The Mitrofanoff procedure in paediatric urinary tract reconstruction

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 199-202

  Ahmed, Saeed ^a,b   Sen, Sudipta ^a  

^a KING FAISAL SPECIALIST HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTER   (Saudi Arabia)

^b WOMEN S AND CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Appendix; Clean intermittent catheterization; Continent stoma; Ureter; Urinary tract reconstruction

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; APPENDIX; ARTICLE; BLADDER RECONSTRUCTION; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLON; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMITTENT CATHETERIZATION; MALE; PEDIATRIC SURGERY; PLASTIC SURGERY; STOMA; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; URETER; URETER REIMPLANTATION; URETEROSTOMY; URINARY DIVERSION; URINARY TRACT SURGERY;

EID: 0031954209     PISSN: 00048682     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1998.tb04745.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Gilchrist RK, Merricks JW, Hamlin MH, Rieger IT. Construction of a substitute bladder and urethra. Surg. Gynecol Obstet. 1950; 90: 752-60.
2. Kock NG. The development of the continent ileal reservoir (Kock pouch) and application in patients requiring urinary diversion. In: King LR, Stone AR, Webster CD (eds). Bladder Reconstruction and Continent Urinary Diversion. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1986; 269-89.
3. Mitrofanoff P. Cystostomie continente trans-apendiculaire dans le traitement des vessies neurologique. Chir. Pediatr. 1980; 21: 297-305.
4. Snyder HM III, Ducket JW. Mitrofanoff principle in continent reconstruction of the lower urinary tract. In: Marshall FF (ed.). Operative Urology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1991; 221-31.
5. Sen S, Ahmed S. Construction of a catheterizable continent urinary conduit from an isolated segment of colon. Aust. N.Z. J. Surg. 1998; 68: (in press).
6. Hensle TW, Kirsch AJ, Kennedy WA II, Reiley EA. Bladder neck closure in association with continent urinary diversion. J. Urol. 1995; 154: 883-5.
7. Jayanthi VR, Churchill BM, McLorie GA, Khoury AE. Concomitant bladder neck closure and Mitrofanoff diversion for the management of intractable urinary incontinence. J. Urol. 1995; 154: 886-8.
8. Horowitz M, Kuhr CS, Mitchell ME. The Mitrofanoff catheterizable channel: Patient acceptance. J. Urol. 1995; 153: 771-2.
9. Watson HS, Bauer SB, Peters CA et al. Comparative urodynamics of appendiceal and ureteral Mitrofanoff conduits in children. J. Urol. 1995; 154: 878-82.
10. Keetch DW, Basler JW, Kavoussi LR, Catalona WJ. Modification of Mitrofanoff principle for continent urinary diversion. Urology 1993; 41: 507-10.
11. Sumfest JM, Burns MW, Mitchell ME. The Mitrofanoff principle in urinary reconstruction. J. Urol. 1993; 150: 1875-8.
12. Duckett JW, Lofti AH, Appendicovesicostomy (and variations) in bladder reconstruction. J. Uuol. 1993; 149: 567-9.
13. Elder JS. Continent appendicocolostomy: A variation of the Mitrofanoff principle in pediatric urinary tract reconstruction. J. Urol. 1992; 148: 117-19.
14. Woodhouse CRJ, Macneily AE. The Mitrofanoff principle: Expanding upon a versatile technique. Br. J. Urol. 1994; 74: 447-53.
15. Borzi P, Gough DCS. Pedicled gastric tube as a catheterising conduit. Eur. Urol. 1993; 24: 103-5.
16. Figueroa TE, Sabogal L, Helal M, Lockhart JL. The tapered and reimplanted small bowel as a variation of the Mitrofanoff procedure: Preliminary results. J. Urol. 1994; 152: 73-5.
17. Klauber GT, Cendron M. Continent vesicostomy using a catheterizable posterior bladder tube: Modification of the Mitrofanoff principle. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1994; 29: 71-3.