Automated measurement of motor activity in human subjects: Effects of repeated testing and d-amphetamine

Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 59-65

  Greenwald, Mark K ^a   Schuster, Charles R ^a   Johanson, Chris Ellyn ^a   Jewell, Jennifer ^a  

^a NIDA Addiction Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Amphetamine; Central nervous system stimulants; Drug abuse; Exploratory behavior; Habituation; Humans; Motor activity; Time factors

Indexed keywords

AMPHETAMINE; BENZODIAZEPINE; CENTRAL STIMULANT AGENT; DIAZEPAM; TRIPELENNAMINE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM FUNCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DOSE RESPONSE; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG ABUSE; DRUG EFFECT; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HUMAN; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MOTOR ACTIVITY; ORAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUTOMATION; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS; DEXTROAMPHETAMINE; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0031963071     PISSN: 00913057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0091-3057(97)00387-0     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Cichetti D. V. Extension of multiple-range tests to interaction tables in the analysis of variance. A rapid approximate solution Psychol. Bull. 77:1972;405-408.
2. Deminiere J. M., Piazza P. V., Le Moal M., Simon H. Experimental approach to individual vulnerability to psychostimulant addiction. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 13:1989;141-147.
3. de Wit H., Uhlenhuth E. H., Johanson C. E. Individual differences in the reinforcing and subjective effects of amphetamine and diazepam. Drug Alcohol Depend. 16:1986;341-460.
4. Geyer, M. A.: Approaches to the characterization of drug effects on locomotor activity in rodents. In: Modern methods of pharmacology, vol. 6, Testing and evaluation of drugs of abuse. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1990:81-99.
5. Geyer M. A., Paulus M. P. Multivariate and nonlinear approaches to characterizing drug effects on the locomotor and investigatory behavior of rats. Frascella J., Brown R. M. Neurobiological approaches to brain-behavior interaction, NIDA research monograph 124. 1992;203-233 U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
6. Ghoneim M. M., Mewaldt S. P., Hinrichs J. V. Dose-response analysis of the behavioral effects of diazepam. II Psychomotor performance, cognition and mood. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 82:1984;296-300.
7. Grau C., Escera C., Cilveti R., Garcia M., Mojon A., Fernandez J. R., Hermida R. Ultradian rhythms in gross motor activity of adult humans. Physiol. Behav. 57:1995;411-419.
8. Hienz R. D., Turkkan J. S., Spear D. J., Sannerud C. A., Kaminski B. J., Allen R. P. General activity in baboons measured with a computerized, lightweight piezoelectric motion sensor. Effects of drugs Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 42:1992;497-507.
9. Holtzman S. G., Young C. W. Motor activity of squirrel monkeys measured with an ultrasonic motion sensor. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 38:1991;633-637.
10. Hooks M. S., Jones G. H., Smith A. D., Neill D. B., Justice J. B. Jr. Individual differences in locomotor activity and sensitization. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 38:1991;467-470.
11. Hooks M. S., Jones G. H., Smith A. D., Neill D. B., Justice J. B. Jr. Response to novelty predicts the locomotor and nucleus accumbens dopamine response to cocaine. Synapse. 9:1991;121-128.
12. Jackson D. M., Johansson C., Lindgren L. M., Bengtsson A. Dopamine receptor antagonists block amphetamine and phencyclidine-induced motor stimulation in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 48:1994;465-471.
13. Johanson C. E., Evans S., Henningfield J. The discriminative stimulus effects of tripelennamine in humans. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 126:1996;140-146.
14. Johanson C. E., Uhlenhuth E. H. Drug preference and mood in humans. d-Amphetamine Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 71:1980;275-280.
15. Johanson C. E., Uhlenhuth E. H. Drug preference and mood in humans. Diazepam Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 71:1980;269-273.
16. Kelly P. H., Seviour P. W., Iversen S. D. Amphetamine and apomorphine responses in the rat following 6-OHDA lesions of the nucleus accumbens septi and corpus striatum. Brain Res. 94:1975;507-522.
17. Keppel G. Design and analysis. A researcher's handbook 2:1982;Prentice Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
18. Kleitman N. Basic rest-activity cycle - 22 years later. Sleep. 5:1982;311-317.
19. Kripke D. F., Wyborney V. G., Mullaney D. J., Messin S., Atkinson M. No basic rest-activity cycle in the wrist. Sleep Res. 6:1977;218.
20. Linnoila M., Erwin C. W., Brendle A., Simpson D. Psychomotor effects of diazepam in anxious patients and healthy volunteers. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 3:1983;88-96.
21. Loke W. H., Hinrichs J. V., Ghoneim M. M. Caffeine and diazepam. Separate and combined effects on mood, memory and psychomotor performance Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 87:1985;344-350.
22. Mattila M., Seppala T., Mattila M. J. Combined effects of buspirone and diazepam on objective and subjective tests of performance in healthy volunteers. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 40:1986;620-626.
23. Mazurski E. J., Beninger R. J. Stimulant effects of apomorphine and (+)-amphetamine in rats with varied habituation to test environment. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 29:1988;249-255.
24. Mead L. A., Hargreaves E.L., Ossenkopp K. P., Kavaliers M. A multivariate assessment of spontaneous locomotor activity in the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus Influences of age and sex. Physiol. Behav. 57:1995;893-899.
25. Moss H. B., Blackson T. C., Martin C. S., Tarter R. E. Heightened motor activity level in male offspring of substance abusing fathers. Biol. Psychiatry. 32:1992;1135-1147.
26. Okudaira N., Kripke D. F., Webster J. B. No basic rest-activity cycle in the head, wrist or ankle. Physiol. Behav. 32:1984;843-845.
27. Ossenkopp K. P., Macrae L. K., Teskey G. C. Automated multivariate measurement of spontaneous motor activity in mice. Time course and reliabilities of the behavioral measures Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 27:1987;565-568.
28. Ossenkopp K. P., Mazmanian D. S. The measurement and integration of behavioral variables. Aggregation and complexity as important issues Neurobehav. Toxicol. Teratol. 7:1985;95-100.
29. Ott D. A., Mandel R. J. Amphetamine sensitivity in open-field activity vs. the prepulse inhibition paradigm. Brain Res. Bull. 37:1995;219-222.
30. Piazza P. V., Deminiere J. M., Le Moal M., Simon H. Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science. 245:1989;1511-1513.
31. Reiter L. W., MacPhail R. C. Motor activity. A survey of methods with potential use in toxicity testing In. Geller, I.; Stebbins, W. C.; Wayner, M. J., eds. Test methods for definition of effects of toxic substances on behavior and neuromotor function, vol. 1(Suppl. 1):1979;53-66. Ankho International Inc.;
32. Robbins T. W. A critique of the methods available for the measurement of spontaneous motor activity. Iversen L. L., Iversen S. D. Handbook of psychopharmacology, vol. 7. 1977;37-82 Plenum Press, New York.
33. Robbins T. W., Iversen S. D. A dissociation of the effects of d-amphetamine on locomotor activity and exploration in rats. Psychopharmacologia. 28:1973;155-164.
34. Sanberg P. R., Hagenmeyer S. H., Henault M. A. Automated measurement of multivariate locomotor behavior in rodents. Neurobehav. Toxicol. Teratol. 7:1985;87-94.
35. Sanberg P. R., Zoloty S. A., Willis R., Ticarich C. D., Rhoads K., Nagy R. P., Mitchell S. G., Laforest A. R., Jenks J. A., Harkabus L. J., Gurson D. B., Finnefrock J. A., Bednarik E. J. Digiscan activity. Automated measurement of thigmotactic and stereotactic behavior in rats Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 27:1987;569-572.
36. Schiorring E. An open field study of stereotyped locomotor activity in amphetamine treated rats. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 66:1979;281-287.
37. Smith C. B. Effects of d-amphetamine upon operant behavior of pigeons. Enhancement by reserpine J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 146:1964;167-174.
38. Smith R. C., Davis J. M. Comparative effects of d-amphetamine, l-amphetamine and methylphenidate on mood in man. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 53:1977;1-12.
39. Stern K. N., Chait L. D., Johanson C. E. Reinforcing and subjective effects of oral tripelennamine in normal human volunteers. Behav. Pharmacol. 1:1989;161-167.
40. Ukai M., Kobayashi T., Kameyama T. Effects of several amnesic drugs on the habituation of exploratory activity in mice as indexed by horizontal and vertical activities. Gen. Pharmacol. 25:1994;179-185.
41. Wise R. A., Bozarth M. A. A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction. Psychol. Rev. 94:1987;469-492.