A cladistic analysis of Iris series Californicae based on morphological data

Systematic Botany

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 73-88

  Wilson, Carol A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLADISTIC ANALYSIS; HYBRID; PARSIMONY;

IRIS COLUMBIANA; IRIS HARTWEGII; IRIS PURDYI; IRIS TENAX; IRIS THOMPSONII;

EID: 0031959336     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2419575     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. CARTER, L. C. and B. G. BREHM. 1969. Chemical and morphological analysis of introgressive hybridization between Iris tenax and I. chrysophylla. Brittonia 21: 44-54.
2. CLARKSON, Q. D. 1959. Field studies of natural hybridization in the Oregon species of Iris L. subsection Californicae Diels. Madroño 15: 115-122.
3. _ and D. I. THOMPSON. 1961. Analysis of a hybrid Iris near Elmira, Lane County, Oregon. Northwest Science 35: 27-31.
4. DYKES, W. R. 1913. The genus Iris. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
5. FARRIS, J. S. 1989. The retention index and homoplasy excess. Systematic Zoology 38: 406-407.
6. FOSTER, R. C. 1937. A cyto-taxonomic survey of the North American species of Iris. Contributions From the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University 119: 1-82.
7. FUNK, V. A. 1985. Phylogenetic patterns and hybridization. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 72: 681-715.
8. KLUGE, A. G. and J. S. FARRIS. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Systematic Zoology 18: 1-32.
9. LENZ, L. W. 1958. A revision of the Pacific Coast Irises. Aliso 4: 1-72.
10. _. 1959. Hybridization and speciation in the Pacific Coast Irises. Aliso 4: 1-72.
11. MADDISON, W. P. and D. R. MADDISON. 1992. MacClade: interactive analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
12. MCDADE, L. 1990. Hybrids and phylogenetic systematics. I. Patterns of character expression in hybrids and their implications for cladistic analysis. Evolution 44: 1685-1700.
13. SANDERSON, M. J. and M. J. DONOGHUE. 1989. Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy. Evolution 43: 1781-1795.
14. SIMONET, M. 1934. Nouvelles recherches cytologiques et génétiques chez les Iris. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Botanique 16: 229-383.
15. SMITH, F. H. and Q. D. CLARKSON. 1956. Cytological studies of interspecific hybridization in Iris, subsection Californicae. American Journal of Botany 43: 582-588.
16. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1991. PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.0s. Champaign: Illinois Natural History Survey.
17. THE SPECIES GROUP OF THE BRITISH IRIS SOCIETY (ed). 1997. A guide to species Irises their identification and cultivation. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
18. WEBERLING, F. 1989. Morphology of flowers and inflorescences. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
19. WILSON, C. A., A. LEVINSON, and R. PETERSEN. 1990. An investigation into the status of Iris thompsonii (Iridaceae). Madroño 37: 113-123.
20. YOUNG, N. D. 1994. Pacific coast Iris speciation, hybridization and phylogeny: molecular systematics, morphological species distinctions and causes of genetic isolation. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
21. _. 1996. Concordance and discordance: a tale of two hybrid zones in the Pacific Coast irises (Iridaceae). American Journal of Botany 83: 1623-1629.