The role of evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in diagnosis of occupational noise-induced hearing loss

Journal of Audiological Medicine

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 29-45

  Sliwinska Kowalska, M ^a  

^a NOFER INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE   (Poland)

Author keywords

Diagnosis; Malingers; Occupational noise induced hearing loss; Transient evoked otoacoustic emission

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INDUSTRIAL NOISE; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL DEAFNESS; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCREENING TEST;

EID: 0031954026     PISSN: 09637133     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bonfils P, Avan P. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Values for clinical use. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992; 118: 1069-76.
2. Collet L, Gartner M, Moulin A, Kauffman I., Disant F, Morgon A. Evoked otoacoustic emissions and sensorineural hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 115: 1060-62.
3. Hamernik RP, Patterson JH, Turrentine GA, Ahroon WA. The quantitative relation between sensory cell loss and hearing thresholds. Hear Res 1989; 38: 199-212.
4. Harris FP. Distortion-product otoaocustic emissions in humans with high frequency sensorineural hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res 1990; 33: 594-600.
5. Harris FP, Probst R. Reporting click-evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emission results with respect to the pure-tone audiogram. Ear Hear 1991; 12: 399-405.
6. Hotz MA, Probst R, Harris PP, Hauser R. Monitoring the effects of noise exposure using transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. Acta Otolaryngol Stockh 1993; 113: 478-82.
7. Katona G, Buki B, Farkas Z, Pytel J, Simon-Nagy E, Hirschberg J. Transitory evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) in a child with profound hearing loss. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1993; 26: 263-7.
8. Kemp DT, Ryan S. The use of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonatal hearing screening programs. Semin Hear 1993; 14: 30-45.
9. Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. The clinical utility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 144-54.
10. Lonsbury-Martin BL, Whitehead ML, Martin GK. Clinical applications of otoacoustic emissions. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34: 964-81.
11. Nelson DA, Kimberley BP. Distortion-product emissions and auditory sensitivity in human ears with normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 1142-59.
12. Ohlms LA, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. Acoustic-distortion-products: separation of sensory from neural dysfunction in sensorineural hearing loss in human beings and rabbits. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 104: 159-75.
13. Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK, Coats AC. Otoacoustic emissions in ears with hearing loss. Am J Otolaryngol 1987; 8: 73-8.
14. Reshef I, Attias J, Furst M. Evoked otoacoustic emissions in testing noise-induced, sensorineural and functional hearing losses. Abstract of First European Conference on Audiology, Cambridge, Sept. 21-24, 1992: 77.
15. Sliwinska-Kowalska M, Sulkowski W, Jedlinska J, Rydzynski K. Relationships between functional and morphological changes in the cochlea of guinea pigs after exposure to industrial noise. Proc 6th International Congress 'Noise & Man'93', 1993; 2: 127-30.
16. Subramaniam M, Henderson D, Spongr V. The relationship among distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, evoked potential thresholds and outer hair cells following interrupted noise exposures. Ear Hear 1994; 15: 299-309.
17. Sulkowski W, Sliwinska-Kowalska M. Noise-induced hearing loss and auditory evoked potentials measurements. Proc. FASE 92 (Zurich) 1992: 201-4.