Diallel analysis of bacterial wilt resistance in tomato derived from different sources

Plant Disease

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 74-78

  Hanson, Peter M ^a   Licardo, Olivia ^b   Hanudin, ^c   Wang, Jaw Fen ^a   Chen, Jen Tzu ^a  

^a AVRDC THE WORLD VEGETABLE CENTER   (Taiwan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES   (Philippines)

^c Segunung Hort Research Station   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; RALSTONIA SOLANACEARUM;

EID: 0031963982     PISSN: 01912917     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.1.74     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Acosta, J. C., Gilbert, J. C., and Quinon, V. L. 1964. Heritability of bacterial wilt resistance in tomato. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 84:455-462.
2. Bosch, S. E., Louw, A. J., and Aucamp, E. 1985. 'Rodade' bacterial wilt resistant tomato. HortScience 20:458-459.
3. Christie, B. R., and Shattuck, V. I. 1992. The diallel cross: Design, analysis, and use for plant breeders. Pages 9-36 in: Plant Breeding Reviews, vol. 9. J. Janick, ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
4. Danesh, D., Aarons, S., McGill, G. E., and Young, N. D. 1994. Genetic dissection of oligogenic resistance to bacterial wilt in tomato. Mol. Plant-Microbe .Interact. 7:464-471.
5. Elphihstone, J. G. 1994. Virulence of isolates of Pseudomonas solanacearum from worldwide sources on resistant and susceptible tomato cultivars. Pages 599-604 in: Proc, int. Conf. Plant.Pathog. Bact., 8th. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris.
6. Falconer, D. S. 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 3rd ed. Longman Scientific and Technical, Hong Kong. pp. 275-277.
7. Gilbert, J. C., Tanaka, J. S., and Takeda, K. Y. 1973. 'Kewalo' tomato. HortScieriee 9:481-482.
8. González, W. G., and Summers, W. L. 1995. A comparison of Pseudomonas solanacearum-resistant tomato cultivars as hybrid parents. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 120:891-895.
9. Griffmg, B. 1956. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 9:463-493.
10. Grimault, V., Prior, P., and Anais, G. 1995. A monogenic dominant resistance of tomato to bacterial wilt in Hawaii 7996 is associated with plant colonization by Pseudomonas solanacearum. J. Phytopathol. 143:349-352.
11. Hanson, P. M., Wang, J. F., Licardo, O., Hanudin, Mah, S. Y., Hartman, G. L., Lin, Y. C., and Chen, J. T. 1996. Variable reaction of tomato lines to bacterial wilt evaluated at several locations in Southeast Asia. HortScience 31:143-146.
12. Hayward, A. C. 1991, Biology and epidemiology of bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 29:65-87.
13. Henderson, W. R., and Jenkins, S. F., Jr. 1972. 'Venus' and 'Saturn' tomato varieties resistant to southern bacterial wilt. HortScience 7:346.
14. Jaworski, C. A., Phatak, S. C., Gate, S. R., Gitaitis, R. D., and Widrlechner, M. P. 1987. GA 1565-2-4, GA 219-1-2 BWT, GA 1095-1-4 BWT, and GA 1405-1-2 BWT bacterial wilt-tolerant tomato. HortScience 22:324-325.
15. Kado, C. I., and Heskett, M. G. 1970. Selective media for isolation of Agrobacterium, Corynebacterium, Erwinia, Pseudomonas, and Xanthomonas. Phytopathology 60:969-976.
16. Kelman, A. 1954. The relationship of pathogenicity in Pseudomonas solanacearum to colony appearance on a tetrazolium medium. Phytopathology 44:693-695.
17. Prior, P., Grimault, V.,_and Schmit, J. 1994. Resistance to bacterial wilt (Pseudomonas solanacearum) in tomato: Present status and prospects. Pages 209-223 in: Bacterial Wilt: The Disease and its Causative Agent Pseudomonas solanacearum. A. G. Hayward and G. L. Hartman, eds. GAB International,Wallingford, England.
18. Prior, P., Steva, H., and Cadet, P. 1990. Aggressiveness of strains of Pseudomonas solanacearum from the French West Indies (Martinique and Guadeloupe) on tomato. Plant Dis. 74:962-965.
19. Scott, J. W., Somodi, G. C., and Jones, J. B. 1988. Bacterial spot resistance is not associated with bacterial wilt resistance in tomato. Proc. Fla. State Hortic. Soc. 101:390-392.
20. Scott, J. W., Somodi, G. C., and Jones, J. B. 1993. Testing tomato genotypes and breeding for resistance to bacterial wilt in Florida. Pages 126-131 in: Bacterial Wilt. G. L. Hartman and A. C. Hayward, eds. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra.
21. Singh, D. 1973. Diallel analysis for combining ability over several environments. II. Indian J. Plant Breed. Genet. 33:469-481.
22. Singh, K. 1961. Inheritance of North Carolina type of bacterial wilt resistance in tomato, Lycopersiam exculentum. M.S. thesis, University of Hawaii, Honolulu.
23. Sonoda, R. M., and Augustine, J. 1978. Reaction of bacterial wilt-resistant tomato lines to Pseudomonas solanacearum in Florida. Plant Dis. Rep. 62:464-466.
24. Steel, R. G. D., and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York. pp. 102-104.
25. Thoquet, P., Olivier, J., Sperisen, C., Rogowsky, P., Laterrot, H., and Grimsley, N. 1996. Quantitative trait loci determining resistance to bacterial wilt in the tomato cultivar Hawaii 7996. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 9:826-836.
26. Thoquet, P., Olivier, J., Sperisen, C., Rogowsky, P., Prior, P., Anaïs, G., Mangin, B., Bazin, B., Nazer, R., and Grimsley, N. 1996. Polygenic resistance of tomato plants to bacterial wilt in the French West Indies. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 9:837-842.
27. Wang, J. F., Hanson, P. M., and Barnes, J. A. 1996. Preliminary results of worldwide evaluation of international set of resistance sources to bacterial wilt in tomatoes. Bact. Wilt Newsl. 13:8-10.