Learning in host selection in Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 227-234

  Cunningham, J Paul ^a   Jallow, Mustapha F A ^a   Wright, Denis J ^a   Zalucki, Myron P ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HOST SELECTION; LEARNING; MOTH;

HELICOVERPA ARMIGERA; LEPIDOPTERA; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; NICOTIANA TABACUM; NOCTUIDAE;

EID: 0031959970     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0600     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Courtney S. P., Chen G. K., Gardner A. A general model for individual host selection. Oikos. 55:1989;55-65.
2. Crawley M. J. GLIM for Ecologists. 1993;Blackwell Scientific Publications, London.
3. Cunningham, J. P. 1996, Studies on feeding and ovi-position behaviour in Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Imperial College of Science and Technology, London.
4. Firempong S., Zalucki M. P. Host plant selection byHelicoverpa armigera. Austral. J. Zool. 37:1990;675-683.
5. Firempong S., Zalucki M. P. Host plant selection byHelicoverpa armigera. Austral. J. Zool. 39:1991;343-350.
6. Fitt G. P. The ecology ofHeliothis. A. Rev. Entomol. 34:1989;17-52.
7. Fitt G. P., Boyan G. S. Methods of studying behaviour. Heliothis: Research Methods and Prospects. 1991;Springer-Verlag, London. p. 122-156.
8. Hammer M. An identified neuron mediates the unconditioned stimulus in associative olfactory learning in honeybees. Science. 366:1993;59-64.
9. Herre E. A. Optimality, plasticity, and selective regimes in fig wasp sex ratios. Nature, Lond. 329:1987;627-629.
10. Jallow M. F. A., Zalucki M. P. A technique for measuring intra-specific variation in oviposition preference ofHeliothis armigera. J. Austral. Entomol. Soc. 34:1995;281-288.
11. Jermy T., Hansen F. E., Dethier V. G. Induction of specific food preference in Lepidopterous larvae. Entomol. exp. appl. 11:1968;211-230.
12. Papaj D. R. Conditioning of leaf-shape discrimination by chemical cues in the butterfly,Battus philenor. Anim. Behav. 34:1986a;1281-1288.
13. Papaj D. R. Interpopulation differences in host preference and the evolution of learning in the butterflyBattus philenor. Evolution. 40:1986b;518-530.
14. Papaj D. R. Shifts in foraging behaviour by aBattus philenor. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19:1986c;31-39.
15. Papaj D. R., Prokopy R. J. Ecological and evolutionary aspects of learning in phytophagous insects. A. Rev. Entomol. 34:1989;315-350.
16. Papaj D. R., Rausher M. D. Genetic differences and phenotype plasticity as causes of variation in oviposition preference inBattus philenor. Oecologia (Berl.). 74:1987;24-30.
17. Parmesan C., Singer M. C., Harris I. Absence of adaptive learning from the oviposition foraging behaviour of a checkerspot butterfly. Anim. Behav. 50:1995;161-175.
18. Ramaswarmy S. B. Host finding by moths: sensory modalities and behaviours. J. Insect Physiol. 34:1988;235-249.
19. Rausher M. D. Ecology of host-selection behaviour in phytophagous insects. Denno R. F., McClure M. S. Variable Plants and Herbivores in Natural and Managed Systems. 1983;223-257 Academic Press, New York.
20. Reed W., Pawar C. S. Heliothis: a global problem. Reed W., Kumble V. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Heliothis Management. 1982;9-14 International Centre for Research in the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patacheru.
21. Renwick J. A. A., Chew F. S. Oviposition behaviour in Lepidoptera. A. Rev. Entomol. 39:1994;377-400.
22. Singer M. C. Quantification of host preference by manipulation of oviposition behaviour in the butterflyEuphydryas editha. Oecologia (Berl.). 52:1982;224-229.
23. Smith B. H. Merging mechanism and adaptation: an ethological approach to learning and generaliz-ation. Papaj D. R., Lewis A. C. Insect Learning: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives. 1993;126-157 Chapman & Hall, London.
24. Stanton M. L. Short-term learning and the searching accuracy of egg laying butterflies. Anim. Behav. 32:1984;33-40.
25. Stephens D. W. Learning and behavioral ecology: incomplete information and environmental predictability. Papaj D. R., Lewis A. C. Insect Learning: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives. 1993;195-218 Chapman & Hall, New York.
26. Stephens D. W., Krebs J. R. Foraging Theory. 1986;Princeton University Press, Princeton.
27. Szentesi A., Jermy T. The role of experience in host plant choice by phytophagous insects. Bernays E. A. Insect Plant Interactions. Vol. VII. 1990;39-74 CRC Press, Boca Raton.
28. Teakle R. E. Laboratory Culture of Heliothis spp. and Methods and Prospects. 1991;Springer-Verlag, New York.
29. Thompson J. N., Pellmyr O. Evolution of oviposition behaviour and host preference in Lepidoptera. A. Rev. Entomol. 65:1991;65-89.
30. Traynier R. M. M. Associative learning in the oviposition behaviour of the cabbage butterfly,Pieris rapae. Physiol. Entomol. 9:1984;465-472.
31. Traynier R. M. M. Visual learning in assays of sinigrin solution as an oviposition releaser for the cabbage butterfly,Pieris rapae. Entomol. exp. appl. 40:1986;25-33.
32. Twine P. H. Cannibalistic behaviour ofH. armigera. Qd agric. J. 99:1971;520-522.
33. Yamamoto R. T., Jenkins R. Y., McClusky R. K. Factors determining the selection of plants foroviposition by the tobacco hornwormManduca sexta. Entomol. exp. appl. 12:1969;504-508.
34. Zalucki M. P., Daglish G., Firempong S., Twine P. The biology and ecology ofHeliothis armigeraH. punctigera. Austral. J. Zool. 34:1986;779-814.
35. Zalucki M. P., Murray D. A. H., Gregg P. C., Fitt G. P., Twine P. H., Jones C. Ecology ofHelicoverpa armigeraH. punctigera. Austral. J. Zool. 42:1994;329-346.