Steady-state PVECP is superior to transient PVECP in the diagnosis of optic neuritis

Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 230-233

  Takasoh, Michihiko ^a   Adachi Usami, Emiko ^a   Mizota, Atsushi ^a  

^a CHIBA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Optic neuritis; Steady state VECP; Transient VECP

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCHOOL CHILD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0031955429     PISSN: 13953907     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.1998.760221.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Adachi-Usami E (1981): Human visual system modulation transfer function measured by evoked potentials. Neurosci Lett 23: 43-47.
2. Adachi-Usami E & Morita Y (1979): Temporal contrast sensitivity characteristics of human vision as obtained by VECPs to checkerboad stimuli. In Tazawa Y: ed. Proc. XVIth International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision Symp. Morioka,: 249-257.
3. Bobak P, Friedman R, Brigell M, Goodwin J & Anderson R (1988): Visual evoked potentials to multiple temporal frequencies. Use in the differential diagnosis of optic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol 106: 936-940.
4. Brigell M, Kaufman DI, Bobak P & Beydoun A (1994): The pattern visual evoked potential. A multicenter study using standardized techniques. Doc Ophthalmol 86: 65-79.
5. Cavonius CR & Sternheim CE (1972): A component of electrophysiological and psychophysical temporal modulation transfer functions of human vision. In: Arden GB, ed. The Visual System. Neurophysiology, Biophysics, and their Clinical Applications. New York: Plenum Press: 223-235.
6. Halliday AM, McDonald WI & Mushin J (1972): Delayed visual evoked response in optic neuritis. Lancet 1: 982-985.
7. Regan D (1977): Steady-state evoked potentials. J Opt Soc Am 67: 1475-1489.
8. Riemslag FC, Spekreijse H & Van Walbeek H (1982): Pattern evoked potential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A comparison of various contrast stimuli. In: Courjon J, Mauguiere F, Revol M, eds. The Clinical Applications of Evoked Potentials in Neurology. New York: Raven Press: 417-426.
9. Tobimatsu S, Tashima-Kurita S, Nakayama-Hiromatsu M & Kato M (1991): Clinical relevance of phase of steady-state VEPs to P100 latency of transient VEPs. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 80: 89-93.