Taxonomic status of Quercus acerifolia (Fagaceae) and a morphological comparison of four members of the Quercus shumardii complex

Systematic Botany

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 89-100

  Hess, William J ^a   Stoynoff, Nick A ^b  

^a MORTON ARBORETUM   (United States)

^b Science Department   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

QUERCUS ACERIFOLIA;

EID: 0031957652     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2419576     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. CAMUS, A. 1934-1954. Les Chênes. Monographie du gene Quercus. Paris: Academie des Sciences.
2. GUTTMAN, S. I. and L. A. WEIGT. 1989. Electrophoretic evidence of relationships among Quercus (oaks) of eastern North America. Canadian Journal of Botany 67: 339-351.
3. HARDIN, J. W. 1975. Hybridization and introgression in Quercus alba. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 56: 336-363.
4. HESS, W. J. and N. A. STOYNOFF. 1989. The natural history of Quercus shumardii Buckley var. acerifolia Palmer (= Quercus acerifolia (Palmer) Stoynoff & Hess stat. nov.). Unpublished report for the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, District of Columbia: The Morton Arboretum.
5. HOKANSON, S. C., J. G. ISEBRANDS, R. J. JENSEN, and J. F. HANCOCK. 1993. Isozyme variation in oaks of the Apostle Islands in Wisconsin: genetic structure and levels of inbreeding in Quercus rubra and Q. ellipsoidalis (Fagaceae). American Journal of Botany 80: 1349-1357.
6. HOLMGREN, P. K., N. H. HOLMGREN, and L. C. BARNETT. 1990. Index Herbariorum. I ed. 7. Regnum Vegetabile 120.
7. JANDEL SCIENTIFIC. 1988. Sigma-Scan: The scientific measurement program. Version 3.90. Corte Madera, California.
8. JENSEN, R. J. 1975. A numerical taxonomic study of hybridization in selected populations of Quercus subgenus Erythrobalanus. Ph. D. dissertation, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio.
9. _. 1977a. Numerical analysis of the scarlet oak complex (Quercus subgen. Erythrobalanus) in the Eastern United States: Relationships above the species level. Systematic Botany 2: 122-133.
10. _. 1977b. A preliminary numerical analysis of the red oak complex in Michigan and Wisconsin. Taxon 26: 399-407.
11. _. 1983. A practical view of numerical taxonomy or should I be a pheneticist or a cladist. Pp. 55-71 in Numerical taxonomy, ed. J. Felsenstein. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
12. _ and W. H. ESHBAUGH. 1976a. Numerical taxonomic studies of hybridization in Quercus. I. Populations of restricted areal distribution and low taxonomic diversity. Systematic Botany 1: 1-10.
13. _ and _. 1976b. Numerical taxonomic studies of hybridization in Quercus. II. Populations with wide areal distributions and high taxonomic diversity. Systematic Botany 1: 10-19.
14. _, S.C. HOKANSON, J. G. ISEBRANDS, and J. F. HANCOCK. 1993. Morphometric variation in oaks of the Apostle Islands in Wisconsin: evidence of hybridization between Quercus rubra and Q. ellipsoidalis (Fagaceae). American Journal of Botany 80:1358-1366.
15. JOHNSON, G. P. 1992. Noteworthy collections: Arkansas. Castanea 57: 150-151.
16. KNOPS, J. F. and R. J. JENSEN. 1980. Morphological and phenolic variation in a three species community of red oaks. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 107: 418-428.
17. LAUGHLIN, K. 1969. Quercus shumardii var. stenocarpa Laughlin, Stenocarp Shumard Oak. Phytologia 19: 57-64.
18. LI, H. and J. HSIAO. 1973. A preliminary study of the chemosystematics of American oaks: phenolic characters of leaves. Bartonia 42: 5-13.
19. LITTLE, E. L. 1971. Atlas of United States trees, vol. 1. Conifers and important hardwoods. Miscellaneous Publications. 1146, Washington, District of Columbia: United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
20. MANOS, P. S. and D. E. FAIRBROTHERS. 1987. Allozyme variation in populations of six northeastern American red oaks (Fagaceae: Quercus subg. Erythrobalanus). Systematic Botany 12: 365-373.
21. MCDOUGAL, K. M. 1984. Elevational variation in foliar flavonoids of Quercus rubra L. (Fagaceae). American Journal of Botany 71: 301-308.
22. PALMER, E. J. 1942. The red oak complex in the United States. American Midland Naturalist 27: 732-740.
23. SCHNABEL, A. and J. L. HAMRICK. 1990. Comparative analysis of population genetic structure in Quercus macrocarpa and Q. gambelii (Fagaceae). Systematic Botany 15: 240-251.
24. SMITH, E. B. 1994. Keys to the flora of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas: Univ. of Arkansas Press.
25. SOLOMON, A. M. 1983. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy of red oaks in eastern North America. American Journal of Botany 70: 495-507.
26. STATSOFT. 1992. CSS:STATISTICA, release 3.1. Vol. 1-3. Tulsa, Oklahoma: StatSoft Incorp.
27. STEYERMARK, J. A. 1963. Flora of Missouri. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State Univ. Press.
28. STOYNOFF, N. A. and W. J. HESS. 1990. A new status for Quercus shumardii var. acerifolia (Fagaceae). Sida 14: 267-271.
29. TRELEASE, W. 1924. The American oaks. Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences 20: 1-155.
30. TUCKER, J. M. 1961. Studies in the Quercus undulata complex. I. A preliminary statement. American Journal of Botany 48: 202-208.
31. _. 1963. Studies in the Quercus undulata complex. III. The contributions of Q. arizonica. American Journal of Botany 50: 699-708.
32. _ and H. S. HASKELL. 1960. Quercus dunnii and Q. chrysolepis in Arizona. Brittonia 12: 196-219.
33. WILKINSON, L. 1990a. SYSTAT: The system for statistics. Evanston, Illinois: Systat.
34. _. 1990b. SYGRAPH: The system for graphics. Evanston, Illinois: Systat.