Quantifying uncertainty in tracer-based hydrograph separations

Water Resources Research

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 915-919

  Genereux, David ^a  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SEPARATION;

HYDROGRAPH SEPARATION; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; THREE COMPONENT; TRACER CONCENTRATION; TWO-COMPONENT;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 0031946565     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/98WR00010     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bazemore, D. E., K. N. Eshleman, and K. J. Hollenbeck, The role of soil water in stormflow generation in a forested headwater catchment: Synthesis of natural tracer and hydrometric evidence, J. Hydrol., 162, 47-75, 1994.
2. DeWalle, D. R., B. R. Swistock, and W. E. Sharpe, Three component tracer model for stormflow on a small Appalachian forested catchment, J. Hydrol., 104, 301-310, 1988.
3. Eshleman, K. N., J. S. Pollard, and A. K. O'Brien, Determination of contributing areas for saturation overland flow from chemical hydrograph separations, Water Resour. Res., 29(10), 3577-3587, 1993.
4. Genereux, D. P., and H. F. Hemond, Naturally occurring radon 222 as a tracer for streamflow generation: Steady state methodology and field example, Water Resour. Res., 26(12), 3065-3075, 1990.
5. 222Rn and calcium as tracers in a three-end-member mixing model for streamflow generation on the West Fork of Walker Branch Watershed, J. Hydrol., 142, 167-211, 1993.
6. Hendershot, W. H., S. Savoie, and F. Courchesne, Simulation of stream-water chemistry with soil solution and groundwater flow contributions, J. Hydrol., 136, 237-252, 1992.
7. Hooper, R. P., and C. A. Shoemaker, A comparison of chemical and isotopic hydrograph separation, Water Resour. Res., 22(10), 1444-1454, 1986.
8. Hooper, R. P., N. Christophersen, and N. E. Peters, Modelling streamwater chemistry as a mixture of soil water end members: An application to the Panola Mountain catchment, Georgia, U.S.A., J. Hydrol., 116, 321-343, 1990.
9. Kleissen, F. M., H. S. Wheater, M. B. Beck, and R. Harriman, Conservative mixing of water sources: Analysis of the behaviour of the Allt a' Mharcaidh catchment, J. Hydrol., 116, 365-374, 1990.
10. Kline, S. J., The purposes of uncertainty analysis, J. Fluids Eng., 107, 153-160, 1985.
11. Kobayashi, D., K. Suzuki, and M. Nomura, Diurnal fluctuation in stream flow and in specific electric conductance during drought periods, J. Hydrol., 115, 105-114, 1990.
12. Linsley, R. K., M. A. Kohler, and J. L. H. Paulhus, Hydrology for Engineers, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1982.
13. McDonnell, J., M. Bonell, M. K. Stewart, and A. J. Pearce, Deuterium variations in storm rainfall: Implications for stream hydrograph separation, Water Resour. Res., 26(3), 455-458, 1990.
14. McDonnell, J., M. K. Stewart, and I. F. Owens, Effect of catchment-scale subsurface mixing on stream isotopic response, Water Resour. Res., 27(12), 3065-3073, 1991.
15. Meyer, S. L., Data Analysis for Scientists and Engineers, John Wiley, New York, 1975.
16. Mulholland, P. J., Hydrometric and stream chemistry evidence of three storm flowpaths in Walker Branch Watershed, J. Hydrol., 151, 291-316, 1993.
17. Neal, C., A. Robson, and C. J. Smith, Acid neutralization capacity variations for the Hafren Forest stream, mid-Wales: Inferences for hydrological processes, J. Hydrol., 121, 85-101, 1990.
18. Pearce, A. J., M. K. Stewart, and M. G. Sklash, Storm runoff generation in humid headwater catchments, 1, Where does the water come from?, Water Resour. Res., 22(8), 1263-1272, 1986.
19. Peters, D. G., J. M. Hayes, and G. M. Hieftje, Chemical Separations and Measurements: Theory and Practice of Analytical Chemistry, pp. 19-22, W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa., 1974.
20. Pinder, G. F., and J. F. Jones, Determination of the groundwater component of peak discharge from the chemistry of total runoff, Water Resour. Res., 5(2), 438-445, 1969.
21. 18O trends for selected rainstorms in Pennsylvania, J. Hydrol., 138, 131-143, 1992.
22. Robson, A., and C. Neal, Hydrograph separation using chemical techniques: An application to catchments in mid-Wales, J. Hydrol., 116, 345-353, 1990.
23. Rodhe, A., Spring flood: Meltwater or groundwater?, Nord. Hydrol., 12, 21-30, 1981.
24. Rodhe, A., The origin of streamwater traced by oxygen-18, Rep. Ser. A41, 333 pp., Dep. of Phys. Geogr., Div. of Hydrol., Uppsala Univ., Uppsala, Sweden, 1987.
25. Sklash, M. G., and R. N. Farvolden, The role of groundwater in storm runoff, J. Hydrol., 43, 45-65, 1979.
26. Sklash, M. G., R. N. Farvolden, and P. Fritz, A conceptual model of watershed response to rainfall, developed through the use of oxygen-18 as a natural tracer, Can. J. Earth Sci., 13, 271-283, 1976.
27. Sklash, M. G., M. K. Stewart, and A. J. Pearce, Storm runoff generation in humid headwater catchments, 2, A case study of hillslope and low-order stream response, Water Resour. Res., 22(8), 1273-1282, 1986.
28. Taylor, J. R., An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements, Univ. Sci. Books, Mill Valley, Calif., 1982.
29. Wels, C., R. J. Cornett, and B. D. Lazerte, Hydrograph separation: A comparison of geochemical and isotopic tracers, J. Hydrol., 122, 253-274, 1991.