Epidemiology of repeat ectopic pregnancy: A population-based prospective cohort study

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 91, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 129-135

  Skjeldestad, Finn Egil ^a   Hadgu, A ^b   Eriksson, N ^b  

^a TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PARITY; PATHOGENESIS; PELVIC INFLAMMATORY DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECURRENCE RISK; RECURRENT DISEASE; RISK FACTOR; SALPINGECTOMY; UTERINE TUBE OCCLUSION;

EID: 0031962683     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00603-0     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. 1. Sherman D, Langer R, Sadovsky G, Bukovsky I, Caspi E. Improved fertility following ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 1982;37:497-502.
2. 2. Pouly JL, Mahnes H, Mage G, Canis M, Bruhat MA. Conservative laparoscopic treatment of 321 ectopic pregnancies. Fertil Steril 1986;46:1093-7.
3. 3. DeCherney AH, Diamond MP. Laparoscopic salpingostomy for ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1987;70:948-50.
4. 4. Thorburn J, Philipson M, Lindblom B. Fertility after ectopic pregnancy in relation to background factors and surgical treatment. Fertil Steril 1988;49:595-601.
5. 5. Tuomivaara L, Kauppila A. Radical or conservative surgery for ectopic pregnancy? A follow-up study of fertility of 323 patients. Fertil Steril 1988;50:580-3.
6. 6. Mäkinen JI, Salmi TA, Nikkanen VPJ. Encouraging rates of fertility after ectopic pregnancy. Int J Fertil 1989;34:46-51.
7. 7. Langer R, Golan A, Raziel A, Bukovsky I, Ron-El R, Caspi E. Reproductive outcome after conservative surgery for unruptured tubal pregnancy - A 15-year experience. Fertil Steril 1990;53:227-31.
8. 8. Tulandi T, Guralnick M. Treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy by salpingotomy with or without tubal suturing and salpingectomy. Fertil Steril 1991;55:53-5.
9. 9. Lundorf P, Thorburn J, Lindblom B. Fertility outcome after conservative surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy evaluated in a randomized trial. Fertil Steril 1992;57:998-1002.
10. 10. Silva P, Schaper AM, Rooney B. Reproductive outcome after 143 laparoscopic procedures for ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1993;81:710-5.
11. 11. Langebrekke A, Sörnes T, Urnes A. Fertility outcome after treatment of tubal pregnancy by laparoscopic laser surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1993;72:547-9.
12. 12. Oelsner G, Goldenberg M, Admon D, Pansky M, Tur-Kaspa I, Rabinovitch O, et al. Salpingectomy by operative laparoscopy and subsequent reproductive performance. Hum Reprod 1994;9:83-6.
13. 13. Gruft L, Bertola E, Luchinic L, Azzilonna C, Bigatti G, Parazzini F. Determinants of reproductive prognosis after ectopic pregnancy. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1333-6.
14. 14. Skjeldestad FE, Kendrick JS, Atrash HK, Daltveit AK. Increasing incidence of ectopic pregnancy in one Norwegian county - A population based study, 1970-1993. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997;76:159-65.
15. 15. Menken J, Trussel J, Larsen U. Age and infertility. Science 1986; 233:1389-95.
16. 16. Mäkinen JI. Increase of ectopic pregnancy in Finland - Combination of time and cohort effects. Obstet Gynecol 1989;73: 21-4.
17. 17. Chow W-H, Daling JR, Cates W Jr, Greenberg RS. Epidemiology of ectopic pregnancy. Epidemiol Rev 1987;9:70-94.
18. 18. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Morgenstern H. Epidemiologic research: Principles and quantitative methods. Belmont, California: Lifetime Learning Press, 1982.
19. 19. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analyses using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986;73:13-22.
20. 20. Zeger SL, Liang KY. Longitudinal data analyses for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics 1986;42:121-30.
21. 21. Wölner-Hansen P. Silent pelvic inflammatory disease: Is it overstated? Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:321-5.
22. 22. Sandvei R, Ulstein M, Wollen AL. Fertility following ectopic pregnancy with special reference to previous use of an intrauterine device (IUCD). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1987;66:131-5.
23. 23. Skjeldestad FE. Choice of contraceptive modality by women in Norway. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994;73:48-52.
24. 24. Wollen AL, Flood PR, Sandvei R. Altered ciliary substructure in the endosalpinx in women using an IUCD. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1990;69:307-12.
25. 25. Sandvei R, Wollen AL, Flood PR, Anker C. Mast cells in the tubal wall in women using an intrauterine contraceptive device. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1986;93:758-64.
26. 26. World Health Organization. A multi center case-control study of ectopic pregnancy. Clin Reprod Fertil 1985;3:131-43.
27. 27. Marchbanks PA, Annegers JF, Coulma CB, Strath JH, Kurland LT. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy. A population-based study. JAMA 1988;259:1823-7.
28. 28. Skjeldestad FE. Conception rates post IUD removal. In: Bardin CW, Mishell DR, eds. Proceedings from the Fourth International Conference on IUDs. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1994.
29. 29. Wilson J. A prospective New Zealand study of fertility after removal of copper intrauterine contraceptive devices for conception and because of complications: A four year study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:391-6.
30. 30. Skjeldestad FE, Hammervold R, Peterson DR. Outcomes of pregnancy with IUD in situ - A population-based case-control study. Adv Contracept 1988;4:265-70.
31. 31. Sivin I. Dose- and age-dependent ectopic pregnancy risks with intrauterine contraception. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:291-8.
32. 32. Rossing MA, Daling JR, Voigt LF, Stergachis AS, Weiss NS. Current use of an intrauterine device and risk of tubal pregnancy. Epidemiology 1993;4:252-8.
33. 33. Skjeldestad FE. How effectively do copper intrauterine devices prevent ectopic pregnancy? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997;76: 684-90.