Pages 427-432

  Mole, P A ^a   McMurdo, M E T ^a   Paterson, C R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE MINERAL; CALCIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FEMUR NECK; FOREARM; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERFORMANCE; PHANTOM; PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY; SPINE;

EID: 0031966162     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.71.844.9659136     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Larcos G, Wahner HW. An evaluation of forearm bone mineral measurement with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Nucl Med 1991;32:2101-6.
2. Leboff MS, Fulheihan GE, Angell JE, et al. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: reproducibility and correlation with single-photon absorptiometry. J Bone Miner Res 1992;7:841-6.
3. Nelson D, Feingold M, Mascha E, Kleerekoper M. Comparison of single-photon and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the radius. Bone Miner 1992;18:77-83.
4. Nieves JW, Cosman F, Mars C, Lindsay R. Comparative assessment of bone mineral density of the forearm using single photon and dual X-ray absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int 1992;51:352-5.
5. Dequeker J. Quantitative assessment of osteoporosis. In: Beneken JEW, Thévenin V, editors. Advances in biomedical engineering. Burke, VA, USA: IOS Press, 1993:132-51.
6. Paterson CR, Mole PA. Bone density in osteogenesis imperfecta may well be normal. Postgrad Med J 1994;70:104-7.
7. Pearson J, Dequeker J, Henley M, Bright J, Reeve J, Kalender W, et al. European semi-anthropomorphic spine phantom for the calibration of bone densitometers: assessment of precision, stability and accuracy. Osteoporosis Int 1995;5:174-84.
8. Rae MR, Mole PA, Paterson CR. Endogenous factors affecting bone mineral content in post-menopausal women. Maturitas 1991;13:319-24.
9. Petley GW, Cotton AM, Murrills AJ, Taylor PA, Cooper C, Cawley MID, et al. Reference ranges of bone mineral density for women in southern England: the impact of local data on the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Br J Radiol 1996;69:655-60.
10. World Health Organisation. Assessment of fracture risk and its application for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Technical report series, number 843. Geneva: WHO, 1994:95-6.
11. Kelly TL, Crane G, Baran DT. Single X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: precision, correlation, and reference data. Calcif Tissue Int 1994;54:212-8.
12. Johnston CC, Slemenda CW. Identification of patients with low bone mass by single photon absorptiometry and single-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Am J Med 1995;98:2A-37S.