Assessing the willingness of parents to pay for reducing postoperative emesis in children

PharmacoEconomics

Volumn 13, Issue 5 PART II, 1998, Pages 589-595

  Diez, Lara ^a  

^a GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIEMETIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; CHILD; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DRUG COST; HUMAN; PARENT; PEDIATRIC SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VOMITING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANTIEMETICS; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; PARENTS; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING;

EID: 0031948455     PISSN: 11707690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199813050-00011     Document Type: Article

References (2)

1. Cohen MM, Cameron CB, Duncan PG. Pediatric anesthesia morbidity and mortality in the perioperative period. Anesth Analg 1990; 70: 160-7
2. Lin DM, Furst SR, Rodarte A. A double-blinded comparison of metoclopramide and droperidol for prevention of emesis following strabismus surgery. Anesthesiology 1992; 76: 357-61